The last post in the series was this:
Faith versus Evidence. Darwinism versus Creationism. Part Two is WHERE DID EVERYTHING COME FROM?????
We Won't Get Fooled Again!!!
Well, will ya?
Incredible time in the history of The Who - if John Entwistle is not the best bass player in rock history, WHO IS? Roger Daltrey is a great front man with vocal range, Pete Townsend a great guitarist and showman and Keith Moon is sometimes called the greatest rock drummer ever. I think maybe Neil Peart and John Bonham and Carl Palmer have to at least be considered there. In any event, the band was a group of great musicians who blended together to make amazing music and were a powerful stage presence. They will help me help you understand that Darwinism is an unscientific faith and not supported with evidence, this time concerning the origin of life. Remember, Darwinists must resort to only natural answers as they claim that there is no supernatural God...
2) Any Scientific Law that has never been disproved will remain law. I will not accept any arguments that claim that the Laws of Thermodynamics have ever been demonstrably broken or that the Law of Biogenesis has ever been broken. There is no evidence that would support removing the "Law" from these laws.
3) I will be willing to argue evidence. But commenters have to bring evidence to the table. Simply either saying "nyuh-uh" will not be acceptable. Also, the evidence-free appeal to some opinion held by some Darwinist somewhere is not acceptable. Simply saying that "Joe Blow has an interesting hypothesis" is not evidence. Sure, the check is in the mail! Your wishful thinking is not evidence. Bring evidence or be ignored and actually spotlighted. Trust me, commenter spotlighting has happened in the past and it is going to be done again in the very near future. So if you do not want empty arguments on page one and torn to shreds, do not make empty arguments. Are we clear?