Although dating methods have been discussed OFTEN on this blog, I think it is time to remind readers of the vast amount of evidence that falsifies long ages that Darwinists pretend is settled science. Nope, in fact you would have a hard time finding good evidence for any dating claim Darwinists use to promote an ancient Earth, Sun, Solar System or Universe. They have light years on their side, but that is not going to be helpful to them for long. As we translate more ancient texts and discover more about the Universe the idea of a recently created and stretched-out Universe is going to trickle down to the man in the street. Give it ten years, maybe? Twenty years max, unless of course we become a dictatorship and the Thought Police take control of information. Rots of ruck to us all in that case. But let us go on the hypothesis that the United States will remain a true Republic rather than a dystopian nightmare, shall we?
Ian Juby can tell you that the Solar System is pretty darned young after all!
The Creation scientist who predicted the kinds of magnetic fields we would find when we explored the planets, Dr. Russell Humphreys, is also a man who presented an hypothesis that explains the apparent old age of a young Universe. Not sure if I buy what he thinks may well be true about creation itself, but he was on the money concerning the Solar System so far. Ian points out a few things about the planets and moons that are at odds with evolution, but Spike Psarris has couple of very informative DVDs out with visuals from various space missions and the science of what those missions have discovered about the planets and moons and stars. Spike was a member of the Army Space team but has been led to inform the public about what is REALLY true about astronomy.
This article, below, is from 2009 but is still quite good: