Saturday, November 07, 2009

Good guys and bad guys in the House, the list

Cartoon from Chekminus


CORRECTED POST WITH CORRECT VOTE (initially we were given the results of 886)

Just to be clear, the NOES are the good guys and the AYES are the ones who bowed to the Red Queen Pelosi rather than stand up for the Constitution and the voice of the people.

Nancy Pelosi actually had the audacity to sign and pass out copies of the massive bill that she did not read after the fact. Amazing!

Final Vote Results for Roll Call 886

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 887
(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

H R 3962 RECORDED VOTE 7-Nov-2009 11:16 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: Affordable Health Care for America Act

Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 219 39
Republican 1 176
Independent
TOTALS 220 215


---- AYES 220 ---

Abercrombie
Ackerman
Andrews
Arcuri
Baca
Baldwin
Bean
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Berry
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Cao
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Dahlkemper
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Driehaus
Edwards (MD)
Ellison
Ellsworth
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Foster
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Giffords
Gonzalez
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Halvorson
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Hill
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hodes
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kagen
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kilroy
Kind
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Klein (FL)
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Luján
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney
Markey (MA)
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy, Patrick
Murtha
Nadler (NY)
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perriello
Peters
Pingree (ME)
Polis (CO)
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Rodriguez
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schauer
Schiff
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sestak
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Space
Speier
Spratt
Stark
Stupak
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wexler
Wilson (OH)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth

---- NOES 215 ---

Aderholt
Adler (NJ)
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Baird
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boccieri
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boucher
Boustany
Boyd
Brady (TX)
Bright
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Castle
Chaffetz
Chandler
Childers
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (AL)
Davis (KY)
Davis (TN)
Deal (GA)
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dreier
Duncan
Edwards (TX)
Ehlers
Emerson
Fallin
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gordon (TN)
Granger
Graves
Griffith
Guthrie
Hall (TX)
Harper
Hastings (WA)
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth Sandlin
Hoekstra
Holden
Hunter
Inglis
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kissell
Kline (MN)
Kosmas
Kratovil
Kucinich
Lamborn
Lance
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee (NY)
Lewis (CA)
Linder
LoBiondo
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Markey (CO)
Marshall
Massa
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McMahon
McMorris Rodgers
Melancon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Minnick
Moran (KS)
Murphy (NY)
Murphy, Tim
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Nye
Olson
Paul
Paulsen
Pence
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Posey
Price (GA)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rehberg
Reichert
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Souder
Stearns
Sullivan
Tanner
Taylor
Teague
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Walden
Wamp
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)


How much longer will America BE America? I grieve for my country but I am also a veteran so doggone if I am not going to fight for it as well. This is not over...
2010 is coming. Find your Congressman in this crowd and vote accordingly!

As One Angry Man points out graphically, ignorance has been Obama's primary weapon up to this point:

Ah yes, that is the same question they began asking in the Soviet Union a generation ago. Too many young people do not remember the Wall and the Iron Curtain or the lessons of Communism. The Obama Administration is promising a chicken in every pot but, unless they are magic, someone is paying for both the chicken and the pot. Right?

Rob's Right!

Heroes and Villains and America at war


A song by the Beach Boys? Yep. A snapshot of America? Yep. We are at war against Islamofascists and also against anti-American socialists who wish to remake the nation. I don't want to see a reinstitution of the Soviet Union nor do I intend to live by Sharia Law!!!

Hero - the guy who posted the Shrimp Taco sign, Bob McCarthy, on the internet.

"After President Barack Obama won the Nobel Prize for Peace for less than two weeks of work in the Oval Office, the once-prestigious award has become as easy to get as an order of shrimp tacos." Who was the guy who put it up in real life?

Villain - The Red Queen, Nancy Pelosi, who will take off your head if you defy her quest to install Obamacare.

"It has come to this, America. Democrats have decided that if you don’t agree with their policies, you are to be fined. And if you don’t pay the fine, you are a criminal and will be sentenced to jail. That’s right, Democrats are criminalizing dissent."

Also

"In reply the JCT outlines the exact language in the bill that proves that Pelosi and her Democrat leaders want to turn YOU into a federal criminal if you don’t wantto buy her health insurance. Criminal penalties include:

  • Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.
  • Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.”

Is it Constitutional? Apparently they just don’t care."

Heck, Harry Reid doesn't even know what the 16th amendment to the Constitution says. He thinks paying taxes is "voluntary!" Democrats apparently neither know nor care what the Constitution says.

Hero -
Senator Lugar with honorary degree recipients at the 2009 Ball State Commencement. He is the second one from the left.


Senator Richard Lugar
- Either the Senator or one of his aides sent a personal reply to an email sent to his office by us last week. I have signed up for his newsletter and have sent several emails to him, but this time it displayed a different return email address and included specific answers to my questions and concerns. Way to be a representative of your constituents rather than a fat-cat political hack, Senator!!! Thank you for agreement concerning the dangers of this gargantuan and stupid health care bill that no one can fully understand and few if any of the people in Washington have even read! Nancy Pelosi is trying to ram a nation-destroying healthcare bill that no one understands down our throats in a Saturday session in the House and hopefully the Representatives with common sense and honor will refuse to be strongarmed, but if they are I am counting on Dick Lugar to stand up for Americans and fight it to the bitter end.

