Search This Blog

Monday, February 06, 2012

Flu plus Super Bowl = guest youtubes Falsifying Evolution and of course the great Ian Juby for the win!

The contest and winner!!!



A favorite finalist



Second favorite finalist




Ian Juby pwns on!



While recuperating from illness, a couple of days of youtubes...probably tomorrow as well.  But plenty to digest.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

It speaks volumes that you have to hide behind other people's words instead of defending your own arguments.

radar said...

Nice. I am sick and going to doctor and a troll still makes an ad hominem attack while failing to address the evidence. Typical.

Anonymous whatsit said...

Where's the ad hominem exactly? I don't see one.

Anonymous said...

Typical of your blog posts perhaps, Radar. How many times have you indulged in ad hominems (actual ad hominems - try looking it up sometime) while running away from the evidence? Your blog is full of it.

radar said...

I suppose you all wish I WOULD run away. Not gonna happen.

Anonymous said...

"There is no refutation of Darwinian evolution in existence. If a refutation ever were to come about, it would come from a scientist, and not an idiot."

This was Dawkins comment on the "bananaman", Ray Comfort, but it clearly applies to Juby as well.

List of things Radar doesn't/can't understand,

Evolution
Atheism
Geology
Astronomy
Abiogenesis
Argument from Incredulity
Ad Homenim
...

I'd keep going but I really don't have time.

And what does you being sick have to do with anything, BTW?

-Canucklehead.

radar said...

The wise man will tend to disagree with Richard Dawkins when the subject of science comes up.

Canucklehead's attack on my knowledge is appreciated, thank you! As usual it is a fact-free personal attack, typifying the Darwinist response when there is no evidence to help them out. The spin of trolls is pretty obvious after awhile.

As always, I will put up my blog posts against the ad hominem attacks of trolls. Furthermore, posting Ian Juby videos is not "hiding behind" anything, it is publishing information. Remember information? That stuff that you and Woolf and all the Darwinist horses and all the Darwinist men cannot find a natural source for...yeah, that!

Also, my arguments are made to cause you Darwinists to try to defend your fairy tales. I do not have to defend what is presented as evidence. It is attributed and logically presented to the public and often referencing secular sources. You try to make it about me, but actually it is all about the religion of naturalism and the desperate need of naturalists to try to use scientism as a cover for their lack of evidence and long list of destroyed arguments.

But believe what you like. You still draw breath so you have time to change your mind. It is a gift, do not waste it.

Anonymous whatsit said...

"I suppose you all wish I WOULD run away. Not gonna happen."

On the contrary, you're a useful real-life caricature of a religious fundamentalist who makes irrational arguments and can't face opposing arguments. Just like Joseph Mastropaolo, you're a poor ambassador, and the more you rant, the worse you make your side look (except for the already converted, of course).

So I applaud your tenacity. "Not gonna happen", yay!

radar said...

whatsit, I am going to tell Bad Horse on you!

Anonymous said...

Radar says,

"Canucklehead's attack on my knowledge is appreciated, thank you! As usual it is a fact-free personal attack, typifying the Darwinist response when there is no evidence to help them out."

Um, you do a perfectly fine job of demonstrating just how out of touch you are with the subjects I list above. And if my post is "fact free" as you say, why don't you define Evolution for us and prove me wrong. Don't make me dare you Radar.

-Canucklehead.