Deluded Darwinists Still Ruling Despite Evidence? Design = Blue Whale In Room!

Having just finished a five part series from a great interview of William Dembski,  it is worth pointing the reader back to those posts because Dembski and the interviewer sketch out a journey of inquiry within a world of parochial fundamentalists of various stripes.   Like playing an old mechanical pinball machine, Dembski's career has been a rolling steel ball being flipped from one place and settling into another, only to be flung out again to bounce off of things, accumulating points, avoiding going down into the hole at the bottom which would be to change careers or abandon principles.    William Dembski has steadfastly worked the flippers and remained relevant despite the obstacles.  

News that supports Intelligent Design continues to explode all around us!   Recently scientists managed to put 700 Terabytes of data on one gram of DNA!!!   Not that we can either input or transcribe DNA code at the speed of cells.   Cells are able to read and utilize DNA information hundreds of times in one second.   Nevertheless, the obvious superiority of DNA to our own binary digital information storage schemes has caused scientists to copy the Great Designer yet again.   Not that they are willing to give God any credit.   Nope, Darwinist propaganda masquerading as science remains the status quo.   But as the article below reveals, real science is paying attention to design in nature and learning from it!

Evolution is not the basis for understanding nature, Intelligent Design is the basis and it is design found in nature that is exciting and inspiring scientists to improve the lot of mankind.  

Inventors Covet Nature’s Engineering


Scientists and entrepreneurs can’t get enough of the design solutions found in the living world.

Snake-bots:

Worm-bots:

Gecko tape update:

Bamboo construction:

Octobot camouflage:

Flower power:

Ultimate hard drive:


Other recent posts of interest from Creation-Evolution Headlines:




(To view actual evidence about the Solar System and stars I would access Spike Psarris's site)

Honestly, any real discussion of what Darwinism asserts brings to mind the kid you lent five bucks to back in junior high school.   He'll never give it back and in fact you will not likely ever see him again.    Darwinists are always telling us that an evidence check is in the mail while talking in circles and making up stories.   Darwinism taken to the logical end is Determinism, so that you cannot even reason for yourself or have free will, you have evolved to do what you do.   Check it out!

How many decades now have Darwinists glossed over the total lack of evidence for their primary premises?   One guy (Outing the Moronocracy) identified thirty scientific incompetencies at the National Academy of Sciences.   Take a look at the excerpts and ask yourself if Darwinism has actually added any positive thing to the world of science at all?  Thanks to Karl Priest for the link!

Darwinism is not even a theory, since a theory must be able to be tested and positive results must be recorded.   Therefore it is only an hypothesis.   One of its most important doctrines involves life coming from non-life, but this idea of "spontaneous generation" was folklore that 17th Century scientists sought to disprove, such as Reddi.   In the 19th Century a number of scientists performed experiments to prove not even the very simplest form of life came from non-life.    Louis Pasteur's experiments in 1864 were so convincing that science declared the Law of Biogenesis.   Darwinists have now had 148 years since that Law was accepted to present even one experiment that refutes it and they have always failed.   Darwinism is dead before it begins because it cannot produce life.   Call it chemical evolution or abiogenesis, it is impossible and ludicrous in the extreme.   Thus Naturalism has no claim on science.   It cannot even account for life.

If you do an internet search, you will read numerous lies.  The Law of Biogenesis is downgraded to a theory and it is said to be unlike abiogenesis or chemical evolution.  Darwinists do not want to face the truth and especially don't want YOU to know the truth, which is exactly as the great Pasteur said:  " ‘Spontaneous generation is a chimera [illusion].’—Louis Pasteur, French chemist and microbiologist."—*Isaac Asimov’s Book of Science and Nature Quotations (1988), p. 193.  Chimera is a word also used for a bad dream or nightmare.

Ironically, While Pasteur was refuting a Naturalistic start to life, Darwin himself had been publishing papers and exchanging publications with various men and had taken his own ideas and observations plus those by men like Wallace, Hutton and Blyth to publish a book that described organisms evolving from simpler forms.    He had not yet challenged the role of God as Creator but eventually that is exactly what Darwinism would do and with full agreement of Darwin himself.   Yes, just as science had finally disproven the pagan and silly concept of life just popping up out of piles of rags, Darwinists were seeking to build the mythology back up again.

Meanwhile, where are the examples of organisms evolving upwards to more complex forms?   We have the reverse happening all around us, but that supports Creation of organisms armed with rich genetic information stores within their DNA, able to adjust to various environmental pressures and still survive and reproduce.  Speciation is right in line with Creationism.    Real science has identified design and codes within organisms, which is exactly what Creationists would expect to see but has nothing at all to do with evolution.   I ask you, exactly what has evolution done for humanity besides waste billions of dollars and man-hours searching in vain to find it?  If futility is science, then evolution has its place.   Darwinist scientists should receive doctorates in futility.  Ph.D F.   Otherwise?  No.