Search This Blog

Monday, September 05, 2011

Holocaust past and present. A reminder of the cost of abandoning God and submitting to Darwinist philosophies.

Part three of my series on The Evils of Darwinism actually involves asking Christians and pseudo-Christians to look into the mirror. It will deal with matters more familiar to Christians than to atheopaths.  I had already written most of it before reading the recent comments threads.   So much denial, so much equivocation, so much empty derision and ignorance.   Not sure whether some of the commenters really believe the things they say or not, furthermore, not sure which situation would be worse for the commenter.   Is it better to be among the brainwashed or one committed to propagandizing?   Probably the latter is far worse.

It is obvious that Darwinists are willing to lie or pretend ignorance concerning the direct connection between Darwinism and Hitler's Holocaust, not to mention the wholesale slaughter and/or subjugation of millions of "colored" peoples during the 19th and 20th Century both before, during and after the Great Wars. Stalin. Mao. There are many men of remarkable evil. So before I move forward to speak to Christians about Darwinism and the faith, I am reminding everyone just exactly where Darwinism leads us...genocide, murder, atrocities and whereas the post below focuses on Hitler in the 20th Century, there is no doubt a Planned Parenthood near you where innocents continue to be slaughtered and tossed aside. Mindless, heartless slaughter of innocent lives will continue until someone is willing to acknowledge that Darwinism is wrong and that human life has God-given intrinsic value.   The straight line from Darwinism to Eugenics to abortion is as clear and obvious as the one that leads from Darwin to Hitler to Dachau. 

WHERE DARWINISM HAS TAKEN US TODAY

So, this is to remind you of the holocaust that is happening today because of Darwinist philosophy and then the most famous Holocaust of all, also a result of Darwinism.  All of you who support abortion and vote for those who support abortion?  You are all in your own ways little Hitlers, supporting the wholesale slaughter of innocents that is going on right now.  The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform has the recently published raw numbers:

WORLDWIDE

Number of abortions per year: Approximately 42 Million
Number of abortions per day:
Approximately 115,000


Where abortions occur:
83% of all abortions are obtained in developing countries and 17% occur in developed countries.

© Copyright 1996-2008, The Alan Guttmacher Institute. (www.agi-usa.org)

Do you have the guts to actually look at the pictures of the innocent dead? 

How about proof of the humanity of tiny fetuses?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Medical Testimony

A new human being comes into existence during the process of fertilization.

Page Summary:

It is false to claim that no one knows when life begins and dishonest to argue that abortion does not kill a human being.
Every new life begins at conception. This is an irrefutable fact of biology. It is true for animals and true for humans. When considered alongside the law of biogenesis – that every species reproduces after its own kind – we can draw only one conclusion in regard to abortion. No matter what the circumstances of conception, no matter how far along in the pregnancy, abortion always ends the life of an individual human being. Every honest abortion advocate concedes this simple fact.

Faye Wattleton, the longest reigning president of the largest abortion provider in the world – Planned Parenthood – argued as far back as 1997 that everyone already knows that abortion kills. She proclaims the following in an interview with Ms. Magazine:
I think we have deluded ourselves into believing that people don't know that abortion is killing. So any pretense that abortion is not killing is a signal of our ambivalence, a signal that we cannot say yes, it kills a fetus.1
Naomi Wolf, a prominent feminist author and abortion supporter, makes a similar concession when she writes:
Clinging to a rhetoric about abortion in which there is no life and no death, we entangle our beliefs in a series of self-delusions, fibs and evasions. And we risk becoming precisely what our critics charge us with being: callous, selfish and casually destructive men and women who share a cheapened view of human life...we need to contextualize the fight to defend abortion rights within a moral framework that admits that the death of a fetus is a real death.2
David Boonin, in his book, A Defense of Abortion, makes this startling admission:
In the top drawer of my desk, I keep [a picture of my son]. This picture was taken on September 7, 1993, 24 weeks before he was born. The sonogram image is murky, but it reveals clear enough a small head tilted back slightly, and an arm raised up and bent, with the hand pointing back toward the face and the thumb extended out toward the mouth. There is no doubt in my mind that this picture, too, shows [my son] at a very early stage in his physical development. And there is no question that the position I defend in this book entails that it would have been morally permissible to end his life at this point.3
Peter Singer, contemporary philosopher and public abortion advocate, joins the chorus in his book, Practical Ethics. He writes:
It is possible to give ‘human being’ a precise meaning. We can use it as equivalent to ‘member of the species Homo sapiens’. Whether a being is a member of a given species is something that can be determined scientifically, by an examination of the nature of the chromosomes in the cells of living organisms. In this sense there is no doubt that from the first moments of its existence an embryo conceived from human sperm and eggs is a human being.4
Bernard Nathanson co-founded one of the most influential abortion advocacy groups in the world (NARAL) and once served as medical director for the largest abortion clinic in America. In 1974, he wrote an article for the New England Journal of Medicine in which he states, "There is no longer serious doubt in my mind that human life exists within the womb from the very onset of pregnancy..."5 Some years later, he would reiterate:
There is simply no doubt that even the early embryo is a human being. All its genetic coding and all its features are indisputably human. As to being, there is no doubt that it exists, is alive, is self-directed, and is not the the same being as the mother–and is therefore a unified whole.6
Don't miss the significance of these acknowledgements. Prominent defenders of abortion rights publicly admit that abortion kills human beings. They are not saying that abortion is morally defensible because it doesn't kill a distinct human entity. They are admitting that abortion does kill a distinct human entity, but argue it is morally defensible anyway. We'll get to their arguments later, but the point here is this: There is simply no debate among honest, informed people that abortion kills distinctly human beings.
 
