Search This Blog

Sunday, October 28, 2012

15 Questions that falsify or debunk evolution. 15 Questions that prove Darwinism is like a zombie. Darwinism is dead, someone just needs to shoot it in the head!

"Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”9 Dr Skell wrote, .It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers …" 10 Evolution actually hinders medical discovery.11 Then why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind? - From article below..."

Don Batten and the Creation Ministries International organization, and also 'Cowboy' Bob Sorenson of the Question Evolution Project team up to present 15 questions Darwinists cannot answer.   There are more than 15, naturally, but these are killers!

5 Questions for Evolutionists

Evolution: the naturalistic origin of life and its diversity

(The General Theory of Evolution, as defined by the evolutionist Kerkut, does include the origin of life.)
    CMI Logo for project

  1. How did life originate? Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.”1 Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet”.2 A minimal cell needs several hundred proteins. Even if every atom in the universe were an experiment with all the correct amino acids present for every possible molecular vibration in the supposed evolutionary age of the universe, not even one average-sized functional protein would form. So how did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design? See: 15 loopholes in the evolutionary theory of the origin of life (Summary). Video on Question 1

  2. How did the DNA code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design? How did the DNA coding system arise without it being created? See: The genetic information code points to an intelligent source. Video on Question 2

  3. Thanks to “Cowboy Bob” Sorensen for this ‘YouTube’ version of the 15 questions brochure.

  4. How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? There is information for how to make proteins but also for controlling their use—much like a cookbook contains the ingredients as well as the instructions for how and when to use them. One without the other is useless. See: Meta-information: An impossible conundrum for evolution. Mutations are known for their destructive effects, including over 1,000 human diseases such as hemophilia. Rarely are they even helpful. But how can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines with many components, to make ‘goo-to-you’ evolution possible? E.g., How did a 32-component rotary motor like ATP synthase (which produces the energy currency, ATP, for all life), or robots like kinesin (a ‘postman’ delivering parcels inside cells) originate? See: The evolution train’s a-comin’ (Sorry, a-goin’—in the wrong direction).
    Video on Question 3

  5. Why is natural selection, a principle recognized by creationists, taught as ‘evolution’, as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? By definition it is a selective process (selecting from already existing information), so is not a creative process. It might explain the survival of the fittest (why certain genes benefit creatures more in certain environments), but not the arrival of the fittest (where the genes and creatures came from in the first place). The death of individuals not adapted to an environment and the survival of those that are suited does not explain the origin of the traits that make an organism adapted to an environment. E.g., how do minor back-and-forth variations in finch beaks explain the origin of beaks or finches? How does natural selection explain goo-to-you evolution? See: Evolutionist Dr John Endler’s refreshing clarity about ‘natural selection’ has been largely ignored.
    Video on Question 4

  6. iStockphoto
    A vase of flowers: the vase clearly shows design; surely the flowers do much more so
    Everyone recognizes design in a glass vase, but evolutionists refuse to believe that the flowers in the vase must also have been designed. The problem is not that they do not show design, but that they show too much design. 

  7. How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? Every pathway and nano-machine requires multiple protein/enzyme components to work. How did lucky accidents create even one of the components, let alone 10 or 20 or 30 at the same time, often in a necessary programmed sequence. Evolutionary biochemist Franklin Harold wrote, “we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.3 See: Design in living organisms (motors: ATP synthase) (includes animation).
    Video on Question 5

  8. Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Richard Dawkins wrote, “biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.”4 Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”5 The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much design. Who objects when an archaeologist says that pottery points to human design? Yet if someone attributes the design in living things to a designer, that is not acceptable. Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes? See: Is the design explanation legitimate?
    Video on Question 6

  9. How did multi-cellular life originate? How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize (including undergoing programmed cell death) to create complex plants and animals? See: Evolution of multicellularity: what is required?
    Video on Question 7

  10. How did sex originate? Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs). See: Argument: Evolution of sex.
    Video on Question 8

  11. Photo by Joachim Scheven
    Horseshoe crabs
    The horseshoe crab is one of thousands of organisms living today that show little change from their ‘deep time’ fossils. In the supposed ‘200 million’ years that the horseshoe crab has remained unchanged (no evolution), virtually all reptiles, dinosaurs, birds, mammals and flowering plants have supposedly evolved. 

  12. Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Darwin noted the problem and it still remains. The evolutionary family trees in textbooks are based on imagination, not fossil evidence. Famous Harvard paleontologist (and evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”.6 Other evolutionist fossil experts also acknowledge the problem. See: That quote!—about the missing transitional fossils.
    Video on Question 9

  13. How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote, “the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.”7 See: Living fossils: a powerful argument for creation.
    Video on Question 10

  14. How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? If everything evolved, and we invented God, as per evolutionary teaching, what purpose or meaning is there to human life? Should students be learning nihilism (life is meaningless) in science classes? See: G.K. Chesterton: Darwinism is ‘An attack upon thought itself’.
    Video on Question 11

  15. Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? Evolutionists often use flexible story-telling to ‘explain’ observations contrary to evolutionary theory. NAS(USA) member Dr Philip Skell wrote, “Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.”8 See: ‘Just-so’ stories of sex and family life.
    Video on Question 12

