That is what scientists SHOULD have said. However, the strong pull of religion has kept them from admitting even to themselves what the implications of DNA and the makeup of the cell actually are and why God is the only logical answer. Atheism and Atheopathy (hatred of God) as the religion of the majority of scientists, educators and journalists means that the worlds of science, education and information media are dominated by religious zealots who fly under the radar as high priests of the Atheist Naturalist Darwinist religion because they all pretend that naturalism and darwinism are not religious dogmatic aspects of atheism.
Here is Stormbringer. You could also call him Cowboy Bob? Two Stormbringer posts to introduce his blog to you and to illustrate why Darwinism is a religion rather than science. It is a complete and utter failure scientifically. Organisms are quite obviously designed and designed to be far more efficient than anything mankind can yet devise! Read, watch and learn...
July 22, 2012
When they could not determine the uses of some human organs, they were called "vestigial", or "leftover from our evolutionary past". (This led to unnecessary (but profitable!) surgeries to remove appendixes, adenoids and so on.) Later, the so-called leftovers were determined to have functions that were hitherto unknown, much to the embarrassment of scientists.
At one time, the "simple" cell was considered to be rather well understood. Then technology advanced, and science advanced with it. The "simple" cell is not so simple after all. In fact, it is astonishingly complex — and it is still not fully understood.
Arrogance naturally spills over when studying the human genome. Since it is not fully understood, showy scientists (with their faulty evolutionist worldview) tag things they do not understand as "junk DNA". The fact is, DNA is also astonishingly complex. It would be much safer for scientists to label something as "not yet understood" rather than to pretend they know all about it, call it "junk", and then get humiliated later on.
When I pointed out the astonishing complexity of just one strand of DNA and how there is no way it could have formed by chance, an ignorant fundie evolutionist said, "It must have been less complex back then". (Yes, I get told things by people who are woefully ignorant of science all the time, but have faith in evolutionism.) This short video shows some of the complexity of DNA and the information exchanged contained within.
Stormbringer's blog is already linked for you. He is the guy who brings us the Question Evolution Project on facebook, among other things. One more post for you...
July 27, 2012
Good job, Nicky, you said your lines well.
Evolution is protected by fundamentalist extremists who will go to almost any lengths to keep people from actually thinking:
- Using the fallacy of reification, evolution is treated as if it was a living thing, complete with intelligence and decision making abilities
- Instead of giving satisfactory explanations to evidence, evolutionists pile story upon story and call it science
- Misrepresent creationists and ID proponents
- Edit: Biases and circular reasoning
- Actively suppress dissent of evolution
- Fight to leave the bad, outdated science in the textbooks to continue brainwashing
- Recommend that textbooks get accepted without question
- Lie about evolution — after all, the end justifies the means, and the goal is to have people blindly accept evolutionism
Now the thought police have actually banned the teaching of creation in the UK — even in religious education classes! Yep, teach creation and your school will lose its funding. Cowards. But what do you expect from people who willingly promote the fallacy of evolution? The assault on evolution is growing, including places like Question Evolution! and The Question Evolution Project. The storm is coming. Be afraid, evolutionists. Be very afraid.