The problem is, Roe vs. Wade, the landmark 1973 verdict which legalized abortion in the U.S. is actually built on the claim that there's no way to say for certain whether or not abortion kills because no one can say for certain when life begins. Justice Harry Blackmun, who authored the majority opinion wrote:
The judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to... resolve the difficult question of when life begins... since those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus.7
Justice Blackmun's assertion is a ridiculous one, at least as it applies to the field of medicine. Dr. Nathanson had this to say about the ruling: 
Of course, I was pleased with Justice Harry Blackmun's abortion decisions, which were an unbelievably sweeping triumph for our cause, far broader than our 1970 victory in New York or the advances since then. I was pleased with Blackmun's conclusions, that is. I could not plumb the ethical or medical reasoning that had produced the conclusions. Our final victory had been propped up on a misreading of obstetrics, gynecology, and embryology, and that's a dangerous way to win.8
Dr. Nathanson would eventually abandon his support for elective abortion and note that "the basics [of prenatal development] were well-known to human embryology at the time the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 1973 rulings, even though the rulings made no use of them."9 In biological terms, life's beginning is a settled fact. Individual human life begins at fertilization, and there are all sorts of authoritative, public resources to prove this. Consider the evidence below:

MODERN TEACHING TEXTS ON EMBRYOLOGY / PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT

The Developing Human "Human development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual." - "A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo)."
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Medical Embryology "Development begins with fertilization, the process by which the male gamete, the sperm, and the femal gamete, the oocyte, unite to give rise to a zygote."

T.W. Sadler, Langman's Medical Embryology, 10th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. p. 11.
Before We Are Born "[The zygote], formed by the union of an oocyte and a sperm, is the beginning of a new human being."

Keith L. Moore, Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2008. p. 2.
Human Embryology and Teratology "Although life is a continuous process, fertilization (which, incidentally, is not a 'moment') is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new genetically distinct human organism is formed when the chromosomes of the male and female pronuclei blend in the oocyte."

Ronan O'Rahilly and Fabiola Müller, Human Embryology and Teratology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001. p. 8.
Human Embryology "Human embryos begin development following the fusion of definitive male and female gametes during fertilization... This moment of zygote formation may be taken as the beginning or zero time point of embryonic development."

William J. Larsen, Essentials of Human Embryology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1998. pp. 1, 14.

OLDER TEACHING TEXTS ON EMBRYOLOGY / PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT

Patten's Human Embryology "It is the penetration of the ovum by a spermatozoan and resultant mingling of the nuclear material each brings to the union that constitues the culmination of the process of fertilization and marks the initiation of the life of a new individual."

Clark Edward Corliss, Patten's Human Embryology: Elements of Clinical Development. New York: McGraw Hill, 1976. p. 30.
Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics "The term conception refers to the union of the male and female pronuclear elements of procreation from which a new living being develops." - "The zygote thus formed represents the beginning of a new life."

J.P. Greenhill and E.A. Friedman, Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1974. pp. 17, 23.
Pathology of the Fetus and Infant "Every time a sperm cell and ovum unite a new being is created which is alive and will continue to live unless its death is brought about by some specific condition."

E.L. Potter and J.M. Craig, Pathology of the Fetus and the Infant, 3rd edition. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1975. p. vii.