Villain - Another Islamic terrorist but this one was in our own colors! The Islamofascist coward actually took yet another victim... In gunning down a pregnant young woman, he took her baby as well.

Angel has a rant about the idiots who pretend this was not a terrorist act.

Hero - Kim Munley, female police officer, the heroine of Fort Hood! Sgt. Munley is only 5'2" tall but...

"According to eye witnesses, the alleged shooter was in the process of trying to finish off an injured soldier when he was distracted by pistol fire from civilian police Sergeant, Kimberly Munley. He turned his fire on her hitting her at least three times in the legs and wrist. But Munley disabled him with a shot to his torso ending the rampage."

Courage comes in both testosterone and estrogen varieties! As one Kim to another, way to go!

Speaking of which, Pamela Gellar of Atlas Shrugs is promoting a rally for Rifqa Bary. Hopefully you are well aware that the young teenaged girl is being held a virtual prisoner and that her parents are quite likely to kill her for leaving Islam behind?

Villain - CAIR and anyone who takes money from them or supports them. They downplay murderous attacks by an Islamic traitor and spend large sums of money in the attempt to take a young girl and subject her to religious reprisals and possibly death. Angel posted this (as linked earlier) -

Notable bad actors on this include Charlie Rangel, John Dingell, "Mr. SOX" Paul Sarbannes and Dennis "the senator from the moon" Kucinich.

Hero - You can go to Michelle Malkin or Amy Proctor, found on my blogroll, and get up-to-date information about events in Washington and the military, respectively.

Michelle has revealed how the Democrats are seeking to put an end to Democracy. The opening of her post is below:

Democrats and the death of deliberative democracy

By Michelle Malkin • November 6, 2009 05:56 AM

Update: Liveblogging of today’s House debate is here.

The House vote on Speaker Pelosi’s government health care bill is set for Saturday morning. She is scrambling to buy off recalcitrant Democrats on two of very issues that Rep. Joe Wilson and other House Republicans called out the White House for: abortion and illegal immigrant coverage. The wheeling and dealing is taking place behind closed doors. Once again, the Democrats who promised transparency are breaking their own promise to publish the final bill publicly 72 hours before the vote.

~

Amy Proctor with more about the criminal and shameless Democratic Party


Barney Frank Present With Gay Partner When Arrested for Pot Possession in 2007

It just doesn’t stop. On Democrat Congressman Barney Frank:

Rep. Barney Frank admitted Friday that he was sitting on the porch of his partner’s Maine home when police came to arrest his partner for marijuana possession.

Frank, responding to new reports that he was present during the Aug. 2007 arrest of James Ready, said in a statement he was unaware Ready had marijuana plants.

According to a police report obtained by MyFoxBoston, Maine police arrested and charged James Ready with marijuana possession, cultivation and use of drug paraphernalia. He pleaded guilty to civil possession and paid a fine. The remaining charges were dismissed last year.

Frank was not charged.

Frank is the author of a medical marijuana bill that would outlaw the prosecution of persons who use marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Is the Democratic leadership is a comedy of errors or a house of horrors?

Let’s not forget the time Barney Frank had an affair with a male prostitute, whom he paid to have sex with, and that subsequently the lover ran a prostitution ring out of Frank’s apartment.

~

Funny, most of the heroes are actually heroines!

This morning my wife and I went to a Tea Party meeting and discussed options concerning taking back our country from special interests and career, corrupt politicians. While those very politicians try to pretend the Tea Party movement is funded by special interests, it is in fact just bunches of citizens getting together to protest big government fraud and waste and make an attempt to have our representatives actually represent us. In the last year many millions of us have gathered at courthouses and town meetings and even about 1.8 million at one time in Washington, DC. We are not necessarily representing one party but we are representing one ideal. That ideal is that of a representative government ruled by our Constitution. Call us 912'ers or Patriots or Tea Party People or Tea-Baggers, we are not going away!

We watched a preview of Tea Party - The Movie and enjoyed a fine guest speaker in Jeffrey Cole of Grassfire/Resistnet and had a vigorous discussion afterwards. The presentation was held in a church building and we began with a pledge of allegiance and the singing of the Star-Spangled Banner. As I looked at the huge cross at the front of the church and then around me at the mix of young and old in attendance I found myself feeling hopeful. I do believe that the people can make a difference. Who would have thought America could have broken free from England in the first place? America is easier to reclaim than it was to begin but both efforts need a majority of people to give a rip about freedom! Do you?

While Michelle Bachmann called for a meeting in DC on December 5th at short notice (see this video) and around 45,000 people showed up, others showed up at town meetings all over the nation. My wife attended one in Munster, Indiana with Rep. Pete Visclosky and many others attended on in Hammond on the same day with Senator Evan Bayh. The most intelligent response Senator Bayh came up with was that "we have doctors who have cut off the wrong foot." Oh, so adding billions of dollars, long waiting periods, stacks of additional forms and untold numbers of bureaucrats will make sure an intern doesn't tag the wrong toe? Destroying the economy and who knows what else with a bill no one really understands and no one is willing to explain fixes that how?