  16. Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: “In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”9 Dr Skell wrote, .It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers …" 10 Evolution actually hinders medical discovery.11 Then why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind? See: Is evolution relevant or helpful to real science?
    Video on Question 13

  17. Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? You cannot do experiments, or even observe what happened, in the past. Asked if evolution has been observed, Richard Dawkins said, “Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.”12 See: A valid distinction: origins science versus operational science.
    Video on Question 14

  18. Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Karl Popper, famous philosopher of science, said “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research programme ….”13 Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.14 If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught? See: The religious nature of evolution, “It’s not science.
    Video on Question 15

Related articles


  1. Davies, Paul, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Sydney, New Scientist 179(2403):32, 2003. Return to text.
  2. Knoll, Andrew H., PBS Nova interview, How Did Life Begin? July 1, 2004. Return to text.
  3. Harold, Franklin M. (Prof. Emeritus Biochemistry, Colorado State University) The way of the cell: molecules, organisms and the order of life, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001, p. 205. Return to text.
  4. Dawkins, R., The Blind Watchmaker, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, p. 1, 1986. Return to text.
  5. Crick, F., What mad pursuit: a Personal View of Scientific Discovery, Sloan Foundation Science, London, 1988, p. 138. Return to text.
  6. Gould, Stephen Jay, Evolution’s erratic pace, Natural History 86(5):14, May 1977. Return to text.
  7. Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N., Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366:223–224, 1993. Return to text.
  8. Skell, P.S., Why Do We Invoke Darwin? Evolutionary theory contributes little to experimental biology, The Scientist 19(16):10, 2005. Return to text.
  9. As quoted in the Boston Globe, 23 October 2005. Return to text.
  10. Skell, P.S., The Dangers Of Overselling Evolution; Focusing on Darwin and his theory doesn’t further scientific progress, Forbes magazine, 23 Feb 2009; Return to text.
  11. E.g. Krehbel, M., Railroad wants monkey off its back, Creation 16(4):20–22, 1994; Return to text.
  12.>, 3 December, 2004. Return to text.
  13. Popper, K., Unended Quest, Fontana, Collins, Glasgow, p. 151, 1976. Return to text.
  14. Ruse, M., How evolution became a religion: creationists correct? National Post, pp. B1,B3,B7 May 13, 2000. Return to text.

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Give me liberty or give me death! True in 1775 and true in 2012!

Give me liberty or give me death! 

Courtesy Liberal Offender

Carol the Christian Soldier produced a blogpost about the Benghazi travesty.  Did the Obama Administration deliberately try to make it easy for terrorists to kidnap an ambassador so that they could then trade the Blind Sheik for that Ambassador right before the election?   Why did the Administration deliberately remove security on 9/11 knowing that an attack was planned?  We know now that they knew in advance and lied about it afterwards.   If there was a press corps in the mainstream media with courage and not sold out to the Democrats this would be ten times the scandal of Watergate!    Between Fast and Furious and Benghazi the blood on the hands of the Obama Administration shouts out for justice!  

There is no doubt that the brave Seals who gave their lives saving others were murdered and that the Obama Administration has no excuse for denying help - no Delta Force was sent in, no drone-guided bombs or attack ships.   The Embassy and the CIA compound were left to fend for themselves.  This is monstrously wrong.   It should be considered treasonous and the Administration needs to be investigated to find out who ordered forces to "stand down" and not help the helpless and outgunned Americans in Libya?   Who is the traitor that ordered the troops and support to "stand down?"  Who will stand up for the heroes like Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, men who gave their lives to protect others while the eyes of the Administration watched for six-plus hours and did NOTHING?!

Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik

"...That Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released.

But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.

Their beloved Blind Sheik.


Western Journalism broke the news on Monday that a source connected to the White House has stated that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was a botched kidnapping linked to one Barack Hussein Obama."

(If you go down near the bottom of this post you will see videos documenting several examples of Democrat voting fraud and Barack Obama tipping his hand as to who he really is and what he believes, so don't forget to look)

I have looked death in the eyes before.   Once when I stepped between a roaring drunk friend and a drunk retired Colonel with a Colt .45 that looked like a cannon.  But I stood right before that gun and pleaded with the man not to shoot, that the damages our friend had done to the room would be repaid.  To his everlasting credit, Buck Buchanon came and stood beside me before that gun.  That drunk, a large Oklahoman named Hill, is hopefully still alive and well.   Yet millions of men have been more courageous than have I.    I cannot claim to have great courage, but when push comes to shove I will take a stand.   Courage is not the lack of fear, that is foolishness.  Courage is facing fear and moving forward anyway.   Today men and women of faith need to find courage within themselves and go out and vote all the ungodly men and women out of office!   Elect those who will defend the Constitution rather than Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."   Elect those who will stand up for the lives of the unborn children.  God hears their cries from the womb when the suction tubes and knives come after them to take their lives.   Ultrasound done during abortions show the babies trying to find a place in the womb to escape the killing machine seeking to end their lives.  Seeing a baby desperately trying to stay alive in the womb during an abortion convinced Abby Johnson to abandon a lucrative position with Planned Parenthood and begin to work to save lives.  

When my country drafted me out of college, I did not flee with the many who ran to Canada.  I stepped across that line and vowed to defend the Constitution of the Unites States with my very life.  Many of my generation fled, to their shame, and were allowed back in by the back door, snuck in and kept in old abandoned wooden barracks at Fort Benjamin Harrison in Indianapolis, among other spots.  I remember driving past those barracks and wondering what the price of abandoning honor and duty would be extracted from their souls?   How did they look in the mirror each morning?

I had a scholarship, a Mustang convertible, a good job and a pretty girlfriend and they pulled me right off of the campus to go to the induction center.   If anyone had a right to complain it was me.  As a child I had walked door to door with Goldwater pamphlets, begging people not to elect LBJ.  I told them LBJ would drag the war on so long I might be drafted, and if so, how many good young Americans would die in the process?   I told them he was a dirty back-room dealmaker with no scruples and a dimbulb for a brain.   But Americans voted LBJ in and he turned Vietnam into a human meat grinder and established a class of government-dependent serfs who would be rewarded for having babies out of wedlock and penalized for being married.   The Great Society was a ploy to take the poor of the nation and enslave them for peanuts in exchange for automatic votes for Democrats.   Shame on men such as Jesse Jackson, who make a living from racism and keep it alive in order to make large amounts of money for themselves while leaving the poor to try to live on a paltry government paycheck and the underground economy of the drugs, prostitution, theft and numbers games!

How many ghetto communities in Gary, in Chicago, in Detroit, in Los Angeles, and so on are ruled by Democratic Machines who have turned the poor into the new class of slaves and the once beautiful neighborhoods into the havens of drug dealers and junkies squatting in abandoned homes falling apart and infested with vermin of all kinds? 

When I became a Christian, I began to walk the areas where the poor and hungry and desperate lived. Mingling with gang members was normal.   I heard the cheers the girls sang to their gangs, the stories of who had been murdered and how the bodies were hidden in trash dumpsters.   I was threatened, once completely surrounded, once punched in my midsection hard by a big strong young man and I just looked him in the eye and told him, among other things, that God loved him despite that and anything else he had done.  I walked the streets of Gary and East Chicago.  I walked in Pilsen and the Cabrini Green area and South of South of the Yards where the police would caution us to leave while we were still alive.  We walked the Robert Taylor homes area as well.  These were places where the crime of being white could bring death, where the wearing of shirt and tie was asking for armed robbery.  Thankfully the gangs were superstitious and were mostly afraid of attacking men of God for fear that "What goes around comes around."   The fear that killing a Bible guy would bring about your own death was the only thing that saved us. 

But with a companion we would walk armed only with big black Bibles and the desire to bring hope to the hopeless no matter the cost.   A young man I know and his wife have settled in Latin Kings territory and set up church and home in the midst of chaos and violence, bringing love to those who do not know love.   They have courage, they live where at any time a random bullet might come through the front room wall and kill one of them.   They are always a potential target as they go forth to minister.  They have courage beyond my own and it is from love that their courage is drawn - love for the community of Pilsen above that of their very lives!

Courage is something that millions of Americans have displayed in wars from the beginning of this nation until today.   Men braver than I have lived and died under our flag, facing almost certain death on the beaches of Normandy, on the islands of the Pacific, in the air over Europe and the South and Central Pacific.  In trenches in WWI facing disease and gas attacks and tangles of barbed wire and booby traps and hails of lead bullets and exploding bombs.    Men of courage have charged on foot, on horseback, in jeeps and tanks and humvees and planes and jets and bombers, on board ships and in boats going underwater or helicopters packing great firepower but making an easy target.   

But there is a greater threat to America - Obamacare and the HHS Mandate!   This bill that no one was allowed to read before voting it in is an attack on the Bill of Rights!!!!

Now the war has come home and it is within the boundaries of our very nation.  Our own government is attacking the very rights spelled out in the Constitution and attempting to break the very words of the documents they are sworn to protect!   Harry Reid, Hilary Clinton, Eric Holder, Barack Obama, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi and those of their ilk have waged war on the Bill of Rights and Christianity and certainly the most vulnerable citizens of all, the babies not yet born!!!

Baby-murdering is evil and indefensible.   The attack of the ACLU on communities that put up crosses and creches and Jewish stars and menorahs and such things?  It is to drain money from the taxpayer and attempt to stamp out belief in our Creator God.   You know, the Creator that our Founding Fathers said gave us our "inalienable rights" in the Declaration of Independence?   That Creator God!   The one who defends the innocent and weak and forgives all who come to Him in repentance.   There is nothing so heinous that Jesus Christ cannot forgive and there is no life so good that you can try to sneak into eternal life without that same Jesus vouching for you.   

The story of March 23rd, 1775

Following the Boston Tea Party, Dec. 16, 1773, in which American colonists dumped 342 containers of tea into the Boston harbor, the British Parliament enacted a series of Acts in response to the rebellion in Massachusetts.