GENERAL AUDIENCE TEXTS ON EMBRYOLOGY / PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT

Beginning Life "Every baby begins life within the tiny globe of the mother's egg... It is beautifully translucent and fragile and it encompasses the vital links in which life is carried from one generation to the next. Within this tiny sphere great events take place. When one of the father's sperm cells, like the ones gathered here around the egg, succeeds in penetrating the egg and becomes united with it, a new life can begin."

Geraldine Lux Flanagan, Beginning Life. New York: DK, 1996. p. 13.

PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT VIDEOS

The Biology of Prenatal Development "Biologically speaking, human development begins at fertilization."

The Biology of Prenatal Develpment, National Geographic, 2006.
In the Womb "The two cells gradually and gracefully become one. This is the moment of conception, when an individual's unique set of DNA is created, a human signature that never existed before and will never be repeated."

In the Womb, National Geographic, 2005.

EXPERT TESTIMONY RELATING TO LIFE'S BEGINNING

In 1981, a United States Senate judiciary subcommittee received the following testimony from a collection of medical experts (Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, Report, 97th Congress, 1st Session, 1981):

"It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive...It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception." 

Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth
Harvard University Medical School 

"I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception."

Dr. Alfred M. Bongioanni
Professor of Pediatrics and Obstetrics, University of Pennsylvania 

"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being. [It] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion...it is plain experimental evidence. Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception." 

Dr. Jerome LeJeune
Professor of Genetics, University of Descartes 


"By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception." 

Professor Hymie Gordon
Mayo Clinic 

"The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter – the beginning is conception." 

Dr. Watson A. Bowes
University of Colorado Medical School
The official Senate report reached this conclusion:
Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being - a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.10
The American Medical Association (AMA) declared as far back as 1857 (referenced in the Roe. vs. Wade opinion) that "the independent and actual existence of the child before birth, as a living being” is a matter of objective science. They deplored the “popular ignorance...that the foetus is not alive till after the period of quickening.”

Why have all the teaching texts and so many medical experts come to this same conclusion? Because there are simple ways to measure whether something is alive and whether something is human. If Faye Wattleton is correct and everyone already knows that abortion kills a human being, they have come to that knowledge in spite of the information circulated by Planned Parenthood and the rest of the abortion-rights community. The abortion section of the Planned Parenthood website explains abortion this way:
"Abortion is a safe and legal way for women to end pregnancy."11
How's that for thorough? Maybe they just assume that the method for ending the pregnancy is so obvious (killing the human being living in the womb) that it hardly bears mentioning. More likely, Planned Parenthood is simply accommodating the general ignorance which believes abortion to be the mere removal of potential human life, rather than the actual killing of existing human life.

Biologically speaking, every abortion at every point in the pregnancy ends the life of a genetically-distinct human being.
    Footnotes
  1. Faye Wattleton, “Speaking Frankly,” Ms., May / June 1997, Volume VII, Number 6, 67.
  2. Naomi Wolf, “Our Bodies, Our Souls,” The New Republic, October 16, 1995, 26.
  3. David Boonin, A Defense of Abortion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), xiv.
  4. Peter Singer, Practical Ethics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 2008), 85-86.
  5. Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., “Deeper into Abortion,” New England Journal of Medicine, November 28, 1974, Vol. 291, No. 22: 1189-1190.
  6. Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., The Hand of God (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1996), 131.
  7. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
  8. Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., Aborting America (New York: Pinnacle Books, 1979), 163.
  9. Ibid, 201.
  10. Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981, 7.
  11. Planned Parenthood, Abortion, http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/abortion-4260.asp (Sep 21, 2010).
POSSIBLE OBJECTION: Even if an embryo is technically alive at fertilization, it's still just a clump of microscopic cells. Until the heart is beating or the brain is functioning, women should be free to have an abortion.

TO LEARN OUR RESPONSE, CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE: Prenatal Development
FOR FURTHER STUDY:
LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK:

A REMINDER OF WHERE DARWINISM HAS TAKEN US BEFORE


World War II: The Holocaust





The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. "Holocaust" is a word of Greek origin meaning "sacrifice by fire." The Nazis, who came to power in Germany in January 1933, believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews, deemed "inferior," were an alien threat to the so-called German racial community.
During the era of the Holocaust, German authorities also targeted other groups because of their perceived "racial inferiority": Roma (Gypsies), the disabled, and some of the Slavic peoples (Poles, Russians, and others). Other groups were persecuted on political, ideological, and behavioral grounds, among them Communists, Socialists, Jehova´s Witnesses, and homosexuals.