Personal witness from someone in Washington on the 5th was that there were twelve arrests (none during the big event earlier) but the first came when Nancy Pelosi began yelling at a Patriot and the Patriot dared to yell back and Pelosi demanded that the person be arrested. The Red Queen must truly believe she is royalty.

So how can you be a hero?

1) Contact your Representative in Congress and your Senators via phone, email and or mail and let them know what you think about Obamacare, Cap and Trade and other issues of fundamental importance. Let them know you are monitoring their voting record...and then do it!

2) Join with other Patriots. Facebook has a Tea Party Patriots page, for instance. If you google for Tea Party or 912 organizations you will find others in your area who actually care enough about the country to work and vote for actual change rather than the fake stuff Obama was peddling.

3) Make sure you are registered to vote and vote! Sometimes the primaries are the most important elections locally so pay attention to candidates and seek to support those who represent your values.

Next Saturday we are going to a big rally in Warsaw, Indiana. We will be gathering in Warsaw, Indiana on November 14th as taxpayers and citizens. My wife and I are members of the Northwest Indiana Patriots (NWIP) and no one is funding us. We are just a big crowd of voters. No Astroturf in the bunch. We'll pay our own way there and back for the sake of our country and not because some fatcat is paying us. We don't have a George Soros!

By the way, the Republican Party called me this afternoon and asked for a donation and I declined. Once I contributed money to help elect George Bush over both John "F" Kerry and Al "Lear Jet" Gore. But not any longer. When the Republican Party abandons conservative principles they abandon me. When they spend $900,000 to elect a poseur RINO like Dede Scozzafava, selected in private, rather than the conservative Doug Hoffman then I refuse to give them a penny.

2010 is coming and I am voting for the best candidates regardless of party affiliation. 2010 is coming and the general public is getting angry at Washington and in the mood to toss out incumbents and try new people. 2010 is coming and every single politician who votes for Obamacare should be booted out of office!

Faith Jones of NWIP pointed out some features of this disastrous piece of legislation:

Pg 335: SEC. 1162. QUALITY BONUS PAYMENTS Lines 16-25 Pg 336-339 -Government mandates establishment of outcome based measures. HC the way they want. Rationing


Pg 341: SEC. 1162. QUALITY BONUS PAYMENTS Lines 3-9 Government has authority to disqualify Medicare Advantage Plans, HMOs, etc. Forcing people into Government plan.


Pg 354: SEC. 1177. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SPECIAL NEEDS PLANS TO RESTRICT ENROLLMENT - Government will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people! OMG! My sister has Downs Syndrome!!!


Pg 379: SEC. 1191. TELEHEALTH EXPANSION AND ENHANCEMENTS Government creates more bureaucracy - Telehealth Advisory Committee Can you say HC by phone?


PG 425: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 4-12 Government mandates Advance Care Planning Consult. Think Senior Citizens end of life


Pg 425: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 17-19 Government will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney Mandatory!


PG 425: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Government provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in death!


PG 427: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 15-24 Government mandates program for orders for end of life. The Government has a say in how your life ends!


Pg 429: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 1-9 An "advance care planning consultant" will be used frequently as patients health deteriorates.


PG 429: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 10-12 "advance care consultation" may include an ORDER 4 end of life plans. AN ORDER from GOV


Pg 429: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 13-25 – The Government will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.


PG 430: SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION Lines 11-15 The Government will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life.

Pg 469: SEC. 1302. MEDICAL HOME PILOT PROGRAM Community Based Home Medical Services=Non profit organizations. Hello, ACORN Medical Services here!!?


Page 472: SEC. 1302. MEDICAL HOME PILOT PROGRAM Lines 14-17 PAYMENT TO COMMUNITY-BASED ORG. 1 monthly payment 2 a community-based org. Like ACORN?


PG 489: SEC. 1308. COVERAGE OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST SERVICES AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELOR SERVICES The Government will cover Marriage and Family therapy. Which means they will insert Government into your marriage


Pg 494-498: SEC. 1308. COVERAGE OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST SERVICES AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELOR SERVICES Government will cover Mental Health Services including defining, creating, rationing those services.

In addition, the opinion of Michael Connelly - Retired attorney, Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House
Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied
it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional
law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were
being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse
than what I had heard or expected.


To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its
implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the
media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care,
particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are
involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion
services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members
of the medical profession.


The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out
of business and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions
about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal
bureaucrats and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of
necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled.


However, as scary as all of that it, it just scratches the surface.
In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention
of providing affordable health care choices.

Instead
it is a
convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the
Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been
contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions
of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been
destroyed.



The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of
power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the
U.S. Government.
The Congress will be transferring to the Obama
Administration authority in a number of different areas over the
lives of the American people and the businesses they own. The irony is
that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those
areas to begin with.

I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S.
Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of
Congress to regulate health care.


This legislation also provides for access by the appointees of the
Obama administration of all of your personal healthcare information,
your personal financial information, and the information of your
employer, physician, and hospital.

All of this is a direct violation
of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the
Constitution protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures.
You can also forget about the right to privacy.

That will have been
legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and
4th Amendments
may provide.