In May of 1774, General Thomas Gage, commander of all British military forces in the colonies, arrived in Boston, followed by the arrival of four regiments of British troops.
The First Continental Congress met in the fall of 1774 in Philadelphia with 56 American delegates, representing every colony, except Georgia. On September 17th, the Congress declared its opposition to the repressive Acts of Parliament, saying they are "not to be obeyed," and also promoted the formation of local militia units.

Thus economic and military tensions between the colonists and the British escalated. In February of 1775, a Provincial Congress was held in Massachusetts during which John Hancock and Joseph Warren began defensive preparations for a state of war. The British Parliament then declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion.

On March 23rd, in Virginia, the largest colony in America, a meeting of the colony's delegates was held in St. John's church in Richmond. Resolutions were presented by Patrick Henry putting the colony of Virginia "into a posture of defense...embodying, arming, and disciplining such a number of men as may be sufficient for that purpose." Before the vote was taken on his resolutions, Henry delivered the speech below, imploring the delegates to vote in favor.

He spoke without any notes in a voice that became louder and louder, climaxing with the now famous ending. Following his speech, the vote was taken in which his resolutions passed by a narrow margin, and thus Virginia joined in the American Revolution.

Patrick Henry from 1775, the summary portion of his speech given March 23rd of that year:

"...There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" 

Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith and J Christopher Stevens are dead.  The Obama Administration not only let it happen, they may have planned for the attack to take place.  

If they will not value the lives of our men and women overseas and they have no mercy for the unborn within our shores, what will they not do next?   Is there anything that the Administration is incapable of doing?    Would a second term of Obama bring about legalized Pedophilia, the giving up of our nuclear arsenal, a Great Depression that dwarfs that of the 20th Century and tyranny in place of Constitutional Law?   Would death panels decide when you were too old to remain alive?   What would this Administration NOT do?

From Project Veritas.   That organization has exposed multiple incidents of voter fraud but perhaps this one is the most amazing!   


We know the Democrats are promoting voter fraud, including a Congressman's son.   We know the ACORN buddies of the Democrats are promoting voter fraud!  They certainly did it in 2008!   In fact, there is a precinct in Gary that always reports very late and always gives 100% Democrat vote totals.  A statistical impossibility, but then the Gary Democrats are not particularly careful.   I believe the indicted Lake County Democrats now number over 50 in the last 25 years.  Six more of them were indicted in September of 2012.

"In the mad dash to vilify the Republicans and Conservatives today many have forgotten the fact that it was the Republican Party that was the champion of Civil Rights and freedom for African Americans." - Robert Rohlfing, CFP

Yes it was the Republicans, not the Democrats, who spearheaded the Civil Rights Movement, having to fight tooth and nail against Democrats like Lyndon Baines Johnson, who threw the "N" word around carelessly when voters were not in earshot.  President Eisenhower sponsored and passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.  Then LBJ came up with The Great Society, which was actually designed to keep the poor and minority voters both poor and voting Democrat.

Canada Free Press gives the story hereDemocrats segregated and formed the Jim Crow Laws and Republicans desegregated and put an end to Jim Crow!  I will edit one of the vile LBJ quotes found within:

“I’ll have those n_____s voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” —Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One - Ronald Kessler’s “Inside The White House

courtesy of Conservative Newsfeed

Therefore your vote is vital in this election.   Vote out the crooks and radicals and baby-murderers and vote in men and women who respect and will defend the Constitution of the United States.   As a veteran and an American, I implore you! 

Because this is not the way an American President should act:


Wednesday, October 24, 2012


The first portion of this blog post is a guest post from former blogger extraordinaire, Amy Proctor.   During her days as the Bottom Line Up Front blogger, she had a big audience and was interviewed on radio and television.  But she is also the wife of a Master Sergeant in the Army and has a quiver full of children to raise and she loves photography.  So now she concentrates on taking awesome pictures.
I am pleased to have a cd of her husband, Johnny, playing his upbeat Beach Boys-style music and it is excellent and music I play to make me smile.  Come Christmas I shall be purchasing an Amy Proctor photo book.  For now, I am giving her a platform to speak:

I am very disappointed in Mitt Romney’s performance last night at the final presidential debate against Barack Obama. Obama’s record on foreign policy is weaker than is record on the economy, and that’s really saying something. I found it excruciatingly painful to watch Obama sit there and paint himself as this great foreign policy leader with great instincts and some kind of a good record, somehow. The worst part was that Romney just sat there and let him do it.

Pure agony.

I’m going to lay out a handful of examples of what Mitt Romney should have said to Obama last night, in no particular order.

- When the topic of Benghazi, Libya came up, Romney should have said,

“Mr. Obama, you may think I responded too quickly but the fact is that I WAS RIGHT while you are STILL trying to figure out what happened in Benghazi. I understood this was a terrorist attack before all the details were in, as did most of the American people, while you spent weeks blaming it on an anti-Islam You Tube video. Not only that, your administration from US Embassy in Egypt immediately apologized for the video and Hillary Clinton made a video that was shown in Pakistan apologizing for the video, which cost American taxpayers tens of millions of dollars."