WHAT WAS THE HOLOCAUST?

In 1933, the Jewish population of Europe stood at over nine million. Most European Jews lived in countries that Nazi Germany would occupy or influence during World War II. By 1945, the Germans and their collaborators killed nearly two out of every three European Jews as part of the "Final Solution," the Nazi policy to murder the Jews of Europe. Although Jews, whom the Nazis deemed a priority danger to Germany, were the primary victims of Nazi racism, other victims included some 200,000 Roma (Gypsies). At least 200,000 mentally or physically disabled patients, mainly Germans, living in institutional settings, were murdered in the so-called Euthanasia Program.
As Nazi tyranny spread across Europe, the Germans and their collaborators persecuted and murdered millions of other people. Between two and three million Soviet prisoners of war were murdered or died of starvation, disease, neglect, or maltreatment. The Germans targeted the non-Jewish Polish intelligentsia for killing, and deported millions of Polish and Soviet civilians for forced labor in Germany or in occupied Poland, where these individuals worked and often died under deplorable conditions. From the earliest years of the Nazi regime, German authorities persecuted homosexuals and others whose behavior did not match prescribed social norms. German police officials targeted thousands of political opponents (including Communists, Socialists, and trade unionists) and religious dissidents (such as Jehovah's Witnesses). Many of these individuals died as a result of incarceration and maltreatment.







ADMINISTRATION OF THE "FINAL SOLUTION" 

In the early years of the Nazi regime, the National Socialist government established concentration camps to detain real and imagined political and ideological opponents. Increasingly in the years before the outbreak of war, SS and police officials incarcerated Jews, Roma, and other victims of ethnic and racial hatred in these camps. To concentrate and monitor the Jewish population as well as to facilitate later deportation of the Jews, the Germans and their collaborators created ghettos, transit camps, and forced-labor camps for Jews during the war years. The German authorities also established numerous forced-labor camps, both in the so-called Greater German Reich and in German-occupied territory, for non-Jews whose labor the Germans sought to exploit.
Following the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941,Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing units) and, later, militarized battalions of Order Police officials, moved behind German lines to carry out mass-murder operations against Jews, Roma, and Soviet state and Communist Party officials. German SS and police units, supported by units of the Wehrmacht and the Waffen SS, murdered more than a million Jewish men, women, and children, and hundreds of thousands of others. Between 1941 and 1944, Nazi German authorities deported millions of Jews from Germany, from occupied territories, and from the countries of many of its Axis allies to ghettos and to killing centers, often called extermination camps, where they were murdered in specially developed gassing facilities.







THE END OF THE HOLOCAUST


In the final months of the war, SS guards moved camp inmates by train or on forced marches, often called “death marches”, in an attempt to prevent the Allied liberation of large numbers of prisoners. As Allied forces moved across Europe in a series of offensives against Germany, they began to encounter and liberate concentration camp prisoners, as well as prisoners en route by forced march from one camp to another. The marches continued until May 7, 1945, the day the German armed forces surrendered unconditionally to the Allies. For the western Allies, World War II officially ended in Europe on the next day, May 8 (V-E Day), while Soviet forces announced their “Victory Day” on May 9, 1945.
In the aftermath of the Holocaust, many of the survivors found shelter in displaced persons (DP) camps administered by the Allied powers. Between 1948 and 1951, almost 700,000 Jews emigrated to Israel, including 136,000 Jewish displaced persons from Europe. Other Jewish DPs emigrated to the United States and other nations. The last DP camp closed in 1957. The crimes committed during the Holocaust devastated most European Jewish communities and eliminated hundreds of Jewish communities in occupied eastern Europe entirely.

The Holocaust that changed the World












Holocaust, Hitler´s Concentration Camp





The Holocaust in  Color







This is unspeakable evil.   Whether it be one of Hitler's henchmen marching unwanted "lesser" human beings into gas chambers or an abortionist cutting a baby to pieces and vaccuuming out the child's remains, it is evil.  Do you think seeing pictures of a bunch of chopped-up babies is any more pleasant, any more inhumane?

If I could mandate it, I would force every Darwinist to go into an abortion clinic and watch as a doctor attacks and murders a baby within the mother's womb.   I would make him/her look at the remains of the child.  Yes, even in extremely early pregnancy the tiny hands and feet are recognizable.   You would see that the videos were wrong.    It is not that it can never happen again, rather, it is that it keeps on happening.  

It just keeps on happening. 