If you decide not to have healthcare insurance or if you have private
insurance that is not deemed "acceptable" to the "Health Choices
Administrator" appointed by Obama there will be a tax imposed on you.

It is called a "tax" instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid
application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.

However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law
that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is
definitely depriving someone of property without the "due process of
law.



So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate
so much out the original ten in the Bill of Rights that are
effectively nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though.

The
9th Amendment
that provides: "The enumeration in the
Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people;"

The 10th
Amendment
states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by
the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved
to the States respectively, or to the people." Under the provisions of
this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the
states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas
that once were theirs to control.


I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you
get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing
power and limiting rights.

Article 6
of the Constitution requires the
members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or
affirmation" to support the Constitution.


If I was a member of

Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything
like it without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or
affirmation. If I voted for it anyway I would hope the American
people would hold me accountable.


For those who might doubt the nature of this threat I suggest they

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat I suggest they

consult the source.



Here is a link to the Constitution:


_http://www.archives.g...



And another to the Bill of Rights:


_http://www.archives.g...


_http://www.archives.g...



There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.



Michael Connelly

Retired attorney,

Constitutional Law Instructor

Carrollton, Texas

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Obama Halloween


Hat tip. Gary McCoy, artist.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Pre-school books with class!!! Authored by my clever friend Patti

I have a friend who is a lovely and talented woman. She wound up being a single mom, raising her boys, and found work in the IT industry as a representative for one of the biggest software firms in the world. She went fairly high up on the corporate ladder.

She briefly considered dating a good buddy of mine and that did not work for them. Naturally I hope she finds her other half someday. Being married to the right person is awesome so I hope that my single friends find that for themselves. But we all make our own way in the world and Patti will marry someday if she wishes. We have found that she has a lot on her plate right now so we are rooting for her to have great success with her new business. But some lucky guy in Texas may someday find himself a heck of a wife someday? Okay, enough, now I sound like a matchmaker and I really don't care for Barbra Streisand!

My wife and I do like Patti a lot and so, when she decided to dump corporate America and become an entrepreneur we were surprised but we encouraged her. It turns out that Patti wanted to write books for small children. Our smallest grand-daughter is just a not-so-terrible two about to turn three so we figured we would buy the Patti books for her and if they were not so good, well, we helped a friend!

But Patti's books turn out to be absolutely awesome! She really helps children learn to read and think and associate words with animals and actions. We were thrilled with the books and Angie loves them!

Therefore I am presenting to the world a fine children's book author: Patti Toler!

Patti Toler

www.CreativeBks.com

Patti@CreativeBks.com


"Welcome to Creative Entourage

Welcome to Creative EntourageCreative Entourage Literacy Series of books are inspiring beginning readers to develop strong core reading competencies. The Literacy Series promotes early literacy, creativity, and assists with beginning reading and writing skills. The books provide an approach to learning specific skills, such as letter recognition, phonics, and sight words, which are fundamental to becoming competent, independent readers and writers.

Combining the book material with other disciplines such as math, science, and language arts creates an environment to learn in a holistic, comprehensive manner. The vision is to help parents, schools, libraries, and all educators meet the needs of beginning readers.

The Literacy Series promises to become an important component to a reading program. English as a second language learners and children with special needs can benefit and enjoy mastering beginning reading skills."

~

Yes, I like to help a friend but frankly, if you have a small child these books will help them learn and grow so this is actually a matter of being of service to you and them. I do believe Patti is gifted and she is brave to give up a high-salaried job to risk everything in doing what she has always longed to do. I am impressed and the minute she puts out a fourth book we will order it!

Friday, October 23, 2009

Evolution will not fly. First five reasons why




The Jurassic Shrimp wants you to know they didn't leave us 50 million years ago. Not even Richard Dawkins can tell you this is not the same kind of shrimp commonly found in fossil rocks.


Should I say he could not say it honestly? Good, that is better.




You think the rocks above were still kind of wet and freshly laid when they were twisted like taffy?
That would be the logical and obvious conclusion.


Ripple marks on sandstone at Cliff Springs, Arizona. All rock layers show signs of water formation at some point when carefully examined. Uniformitarianism has been debunked.




Part One: Our series from





FIFTY REASONS WHY

EVOLUTION WILL NOT FLY


(RMCF content in blue)

There is ample evidence to believe that a God created our universe, earth, plants, animals, and people just as described in the book of Genesis. Please read on and give each point careful thought as to which religious view sounds more reasonable -- special creation or evolution.





1. PARACONFORMITY: Evolutionary geologists contend that rocks were laid down in a uniform, predictable manner over billions of years. These scientists label and date these rock layers with familiar names such as Jurassic and Pre-Cambrian. The term Paraconformity describes those rock formations that are missing certain layers which are predicted by evolutionary geology. None of the typical gullying and weathering is visible in these examples, unlike what we see when the ground has been exposed for long periods. At several places in the Baltic region, clays of the so-called Pleistocene age rest directly on clays that contain Cambrian age fossils, creating an evolutionary gap of 400 million years. Yet in some places the break between layers can hardly be located, so similar are the two clays. Creationists say that the evidence from these anomalies indicates that the traditional, evolutionary dating methods for rocks are faulty. What do you say?