"So Mr. President, after all this time, you still haven’t gotten it right and I was right from the beginning. This is an example of the innate instincts a real leader must have, and you do not have them.”

- In 2009, the Iranian people rose up in protest against the fixed election which called Mahmoud Ahmadenijad the leader and the Iranian people courageously stood up against the bogus results and took to the streets in protest as Iranian police killed many protesters. Obama’s reaction? “"We are excited to see what appears to be a robust debate taking place in Iran". While Obama did not congratulate Ahmadenijad, he legitimized the results of the election with his comments and did not offer support to the pro-Democracy movement in Iran as they protested in the streets.

So when Obama denied that he didn’t stand with the Iranian people, all Mitt Romney had to say was,

“The American people don’t need to take my word for it. Just go to You Tube and search ‘2009 iran obama are you with us’ to see video of the Iranian pro-Democracy demonstrators crying, ‘OBAMA, ARE YOU WITH US OR WITH THEM?’ The people of Iran certainly believed they were abandoned by the President.”

- When Barack Obama ridiculed Romney for making a negative comment in London about how the 2012 Olympics were being organized, saying he alienated our best ally, Romney should have replied,

“Mr. President, if you want to talk about alienating our allies, you have done an outstanding job of alienating Afghan, Iraqi and Israeli allies. In 2008 you said publicly on 60 Minutes that Hamid Karzai had a ‘bunker mentality’ and wasn’t leading the fight in his country against the terrorists while in 2009 your administration publicly accused Karzai, the elected leader of Afghanistan and partner in a war, of being unhinged and mentally unstable. In 2008 your secretary of state to be Hillary Clinton publicly called for Iraqi Prime Minster Nouri al-Maliki to be replaced calling him incompetent, while your constant opposition to the war as a ‘mistake’ even after taking office has placed a wedge between the leadership of Iraq and the U.S. So Mr. President it is no wonder they could not reach a Status of Forces Agreement with you after such humiliating comments and its no wonder that Karzai is increasingly resistant to U.S. intervention in his country for the same reason.”

“Finally, when it comes to alienating our allies, what is your explanation for your administration exposing the Pakistani doctor who led us to bin Laden who now sits in a Pakistani prison for 30 years? How can any country ever cooperate with the United States again in a covert operation to track down terrorists if that is how you treat your friendly sources?”

- When Obama praised himself for ending the war in Iraq, Mitt Romney should have responded,

“Mr. President, you did not end the war in Iraq, you simply ended U.S. presence in Iraq. Al-Qaeda is making a big comeback in Iraq now and much of our gains are being unraveled so that you could keep a political promise to your base to end the war, but you’ve done no such thing. The war is still alive in Iraq and the sacrifices of our troops are being reversed.”

“And in Afghanistan, more troops have died in your first 2 years as Commander in Chief than under the previous 8 years combined.”

“And speaking of keeping promises to your base, Mr. President, didn’t you promise that the detainee facility at Guantanamo Bay would be closed within one year of you taking office, yet it is still up and running? If you cannot keep your promises to the American people, why should they trust you with another 4 years?”

- When Obama praised himself or the killing of Osama bin Laden, why didn’t Mitt Romney say,

“Mr. President, if you had your way with your opposition to President Bush’s terrorist surveillance program, to CIA prisons abroad and enhanced interrogation programs of terrorists, Osama bin Laden would not have been killed. It is thanks to the Bush policies that bin Laden was tracked down and killed. And George W. Bush would have credited the Navy SEALS for killing bin Laden, he wouldn’t have taken the credit himself.”

- When Obama accused Romney of being Bush 2.0 on foreign policy, Mitt Romney should have said,

“Mr. Obama, the Middle East is going up in flames. When you took 0ffice, the Bush administration foreign policy created a wave of pro-Democracy movements across the area. With the deposing of Saddam Hussein, now deceased Libyan leader Momar Kaddafi voluntarily gave up its WMD program and urged other Arab nations to do the same, saying, ‘Have you learned nothing from Iraq? You could be next!’ The Syrian occupation of Lebanon was ended as Lebanese forced the occupiers out of their country. Egypt experienced its first ever democratic election in its history. Syria and Iran were becoming increasingly isolated. Millions of Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq had been freed."

“Now, terrorism is spreading in Syria, Libya, Iraq, and a once long standing ally in Egypt has been overthrown with your encouraging. An imperfect leader, who worked to suppress the uprisings of radical groups in Egypt and who maintained a peace treaty for several decades with Israel has been overthrown because of your prompting, and has been replaced by the radical Muslim Brotherhood, who wish to institute the oppressive Shariah Law and whose stated objective is to crush Israel. This is not a democracy movement; this is the spread of terrorism. And this is how we treat our ally in Egypt?”

“In the years prior to your presidency, American citizens lived freely and openly in Egypt. Military families and diplomats and their families lived in safety as if they were living in South Korea or Germany. Can U.S. citizens live safely in Egypt today, Mr. President?”

