Piltdown thanks us, but actually I wish to thank HIM for spreading the word, alerting me and getting so many folks involved this year! Thanks "Uncle Pilty!"
Ideas have consequences. Your basic assumptions about life begin you from a starting point and point you in a direction. You can change directions and you can change presuppositions. But the longer you go the wrong way, the farther you must travel to get to where you need to go.
Darwinism makes me think of the Hitchcock movie "Strangers On A Train" in which two men have the desire to kill someone off but only one of them actually has the predisposition to do it. In the movie, one man carries out the murder and the other gets cold feet. But consider the plan being followed through properly and that two men would kill the person the other wished to be gone? Each would have airtight alibis for the time of the murder they would be suspected of pulling off and their tenuous connection would be unlikely to be detected, so both would apparently succeed in their plot and escape justice. But suppose that the murders took place in the early 1990's and some cold case detective finds DNA evidence and armed with 21st Century science begins to track down the match to that biological signature. It might take years, but once the detective finds the owner of the DNA and begins to question him, the entire plot is eventually going to be unraveled, because the new suspect would be linked to yet another murder and surely would confess to obtain a lighter sentence by naming his partner in crime. Such is Darwinism. It is only going to last while people are not looking at the evidence and simply accepting the stories about the evidence. Once you actually see ALL the evidence then things fall into place.
Charles Darwin could not conceive of the cell as more complex than all the factories and machines of his native England. Most folks didn't know that Lyell and Haeckel were outright liars. The 19th Century man did not have a huge accumulation of fossils nor did marvelous inventions like the electron microscope happen until generations later. Ignorance mixed with hatred of God and the desire to have some kind of logical reason to reject Creationism was of utmost importance to men like Darwin and Huxley and they succeeded in pulling off a masterful con job on the world. Perhaps the greatest folly is perpetrated by those who believe the foolishness themselves? But after so many decades of being aware of the complexity of the cell, the magnificent coding of DNA, the interdependent workings of cell with DNA and ATP or even knowing all about the life cycle of the Monarch Butterfly? No scientist in the world is innocent who perpetuates this fraud!
Yes, Darwinists now are much like magicians. Magicians really don't saw people in half or make an elephant disappear or pull rabbits out of their hats. They use sleight-of-hand and carefully crafted orchestration of movements and unseen mechanisms. We have been tricked, as if by a magician, as Darwinism has called upon us to look HERE while the evidence is over THERE and it is fatal to Darwinism! Not only is it a sad truth, it is an amazing one! So many Darwinists have to realize the preponderance of evidence is against them and yet they persevere and continue to stick with their increasingly unbelievable attempt at subtefuge. No magicians actually do magic and none of them believe that they do it. We go to magic shows wanting to be fooled and believe what is incredible.
But science is not like a magic show, at least it ought not be. We should not expect to be lied to and fooled when we go to science to try to understand how things work. So why should we stand for being lied to and fooled when we wonder where everything comes from and why? You see, there is a place where science and philosophy are connected. It is at the intersection of origins street and purpose avenue. Where the Universe came from also comes with the question of why and not just how. When we ask why we are here and how we came to be here, we find ourselves asking the scientist, the philosopher and the man of faith. The man of faith in God has known that God created all along, the philosophers run the gamut from A to Z and the scientist? The scientist once assumed that God created and investigated how the created things worked. This is how science advanced from superstition and supposition to multiple disciplines of study and accomplishment. Now we have scientists who assume that no God exists and irrationally seek order within a Universe they believe popped randomly from nothing for no purpose by no plan. Evidence has been cast aside in favor of fairy tales. So now the cultural myths of isolated third-world tribes make about as much sense as does Stephen Hawking and vice-versa. Hawking is just as ludicrous as Mongo the Witch Doctor, only with better math skills.
We simply need to look away from all the propaganda and ignore the sizzle and look carefully at the steak. The steak turns out to be a wad of paper towels soaked in hamburger grease!
Darwinism has almost no evidence to support it but lots of supporters, in fact protectors, who hide their cherished belief behind a wall of propaganda and censorship and publicity and outrageous lies. As we learn more about organisms and the Universe and the Solar System, each new piece of evidence begins to fall on the side of design and a Creator and eventually the sheer weight of it will crush the Darwinist canard as surely as the Noahic Flood destroyed the world that existed before it and remade the face of the Earth forever. Someday men will laugh at the old textbooks that assert evolution and deep age and wonder at how gullible people had been.
So that you can be among those who know the truth ahead of the general population, so that you can know that there is meaning to life and you can find it for yourself in the God of the Bible through Jesus Christ the Savior, I continue to present evidence that defeats Darwinism. For instance, the more we learn about the Solar System, the more we see that it is young! Darwinists can only gape and declare that what we observe is lucky or a fluke. Yet all of the Solar System exhibits properties that negate the Darwinist hypotheses of the formation of planets and moons and stars.
Just one article about the massive problems the actual evidence the Sun and the Solar System present for Darwinism. I recommend Spike Psarris and his website as a good place to get inexpensive videos that go into depth on this subject. The Privileged Planet is a terrific resource as well. If you want to know the truth about what space missions and decades of astronomy have uncovered about the Solar System and beyond, those two resources alone will get you caught up quickly!
If you prefer to get things on the internet, here is a link to:
15 Evidences for the Age of the Universe
This, below is the appearance of the page. In order to actually click on the pictures to get the information, you must actually go to the site!