Radar - Notice the smooth layers of rocks in the Grand Canyon. The expected aging is not there, the layers are smooth and all show signs of water formation. Check out this picture of the Grand Canyon walls, below:



Radar - Dr. Sean Pitman has a great treatise on the subjects both above and below (see pic below).



2. GEOLOGY REVERSED: Around the world, we see rock layers out of normal evolutionary sequence. Naturalist geologists believe the earth’s rocks were laid down in a uniform manner over billions of years. In Glacier National Park, however, a block of Precambrian “old” rock sits on top of Cretaceous “newer” rock. Why is this important? Evolutionists have a hard time explaining this embarrassing example of 1 billion year-old rock sitting on top of 100 million year old rock. Perhaps the rocks have moved since they were laid down? Unfortunately, when geologists look for signs of movement such as scrape marks or tallis piles they find none. Additionally, the tensile strength of rock makes it highly unlikely that the older block of rock moved across the newer without shattering to dust. Looking at the evidence, creationists say that both rocks were created at the same time. What do you say?



Radar - Picture above of Hanging Lake area, Glenwood Canyon --- An unconformity occurs between the lower Ordovician Manitou Formation and the upper Devonian Chaffee Group. [The Manitou Fm extends left horizontally from the lone tree on the sloping skyline ridge in the middle of the picture. The formation is about twice as thick as the tree is high. The Chaffee Group is about the same thickness and is the next higher layer with many tree growing along the top of it on the skyline.] The "25 million year-long Silurian period" is missing between them, although no evidence is found here for major erosion in the lower layer. Missing layers, cross-bedding, switched layers, all of these are common throughout the world. The standard geological column presented to students is a fraud.



3. RADIOMETRIC DATING: This process attempts to place an accurate date on the age of rocks by measuring the decay of radioactive minerals trapped within. Scientists first examine the relative ratios of various minerals in the host rock. Three basic assumptions are made when dating a piece of rock;



A. the rock contained no ” radioactive “daughter-product” atoms in the beginning, only parent atoms.

B. since the moment of its creation no parent or daughter atoms were either added to or taken from the sample rock.

C. the rate of decay has always remained constant (uniform decay).


These assumptions cannot be proven with any degree of accuracy. To make a scientific claim, one must be able to reproduce results. What do you think? In your experience, can an algebraic equation with three unknown variables yield a predictable, verifiable result?

Radar - So I mentioned that the RATE conferences have found ways to actually date rocks. Too bad the results come back at about 6,000 years or so.

4. OIL AND COAL ARE YOUNG: When the carbon-14 test was first created, scientists used the process to date all sorts of things. Two examples included oil and coal. Tests of these two substances by the carbon-14 dating method reveal them to be only several thousand years old instead of millions of years old, as predicted by evolutionary theory. Once this method was shown to predict recent dates for oil and coal, scientists stopped dating these products using this method. Do you think it is intellectually sound to reject a process that fails to yield the results you so badly wanted? Is this good science?



Radar - Oil has to have been trapped underground less than 100,000 years. Check out the picture below (There is no "impermeable" cap rock. Oil and gas are escaping from their lairs and their pressure is decreasing.













5. PERMANENCE OF KINDS: Also called stasis, this field of observation has determined that most animals have remained relatively unchanged throughout the fossil record. Despite millions of (supposed) years and billions of chances to evolve into higher life forms, no evidence exists for this theory. Many fossils from “older” rocks, when compared to their modern counterparts, are often identical in form. Worms still look like worms, not some hybrid creatures. Not one change of one life form into another has ever been recorded, yet evolution is regarded in most circles as fact.








Radar - Living fossils, we find more of them each decade. So many animals have remained basically or perhaps entirely unchanged. Not good for evolution.

The Purple Frog lives underground so escaped discovery until recently. Pretty much the same thing found in fossils.






The Mantis Shrimp, once thought extinct, was supposed to develop 400 million years ago? They have perhaps the most advanced eyes in the biosphere.




Then there is the good old Colecanth, rediscovered in the 1930's. We now know they live off the coast of Africa and also SE Asia.








A Frill Shark, one living fossil that looks like a remarkably impressive monster and now we know it is most definitely NOT extinct. In fact actual Tyrannosaurus tissue from a Western United States dig kills evolution dead. Organic tissue could not conceivably last millions of years!





The above soft tissue from the famous T-Rex found by Mary Sweitzer.


The 2005 discovery of "fresh" tissue in the femur of a fossilized T. rex in Montana was quite a surprise (except to informed creationists), reported for example March 25, 2005, by Reuter News Service, "Scientists recover T. rex soft tissue: 70-million-year-old fossil yields preserved blood vessels". National Geographic News reported also in an article March 24, 2005, in which lead researcher Mary Schweitzer was quoted as saying, "Finding these tissues in dinosaurs changes the way we think about fossilization, because our theories of how fossils are preserved don't allow for this [soft-tissue preservation]."




Full disclosure...I am not a staffer for the Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship but I am a member in good standing.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

If the Constitution falls in the White House, does it make a sound?