- When Obama denied he apologized for America in his 2009 tour of Europe and the Middle East, saying he visited Israel in 2008 as a candidate, Mitt Romney should have said,

"Mr. President, I think it's great that you visited Israel... as a candidate. But as PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, you have NOT visited Israel when you toured the Middle East in 2009, you said, and I quote, that 'America has shown arrogance, been divisive and even derisive'..... but the American people don't have to take my word for it, they can search You Tube for '2009 obama apology tour' and watch you say it for themselves."

Now folks, this is just a handful of examples. Why Romney didn't refute any of these lies posed by Obama is a devastating mystery to me. Obama is low hanging fruit ripe for the picking.

But ultimately if this has no bearing on the elections, then I don't care. But if it does, this hurts.

I refuted every one of Obama's lies as the debate was going on and it was easy..... didn't you?
There were rallies for Religious Liberty all over this nation on October 20th - over 140 cities participated.   Yet the Mainstream Media barely said anything about them or gave them much coverage.   This is a blogpost on one in Crown Point, Indiana:
"Stand Up for Religious Freedom" ? Actually Rallying for ALL Freedoms!
One of the Democrats who attended spoke out about Obamacare.   The HHS Mandate is in violation of the First and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution.   Cue Woodrow Wilcox:

Monday, October 22, 2012

DNA disproves Darwinism - Ian Juby Strikes Again!

DNA - How long does it last?    We have a half-life for it, so we can conclude safely that anything a couple of million years old cannot possibly have any DNA intact/

Do Darwinists want to know?  Since we have evidence of DNA remnants in fossils supposedly many millions of years old, then you know the answer,

Uhm...well, no. 

Ian Juby is a brilliant man. His YouTubes are insightful, humorous and filled with information.  Frankly this video alone should prompt you to research the publicized discoveries of flesh and blood and even fungi and bacteria revived back to life after supposedly being dormant for millions of years.   Hopefully you will find that there are many such discoveries but they are not shouted from the rooftops like Darwinist mythology.

Wazooloo YouTube channel has this and many other great videos.  His website is here.   Now you have a lot of catching up to do IF you really like learning...

Friday, October 19, 2012

Antony Flew absolutely "flew the Darwinist coop" with clear thinking and purpose.

Sometimes they wake up from their intellectual slumber...Yes, most of the world simply goes from day to day.   Go to work, go home, relax, watch television, sometimes hang out with friends, sometimes do yard work, yawn, go to sleep.  Wake up, wash up, eat your breakfast, brush your teeth, get dressed and start it all again.

How many search for the meaning of life and seek the answers to questions other than those in their textbooks?  How many are willing to think about the things they are told and really consider them?  You see, ideas are not meant to be like paintings hung in a museum, not to be touched, just look upon one for awhile and move on to the next because the next person in line is anxious. Great Ideas are like precious diamonds, cut to perfection, meant to be viewed from multiple angles and sides, allowed to reflect the Sun in beautiful patterns on the walls of your mind, mulled over and understood.  The Bible fully chewed, swallowed and digested is the ultimate Food of Wisdom and Truth.  Antony finally got it!

Antony Flew spent most of his life denouncing God and Christianity, but Antony Flew didn't ever entirely close his mind.  One day he picked up the idea of God and allowed that light to pass through it and he saw the beautiful patterns on the walls of his mind and they cut through like laser beams into his very soul.  Antony Flew realized God IS and WAS and WILL ALWAYS BE!   


Letters From the Dead: Antony Flew Posthumously Defends "There is a God" Through Letters Recently Made Public

Author and Christian apologist Anthony Horvath has released letters he received from Antony Flew, world renowned atheist, who abandoned atheism in the years leading up to his death. Flew detailed his journey from atheism to belief in a book that critics contend Christians corrupted for their own interests. Flew's personal correspondence with Horvath undercuts many of the arguments attempting to get into Flew's mind, because Flew's letters themselves offer clarity. The letters have been made available in an e-book.

(PRWEB) September 24, 2012 

Dr. Antony Flew, hailed as the world’s most influential philosophical atheist, abandoned atheism in the years leading up to his death, sending shock waves throughout religious and philosophical communities. He detailed his journey from atheism to belief in a book that critics contend Christians have corrupted to further their own interests. Critics claim that Dr. Flew lost his faculties due to old age and that the book and its arguments were fabricated by a Christian apologist, that is, a defender of the Christian faith

Dr. Flew, who died in 2010, was the foremost advocate for atheism for nearly five decades, taking on such stalwarts of faith as C.S. Lewis, another famous atheist-turned-Christian whom Flew termed "by far the most powerful of Christian apologists for the sixty or more years following his founding of [the Socratic Club]."

Having yet another atheist apologist convert deals a stinging blow to the atheist cause. To this day, the attempt to marginalize Dr. Flew and his conversion rages on.
Richard Dawkins, arguably the most prominent advocate of atheism today, predictably dove into character assassination, along with many others, claiming Dr. Flew was senile and had lost his capacity for clear philosophical argument. This is to be expected from militant atheists such as Dawkins, who openly stated in March 2012 at the Reason Rally that when reason fails to sway someone to reject a god the appropriate tactic is "ridicule and contempt."

(Radar - ridicule and contempt are what Darwinists substitute for evidence.  You are welcome!)