11 comments:

anonymouse said...

Fear is the mindkiller.

Anonymous whatsit said...

Interestingly, Radar's rhetoric re. "Darwinists" is quite similar to antisemitic rants and as such, with a few minor word substitutions, wouldn't be out of place in a Nazi pamphlet of the 1930s.

Antisemitism is grounded in religious prejudices and intolerance, as is Radar's constant demonization of atheists, secular humanists etc.

Anonymous whatsit said...

"It is obvious that Darwinists are willing to lie or pretend ignorance concerning the direct connection between Darwinism and Hitler's Holocaust"

Nonsense. The Nazis didn't care for Darwin's theories one bit, which is why they banned any books relating to his theories. It's not hard to see why: the notion of common descent has the Aryan Master Race as a close relative of the Jew, the Negro, the gypsy, and even the chimp and gorilla. Doesn't really fit in with that chosen master race scenario, does it?

To the extent that "evolution" was behind the thinking of Nazis' extermination of Jews, gypsies etc., it was at the level of microevolution as it has been known to man since ancient times, namely animal husbandry - an aspect of evolution that even Radar and his fellow YECs subscribe to.

Hawkeye® said...

Radar,
As you yourself have said before and in a dozen different ways, Darwinism creates the false mindset that God does not exist, life came to being without God, life "evolved" without God's intervention, and that humanity is nothing more than primordial "goo" albeit somehow "self-arranged" into a far more complicated structure.

Therefore, without the need for God, man can quietly discard Him along with the morality that He demands. God is Life. Life is precious is in His eyes. Human life is more precious to Him than all the rest, because we are created in His own image. Whenever we destroy human life, we destroy a small reflection of God.

Gen 2:7 - then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.

Gen 1:27 - So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

Gen 9:6 - Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image.

1Co 1:30a - He [God] is the source of your life...

Ro 4:17b - God... gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist.

Col 1:15-16 - He [Jesus] is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation; for in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible... all things were created through him and for him.

John 1:1-4a
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God; 3 all things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made. 4 In him was life...

John 5:26 - For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself,

John 10:10 - The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.

John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.

John 15:13 - Greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

Mat 12:20 - he [Jesus] will not break a bruised reed or quench a smoldering wick...

Ezekiel 23:36-39a
36 The LORD said to me: "Son of man, will you judge Oho'lah and Ohol'ibah? Then declare to them their abominable deeds. 37 For they have committed adultery, and blood is upon their hands; with their idols they have committed adultery; and they have even offered up to them for food the sons whom they had borne to me. 38 Moreover this they have done to me: they have defiled my sanctuary on the same day and profaned my sabbaths. 39 For when they had slaughtered their children in sacrifice to their idols, on the same day they came into my sanctuary to profane it.

Hawkeye® said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
anonymouse said...

"Human life is more precious to Him than all the rest, because we are created in His own image."

Since you're the one citing Bible passages, you should know better. Read the Old Testament; when it comes to killing people God makes Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot look like amateurs...

Anonymous said...

What does ANY of this have to do with Darwinism?

Jon Woolf said...

It has nothing to do with Darwin's actual theory of evolution.

It has everything to do with the illusion of "The Evils Of Modern Science" that Radar's cult-leaders have instilled in him, to keep him a fearful, faithful sheep and not an independent man.

AmericanVet said...

Funny that Woolf of all people should ascribe to me a cult and having leaders. I am independent and do not have any leader on this blog other than perhaps God. Woolf sounds like a press release from Eugenie Scott.

Ideas have consequences. I am clearly showing the consequences of Darwinism as a philosophy. It becomes an excuse, no, it becomes a vehicle for the vilest of actions. As Darwninism denies God and declares man as nothing more than the most evolved animal, it is inherently bereft of morality. Thus the strong overcome the weak and claim that science gives them the right to do so.

AmericanVet said...

As to demonizing people, I am simply giving you the historical facts. These men did these things and stated these reasons for doing them. The Kaiser, Stalin and Hitler all called upon Darwin as part and parcel to their drive to murder people. You add Darwinism and Eugenics and/or Marxism and tens of millions of people die. Facts are facts. You call it demonizing, I call it history.

anonymouse said...

Radar,

EVEN IF all these things were done because of 'Darwinism', that doesn't prove the theory of evolution wrong.
However, the fact that you need to resort to FUD tactics (in addition to censorship) proves that you have no scientific evidence whatsoever to prove the theory of evolution wrong.

Concession accepted!