Thanks, 4-Block World!!! Hey, was the idea of Barack on Letterman an inspiration in any way? I wonder if he brought Liva Snaps...or interns? (Ba-DUMP)

Woman Honor Thyself - Angel presents a must-see video. I mean you gotta see this!!! Our freedom of speech and our flat-out freedoms of all kind are under siege. Watch it and tell me what you think.

Yet another Obama Czar (manufacturing) quoting Mao? Bloom says, among other things, “We kind of agree with Mao that power comes largely from the barrel of a gun.” Ron Bloom as presented by Gateway Pundit.



What are you going to do if they take away your internet access and control the news media? What happens then? Who has a bigger gun than the President of the United States? Anyway, you will not be shocked to learn that Bloom came to the White House by way of the SEIU, right?

Did you know that It’s come to this: White House tries to bar Fox News from interviewing pay czar? This is after the White House tried to get the rest of the journalism world to take the Fox ball away and go home? The Obama Administration has no shame.



Does anybody wonder why they call them "czars?" Can we change that to Corruption Chiefs?
Way back in July Michelle Malkin exposed the czars for what they really are...then she goes on to point out a large part of the problem with this culture of corruption:

"A panel of constitutional scholars told the Senate that lawmakers can’t really do anything about Team Obama’s massive proliferation of unaccountable appointees with unlimited authority — until they get caught exceeding their assigned powers.

Which, of course, we know so little about because the White House has kept so many czar budgets and staffing out of public view."



It falls to the general public and bloggers and Fox News to keep an eye on this situation, because networks like MSNBC are in the tank for Obama. Chris Mathews, is that leg still tinglin'? For crying out loud, Dan Rather was willing to present made up evidence against George Bush but NBC and CBS and ABC and CNN just watch as this administration tries to stifle free speech and ignore the obvious crimes of ACORN unless they are intentionally lying about them!


One of Michelle's posts starred these revelations from a government employee still able to think:

A peek at a federal employee’s spam e-mail from Team Obama

By Michelle Malkin • October 8, 2009 10:44 PM

Here’s the e-mail of the day, from a beleaguered federal employee at the Commerce Department.

Thanks to the e-mailer for giving us a revealing glimpse into the bowels of the spam-happy, appointee-overrun Obama bureaucracy.

Michelle,

I work for the Department of Commerce as a federal employee…and am getting rather fed up with what I have seen since last January…

Over the past couple of weeks, we have received several emails (a couple below, two received within a minute of each other) from the Commerce Secretary, Gary Locke, announcing ANOTHER new White House web site. This web site is where employees can make suggestions for how government can save money……ooooh, and win a trip to see Obama!!

What a joke after all we have seen since Obama was elected! Too bad the general public cannot submit suggestions.

I wonder how many needed items will be cut in favor of more leftist programs?

Somehow I highly doubt the following suggestions would be acceptable to them:

1. Get rid of the numerous and redundant czars.
2. Stop bailing out institutions that should probably fail like banks, car companies, unions, etc., particularly the politically connected.
3. Make Charlie Rangel pay his taxes.
4. Stop funding corrupt organizations immediately like ACORN.
5. Stop flying Air Force One (and the massive entourage) all over the world for personal reasons.
6. Stop flying in sycophantic supporters to promote your socialized health plan.

I could go on and on.

Today, another email was sent out announcing the creation of two new political appointee positions within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Just what we need. More layers of flunkies at the top taking up space.

How about saving money by not creating these positions for political cronies?

The emails follow:




ADDENDUM DE DUM DUM

The Differences Between Liberals and Conservatives

Going around Ye Olde Interwebs. I found it at Grouchy Olde Cripple:

If a conservative doesn’t like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy.
A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as independently successful.
Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don’t like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it’s a foreign religion, of course!)

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is embarrassed.
If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and then sues.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Americans for Prosperity is warning us that Censorship is coming

As important as all the fights are that we're in right now, perhaps the biggest of all is the fight over whether the government will take over the Internet. That's because as long as the Internet is free, we can use it to communicate, educate, and organize. Tea parties, townhalls, and AFP events would be very difficult to organize if government owned and controlled the Internet and chose to interfere with it. That's what's at stake this week as the Federal Communications Commission decides on Thursday whether to move forward with so-called "net neutrality" regulations.

The net neutrality movement is an outgrowth of the larger so-called media reform project of radical left-wing activists like Robert McChesney who seek to destroy private control of the country's communications systems.

I discussed McChesney and the so-called media reform movement last night on the Glenn Beck show, and you can watch that clip here. I'll be on with Glenn again tonight to discuss net neutrality specifically.

As the Internet Freedom Coalition shows on our Net Neutrality Scare Ticket it has now been nearly 7 years since the November 19, 2002 letter that started the net neutrality scare, without a single significant incident of the kind of egregious behavior by evil phone and cable companies we're told require government intervention. It's a solution in search of a problem.

Net neutrality sounds simple--force phone and cable companies to treat every bit of information the same way--until you realize that modern networks are incredibly complex, with millions of lines of code in every router. Making sure services like VoIP, video conferencing, and telemedicine (not to mention the next great thing that hasn't been invented yet) get priority may be necessary to make the Internet work. But the government is working to do just the opposite.

These networks cost billions of dollars to build and maintain, and if there is uncertainty whether there will be a good return on that investment, private investment will dry up. And then government will step in, spending billions of our tax dollars on a government-owned and controlled Internet.