Does the criticism aimed at undoing the influence of "There is a God" have merit? Was Dr. Flew just a senile old man prayed upon and exploited by faith-mongers? Did, Roy Varghese, Christian co-author of "There is a God," put ideas and words in Dr. Flew's mouth? With the release by Anthony Horvath, author, apologist, and executive director of Athanatos Christian Ministries, of personal correspondence predating the public announcement of Dr. Flew's book, critics arguments are shown to be vacuous.
Dr. Flew's correspondence, written by his own hand long before the announcement of his book detailing his 'conversion,' puts to rest many of the assertions leveled by atheist attackers.

In the letters, Flew speaks openly about the forthcoming book, what it would be about, and the points it would make. Horvath's letters conclusively show that many of the examples insinuated to be fabrications of co-authors truly were Dr. Flew's own arguments and illustrations. They are a devastating rebuttal to atheist attacks.
Horvath says, "It is unreasonable to expect Flew to address in detail every charge that would be made about him years before they are made, especially when the number of charges came to rival the number of universes in the multiverse. I do not contend that these letters answer every charge, but there are a fair number of instances where specific challenges made by atheist critics can be decisively fought off."

Horvath has made the letters available in an e-book to set the record straight. He says, "Atheists may not like the fact that a longtime ally deserted them, but that doesn't mean sanity deserted the ally. Follow the evidence; don't denigrate the man."

(Radar - Following the evidence is not something Darwinists enjoy doing.   Their comfort zone consists of the well-defined boundaries of the Darwinist mythology.  Evidence?  They don't need no stinkin' evidence!  A Cambodian Temple has carvings of stegosaurs?  Let's pretend they are hippos.   A human footprint and a dinosaur footprint are found together?  There must have been a dinosaur with a human-like footprint...or a genius created a fake no one can pick apart..or let's forget the whole thing and talk about something else. A T.Rex fossil actually has blood and other remains?  Had to be contamination.  Or bacteria.  Or let's talk about something else again.  How about let's go out and see a movie or something?  Acamabaro figurines are actually quite ancient and depict dinosaurs accurately?  Send down some clown pretending to be an investigator to call them fakes and ignore the facts.  Facts?  Ouch!  Darwinists do not like facts.  Let's go see that movie!) 
Horvath gives one example, where one critic doubts the integrity of Flew's book "There is a God" because it doesn't make reference to the 'Deism of Jefferson' but in his letters, "Flew does reference Deism, but cites Einstein--which is the same illustration the book gives."

The most serious charge made was that Flew was unaware of just how much of the book would be written by the co-author, but in one of the letters he writes, “What this book will also contain is a great deal, indeed by far the larger part from Christian writers.”

Horvath argues, "Pretty much every description of his book given to me by Dr. Flew himself in his letters to me matches up with what came out in the book. It is reasonable to give the rest of the book the benefit of the doubt. If Varghese got these points right, he likely got the rest right, as well."

The e-book, "A Defense of the Integrity of Antony Flew’s 'There is a God' From His Own Letters" is available for the Kindle and the Nook or directly from Horvath's web page.

Anthony Horvath
Athanatos Christian Ministries
Email Information


I still hate the fact that Christopher Hitchens died an atheist!   Hate the idea, he was a good sort with a bad religion, the kind of man who may well have followed in Antony Flew's footsteps had he lived longer and considered the arguments of Christians a few more years.   But he died too young and without God.  

But Antony Flew absolutely rejected atheism and became a Christian.   You may not like the concept but it is one of those uncomfortable facts.  The kind of fact that is not open to question.   Christopher Hitchens and Antony Flew are dead.   Their bodies were left behind.  Both men know what is on the other side of life but, sadly, the knowledge is good news to only one of them...

Darwinism is atheism plus neo-evolution, an elixer designed to take away all those pesky evidences of creation that cause a person to realize that there absolutely MUST be a God to have input all this design and information and perfectly balanced physical laws to allow for a planet where mankind could observe the Universe and comprehend it well enough to make great use of the various materials of Earth.  There MUST be a God to have created life, because it cannot create itself.  There MUST be a God to have created all matter and energy, for matter and energy do not create themselves.  There MUST be a God because there is logic and reason and a Universe that can be studied and understood.  Not a mishmosh of randomness that would be the expected result of some accidental miraculous explosion of nothing into everything with no cause and no purpose.  You really want to bet your life on that?

You are alive, you draw one breath after another and your heart beats.  It's not too late for you to pick up that diamond that is the idea of the God of the Bible and hold it up to examine.  Look through every facet, let the sunlight shine through it, forget the dark mutterings of naysayers like Richard Dawkins and really give God a chance to get to your heart as he did to me, as he did to Antony.   It's not too late!

The Sunlight of reason leads to the Son of God!

2 Peter 3:9 - English Standard Version (ESV)

The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

The 2012 American Election - a picture is worth a thousand words!

Breitbart - One Voice Silenced, Millions Awakened

100 Percent FED Up

All images are from Facebook or previous posts.  Previously used images were credited at that time.  All images are relevant to the election happening on November 6th, 2012 in the United States of America.  Anyone who claims an image, I will retroactively add the attribution!

