Search This Blog

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Obama Flowchart - Democracy Denied


Kudos to Tigerhawk for this graphic!

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Seeing as the graphic already completely gets the facts wrong on healthcare, is there any point in factchecking the rest of it?

WomanHonorThyself said...

what do we do now!

Anonymous said...

Notice how the information posts and subsequent embarrassing (for Radar) discussions have been completely pushed off the front page by our dear ol' YEC Blogger? Just par for the course I guess. More of Radar just running away from debates in which he's had his position utterly destroyed. Good try Radar, keep in mind though, no matter how hard you try to hide your shame. We all know it's there and exactly where to find it, for that matter.

http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2010/03/genetic-algorithms-are-irrelevant-to.html

http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2010/03/question-of-information-darwinism-has.html

http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-information-is.html

- Canucklehead.

radar said...

Caknucklehead is so far behind he doesn't realize he has been lapped.

Darwinism's claims concerning the gene have all been ripped to shreds. The cell has been revealed to be even more complex than before, the "junk" DNA all has purposes previously unknown and the possibilities of one kind of animal evolving into another has been all but falsified now. Catch up.

creeper said...

"what do we do now!"

Relax and watch Radar's hysterical predictions not come true.

-- creeper

creeper said...

"Darwinism's claims concerning the gene have all been ripped to shreds."

Wishful thinking yet again. I don't know if you've noticed, but you have a habit of giving more credence to unsupported hypotheses than scientific theories supported by plenty of evidence as long as those hypotheses support your point. If it amuses you, that's fine, but somewhere in that brain of yours there must be some awareness that that is the direct opposite of going "where the evidence leads".

"The cell has been revealed to be even more complex than before,"

You never tire of that argument from incredulity, do you? Just because something is complex does not mean that it can't have evolved.

"the "junk" DNA all has purposes previously unknown"

All junk DNA has purposes previously unknown? That's just an outright lie, Radar.

And besides, there is nothing found in noncoding DNA that is incompatible with the theory of evolution.

"and the possibilities of one kind of animal evolving into another has been all but falsified now."

First, is this an allusion to your hilariously uninformed claim that the theory of evolution predicts that bacteria should turn into something other than bacteria in a lab experiment? Please don't embarrass yourself further by pursuing that claim, since it does little more than mark you as someone who knows nothing about both biology and the theory of evolution.

Second, the "possibility" that one "kind of animal" (would be nice if you caught up on the terminology some day - remember, Linnaeus was a Christian, so it's all right) is not only not falsified, it is confirmed so extensively that that aspect is now considered the "fact of evolution". The theory of evolution is the part that deals with explaining how that happened.

"Catch up."

It's not easy keeping up with your delusions of grandeur sometimes, especially when you deem mere statements of hypotheses as sufficient to disprove scientific theories confirmed by any number of experiments and observations across different disciplines. But that's the kind of messy thinking you get when you put the cart in front of the horse and the conclusion before the evidence.

As for Canucklehead's point, he's absolutely right that you've been evading the arguments regarding loss/gain of information. It may well be because you were swept up in hysteria over healthcare reform in recent days, but even before that you were remarkably obtuse and evasive.

None of us will be surprised if you now move to the next phase in the Radar playbook: abandon the argument and declare victory, then in a couple of weeks or so claim that you answered everything, and you won't do our homework for us by showing where you did so.

But whether you realize it or not, scohen and Jon thoroughly dismantled your claims. You don't win an argument by failing to even comprehend the answers you are given.

-- creeper

Anonymous said...

I've been "lapped" hey? Even if that's true, at least I'm actually in the race. You seem to be off in your own little universe somewhere mumbling TO YOURSELF about how you've won... you've finally won... Crazy, crazy stuff. I'm actually thinking that with pompous self congratulatory posts like the one below, the most likely answer is that you have picked up the crack pipe again. Radar says,

"Darwinism's claims concerning the gene have all been ripped to shreds. The cell has been revealed to be even more complex than before, the "junk" DNA all has purposes previously unknown and the possibilities of one kind of animal evolving into another has been all but falsified now. Catch up."

Do you even understand that you effectively make a mockery of all your positions by holding to this alternate-realty view of the present day. It's as if you so enjoyed the climate-deniers claims of victory over the alleged "hacked email" controversy (see this clip for some real facts - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg) that you though you would try it on the "darwinist" front. Despite the fact that you have no basis from which to make this claim whatsoever. I mean, "Darwin's claims" have certainly not been ripped to shreds, in fact, the only things that have been "shredded" in the last week on this blog are most (if not all) of your positions on science. In your wildest dreams statements like you make above are true. So maybe it's time to go back to sleep Radar, either that or take another hit.

- Canucklehead.