That's their plan.

The push for a Washington takeover of the Internet is coming from the White House. It includes Susan Crawford, the so-called Internet Czar, who told The Wall Street Journal in April that the $7.2 billion of stimulus money for broadband she is helping spend is a "down payment on future government investments in the Internet." She went on to say: "We should do a better job as a nation of making sure fast, affordable broadband is as ubiquitous as electricity, water, snail mail or any other public utility."

It comes right from the top. President Obama himself said on the campaign trail: "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality."

The FCC will vote Thursday on what it calls a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Net Neutrality. If it passes, it will start a public comment period and I'll be emailing you again with instructions on how to file comments. But for the next couple days, we need to make our case against the FCC even taking that first step down the road to a Washington takeover of the Internet.

Here's what you can do to help: The FCC created a website at www.OpenInternet.gov where you can comment on government regulating the Internet under so-called net neutrality rules. The left has been flooding it with comments. Please take a moment to head over to www.OpenInternet.gov and click on "Join the Discussion" to make your voice heard for keeping the Internet in private hands.

Thanks for all you do.

Phil Kerpen

Director of Policy, Americans for Prosperity
Chairman, The Internet Freedom Coalition

P.S. Wanted to remind you again that you can see me tonight on the Glenn Beck program on FOX News at 5PM and 2AM Eastern, 2PM and 11PM Pacific. You can also contact me any time through Twitter (http://twitter.com/kerpen) or Facebook (http://facebook.com/PhilKerpen).

RADAR SEZ - It will cost you nothing to go to that link and express your opinion. If you love freedom of speech, please post a comment urging that the FCC keep hands off. No censoring our internet. No censorship!!!!