Among the likely contributors to Facebook images:

No Lapdog Media
Chicks on the Right
The Liberal Offender
Image Blitz
100 Percent FED Up

Ask yourself this:

The Romneys gave over FOUR MILLION DOLLARS to charity last year. Meanwhile Joe Biden and Barack Obama (who is a multi-millionaire) listed their tax returns here. The Obama Socialists believe in taking from the rich and giving to the poor. So why do the Romneys give TWENTY-THREE TIMES AS MUCH MONEY TO CHARITY AS THE OBAMAS AND BIDENS PUT TOGETHER???!!!!

Can anyone name a business that Joe Biden or Barack Obama started or rescued from going out of business?   Have Biden or Obama had a real managment job?   Both of them are simply lawyers who were identified as politician material and manaaged to fairly quickly get themselves a cushy position and then a political office.   They've failed miserably to oversee the United States of America, steering the Ship of State onto the rocks of debt and falling credit ratings and high unemployment.   Our embassies are being attacked and our personnel killed by terrorists,  our troops in Afghanistan die at a frightening rate (under Barack Obama about twice as many Americans have been killed in Afghanistan than under eight years of Geoge W Bush).  The total as of October 5th is shown on the badge on the left sidebar of this blog...1467 to 575!

The difference between the two sides is clear!

Image Blitz

About the Democratic attacks on Governor Romney's tax returns?

This morning, Gov. and Mrs. Romney filed their 2011 tax return with the IRS. At 3:00pm today, the Romney for President campaign will be posting the 2011 return online.

The complete 2011 tax return, with full schedules, statements, and attachments, will be made available with all other previously-disclosed information at

Also posted will be a notarized letter from the Romneys’ tax preparer, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (PWC), giving a summary of tax rates from the Romneys’ tax returns for the 20-year period of 1990-2009.

In advance of the posting of these new documents, I wanted to provide some top-line details.

Regarding the newly-filed 2011 Tax Return:

  • In 2011, the Romneys paid $1,935,708 in taxes on $13,696,951 in mostly investment income.

  • The Romneys’ effective tax rate for 2011 was 14.1%.

  • The Romneys donated $4,020,772 to charity in 2011, amounting to nearly 30% of their income.

  • The Romneys claimed a deduction for $2.25 million of those charitable contributions.

  • The Romneys’ generous charitable donations in 2011 would have significantly reduced their tax obligation for the year. The Romneys thus limited their deduction of charitable contributions to conform to the Governor's statement in August, based upon the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13% in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.

As with the 2010 tax return, the 2011 tax return will appear as four separate documents. It includes Governor and Mrs. Romney's Form 1040 as well as three underlying Massachusetts trusts detailing the sources of their income. Those are The W. Mitt Romney Blind Trust, The Ann D. Romney Blind Trust, and The Romney Family Trust.

The investments within the trusts are managed on a blind basis by me, the trustee. I have sole responsibility for making, holding and disposing of the investments.

Regarding the PWC letter covering the Romneys’ tax filings over 20 years, from 1990 – 2009:

  • In each year during the entire 20-year period, the Romneys owed both state and federal income taxes.

  • Over the entire 20-year period, the average annual effective federal tax rate was 20.20%.

  • Over the entire 20-year period, the lowest annual effective federal personal tax rate was 13.66%.

  • Over the entire 20-year period, the Romneys gave to charity an average of 13.45% of their adjusted gross income.

  • Over the entire 20-year period, the total federal and state taxes owed plus the total charitable donations deducted represented 38.49% of total AGI.

During the 20-year period covered by the PWC letter, Gov. and Mrs. Romney paid 100 percent of the taxes that they owed.

Finally, in addition to new documents related to tax filings, the campaign will also be posting on the same website physician letters for both Gov. Romney and Rep. Ryan, making public their current state of health.

After you have reviewed all of the newly-posted documents, you may have further questions. The campaign asks that you direct them to an e-mail account set up for that purpose. That e-mail address is returns @

Thank you.

R. Bradford Malt is a partner at Ropes & Gray, LLP. He has been the trustee of the Romney’s blind trust since 2003.

The Romneys gave over FOUR MILLION DOLLARS to charity last year.   Meanwhile Joe Biden and Barack Obama (who is a multi-millionaire) listed their tax returns here.  The Obama Socialists believe in taking from the rich and giving to the poor.  So why do the Romneys give TWENTY-THREE TIMES AS MUCH MONEY TO CHARITY AS THE OBAMAS AND BIDENS PUT TOGETHER???!!!! 

From Facebook

From Facebook

From Facebook

From LibertyGuage via Liberal Offender

From Facebook

From Facebook

From Facebook

 Previously attributed from the Spring.   It is much worse now of course!

From ABO 2012

From the New Boston Tea Party

Cartoonist signature in BRH corner

Cartoonist signature in ULH corner

So then how about those gas prices, eh?


Yes, sad but true...

NoLapDog credit

Oh, and let's not forget the Democrat-sponsored Occupy Wall Street crowd:

Cartoonist signature in ULH corner

Cartoonist signature in ULH corner