I do not censor comments. Most of my commenters disagree with me. Freedom of speech is a foundation of our nation. The Obama Administration hates freedom of speech. Wake up and fight for your rights before they are gone, please!

~~~

Fiorina: Government has to regulate “wild west” Internet

Stop The ACLU is onto the ACORN scandal...more to come!

http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/21/the-medias-complicity-analysis-of-acorn-coverage/

TARP Report – “We don’t even know where the money went”

Amy Proctor points out that 49 out of 50 states (plus DC) have fewer jobs seven months after the stimulus bill!


Tuesday, October 20, 2009

World Net reveals that Obama Administration boasts of controlling the news media!!!!!



I have to just post this in it's entirety, it is too alarming to simply link. Anita Dunn may admire Mao but the White House surely is following in the footsteps of Stalin and Hitler. Will a time come when people with guns and badges come to my door at three AM to drag me away? The Obama Administration wants control over the news media, which is why they are at war with Fox News. If we lose freedom of speech then our other freedoms will follow and we will become like Russia was, a great mass of poor people and a few rich Ruling Party folks living off of the rest of us.

Communism/Socialism always fails. Red China is a disaster for most of their citizens. Hitler's Nazi Party was socialist. Barack Obama has proven by his words, actions and "czars" that he is a dedicated socialist bent on radically changing the United States. America, you were really stupid to elect him but you can still tell your congressmen to vote against his agendas or you will vote them out of office! Say no to National Health Care. Say no to Cap and Trade. Say no to UnFairness Doctrines. Say no to socialism or kiss your freedom goodbye.





WND Exclusive
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
White House boasts: We 'control' news media
Communications chief offers shocking confession to foreign government


Posted: October 18, 2009
7:11 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Anita Dunn

TEL AVIV – President Obama's presidential campaign focused on "making" the news media cover certain issues while rarely communicating anything to the press unless it was "controlled," White House Communications Director Anita Dunn disclosed to the Dominican government at a videotaped conference.

"Very rarely did we communicate

through the press anything that we didn't absolutely control," said Dunn.

"One of the reasons we did so many of the David Plouffe videos was not just for our supporters, but also because it was a way for us to get our message out without having to actually talk to reporters," said Dunn, referring to Plouffe, who was Obama's chief campaign manager.

"We just put that out there and made them write what Plouffe had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it," Dunn said.

Check out the hot new best-seller -- "Muslim Mafia"

Continued Dunn: "Whether it was a David Plouffe video or an Obama speech, a huge part of our press strategy was focused on making the media cover what Obama was actually saying as opposed to why the campaign was saying it, what the tactic was. … Making the press cover what we were saying."

Video of Dunn's remarks at the conference can be seen below:





Dunn was speaking at a Jan. 12, 2009, event focusing on Obama's media tactics and hosted by the Global Foundation for Democracy and Development, which seeks to promote collaboration between the U.S. and the Dominican Republic. The event was held in Santo Domingo and was attended by the country's president.

Dunn has been facing some criticism since she led a White House campaign last week against Fox News, slamming the top-rated network as an "arm of the Republican Party" and "opinion journalism masquerading as news."

Fox hit back this past Friday, releasing a video of Dunn speaking to high school students last June in which she lists her two "favorite political philosophers," including Communist Chinese leader Mao Tse-tung, whose draconian policies are blamed for the deaths of tens of millions of people.

Video of Dunn's speech, broadcast during a segment of Glenn Beck's evening show on the Fox News Channel, can be seen below:

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott

Note: News media wishing to interview Aaron Klein, please contact WND.

Bookmark and Share



Meanwhile,




White House Urges Other Networks to Disregard Fox News


The White House is calling on other news organizations to isolate and alienate Fox News as it sends out top advisers to rail against the cable channel as a Republican Party mouthpiece.

Top political strategists question the decision by the Obama administration to escalate its offensive against Fox News. And as of Monday, the four other major television networks had not given any indication that they intend to sever their ties with Fox News.

But several top White House officials have taken aim at Fox News since communications director Anita Dunn branded Fox "opinion journalism masquerading as news" in an interview last Sunday.

White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel told CNN on Sunday that President Obama does not want "the CNNs and the others in the world [to] basically be led in following Fox."

Obama senior adviser David Axelrod went further by calling on media outlets to join the administration in declaring that Fox is "not a news organization."

"Other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way," Axelrod counseled ABC's George Stephanopoulos. "We're not going to treat them that way."

Asked Monday about another Axelrod claim that Fox News is just trying to make money, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that while all media companies fall under that description, "I would say sometimes programming can be tilted toward accentuating those profits."

But by urging other news outlets to side with the administration, Obama officials dramatically upped the ante in the war of words that began earlier this month with Dunn's comments.

So far, none of the four other major networks has given any indication that they wish to disinvite Fox News from the White House pool -- the rotation through which the networks share the costs and duties of White House coverage and the most significant interaction among the news channels.

The White House stopped providing guests to "Fox News Sunday" after host Chris Wallace fact-checked controversial assertions made by Tammy Duckworth, assistant secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, in August.

Dunn said fact-checking an administration official was "something I've never seen a Sunday show do."

"She criticized 'Fox News Sunday' last week for fact-checking -- fact-checking -- an administration official," Wallace said Sunday. "They didn't say that our fact-checking was wrong. They just said that we had dared to fact-check."

"Let's fact-check Anita Dunn, because last Sunday she said that Fox ignores Republican scandals, and she specifically mentioned the scandal involving Nevada senator John Ensign," Wallace added. "A number of Fox News shows have run stories about Senator Ensign. Anita Dunn's facts were just plain wrong."

Fox News senior vice president Michael Clemente said: "Surprisingly, the White House continues to declare war on a news organization instead of focusing on the critical issues that Americans are concerned about like jobs, health care and two wars. The door remains open and we welcome a discussion about the facts behind the issues."

Observers on both sides of the political aisle questioned the White House's decision to continue waging war on a news organization, saying the move carried significant political risks.

Democratic strategist Donna Brazile said on CNN: "I don't always agree with the White House. And on this one here I would disagree."

David Gergen, who has worked for Democratic and Republican presidents, said: "I totally agree with Donna Brazile." Gergen added that White House officials have "gotten themselves into a fight they don't necessarily want to be in. I don't think it's in their best interest."

"The faster they can get this behind them, the more they can treat Fox like one other organization, the easier they can get back to governing, and then put some people out on Fox," Gergen said on CNN. "I mean, for goodness sakes, you know, you engage in the debate.

"What Americans want is a robust competition of ideas, and they ought to be willing to go out there and mix it up with some strong conservatives on Fox, just as there are strong conservatives on CNN like Bill Bennett."

Bennett expressed outrage that Dunn told an audience of high school students this year that Mao Zedong, the founder of communist China, was one of "my favorite political philosophers."

"Having the spokesman do this, attack Fox, who says that Mao Zedong is one of the most influential figures in her life, was not...a small thing; it's a big thing," Bennett said on CNN. "When she stands up, in a speech to high school kids, says she's deeply influenced by Mao Zedong, that -- I mean, that is crazy."

Fox News contributor Karl Rove, who was the top political strategist to former President George W. Bush, said: "This is an administration that's getting very arrogant and slippery in its dealings with people. And if you dare to oppose them, they're going to come hard at you and they're going to cut your legs off."

"This is a White House engaging in its own version of the media enemies list. And it's unhelpful for the country and undignified for the president of the United States to so do," Rove added. "That is over- the-top language. We heard that before from Richard Nixon."

Media columnist David Carr of The New York Times warned that the White House war on Fox "may present a genuine problem for Mr. Obama, who took great pains during the campaign to depict himself as being above the fray of over-heated partisan squabbling."

"While there is undoubtedly a visceral thrill in finally setting out after your antagonists, the history of administrations that have successfully taken on the media and won is shorter than this sentence," Carr wrote over the weekend. "So far, the only winner in this latest dispute seems to be Fox News. Ratings are up 20 percent this year."

He added: "The administration, by deploying official resources against a troublesome media organization, seems to have brought a knife to a gunfight."

~

Note - Fox News is the number one cable news network among viewers 25-54 for seven years in a row and counting and their viewership is growing faster than the also-rans. If Obama has a problem with Fox, it means he has a problem with Americans!

Does the Obama Administration make the Nixon guys look like statesmen, or is it just me? Talk about an enemies list! Yet this strategy is so stupid you have to wonder if anyone in the White House can actually THINK?

Yes, I am feeling better these days. Have a lot of thoughts to get off my chest after 14 months of illness...