Reading all the way through the Old Testament in approximate chronological order By your friendly neighborhood bloggerman, radar. Do it with me? | ||
Day | Today's Scripture Reading | |
Day 1 | ||
Day 2 | ||
Day 3 | ||
Day 4 | ||
Day 5 | ||
Day 6 | ||
Day 7 | ||
Day 8 | ||
Day 9 | ||
Day 10 | ||
Day 11 | ||
Day 12 | ||
Day 13 | ||
Day 14 | ||
Day 15 | ||
Day 16 | ||
Day 17 | ||
Day 18 | ||
Day 19 | ||
Day 20 | ||
Day 21 | ||
Day 22 | ||
Day 23 | ||
Day 24 | ||
Day 25 | ||
Day 26 | ||
Day 27 | ||
Day 28 | ||
Day 29 | ||
Day 30 | ||
Day 31 | ||
Day 32 | ||
Day 33 | ||
Day 34 | ||
Day 35 | ||
Day 36 | ||
Day 37 | ||
Day 38 | ||
Day 39 | ||
Day 40 | ||
Day 41 | ||
Day 42 | ||
Day 43 | ||
Day 44 | ||
Day 45 | ||
Day 46 | ||
Day 47 | ||
Day 48 | ||
Day 49 | ||
Day 50 | ||
Day 51 | ||
Day 52 | ||
Day 53 | ||
Day 54 | ||
Day 55 | ||
Day 56 | ||
Day 57 | ||
Day 58 | ||
Day 59 | ||
Day 60 | ||
Day 61 | ||
Day 62 | ||
Day 63 | ||
Day 64 | ||
Day 65 | ||
Day 66 | ||
Day 67 | ||
Day 68 | ||
Day 69 | ||
Day 70 | ||
Day 71 | ||
Day 72 | ||
Day 73 | ||
Day 74 | ||
Day 75 | ||
Day 76 | ||
Day 77 | ||
Day 78 | ||
Day 79 | ||
Day 80 | ||
Day 81 | ||
Day 82 | ||
Day 83 | ||
Day 84 | ||
Day 85 | ||
Day 86 | ||
Day 87 | ||
Day 88 | ||
Day 89 | ||
Day 90 | ||
Day 91 | ||
Day 92 | ||
Day 93 | ||
Day 94 | ||
Day 95 | ||
Day 96 | ||
Day 97 | ||
Day 98 | ||
Day 99 | ||
Day 100 | ||
Day 101 | ||
Day 102 | ||
Day 103 | ||
Day 104 | ||
Day 105 | ||
Day 106 | ||
Day 107 | ||
Day 108 | ||
Day 109 | ||
Day 110 | ||
Day 111 | ||
Day 112 | ||
Day 113 | ||
Day 114 | ||
Day 115 | ||
Day 116 | ||
Day 117 | ||
Day 118 | ||
Day 119 | ||
Day 120 | ||
Day 121 | ||
Day 122 | ||
Day 123 | ||
Day 124 | ||
Day 125 | ||
Day 126 | ||
Day 127 | ||
Day 128 | ||
Day 129 | ||
Day 130 | ||
Day 131 | ||
Day 132 | ||
Day 133 | ||
Day 134 | ||
Day 135 | ||
Day 136 | ||
Day 137 | ||
Day 138 | ||
Day 139 | ||
Day 140 | ||
Day 141 | ||
Day 142 | ||
Day 143 | ||
Day 144 | ||
Day 145 | ||
Day 146 | ||
Day 147 | ||
Day 148 | ||
Day 149 | ||
Day 150 | ||
Day 151 | ||
Day 152 | ||
Day 153 | ||
Day 154 | ||
Day 155 | ||
Day 156 | ||
Day 157 | ||
Day 158 | ||
Day 159 | ||
Day 160 | ||
Day 161 | ||
Day 162 | ||
Day 163 | ||
Day 164 | ||
Day 165 | ||
Day 166 | ||
Day 167 | ||
Day 168 | ||
Day 169 | ||
Day 170 | ||
Day 171 | ||
Day 172 | ||
Day 173 | ||
Day 174 | ||
Day 175 | ||
Day 176 | ||
Day 177 | ||
Day 178 | ||
Day 179 | ||
Day 180 | ||
Day 181 | ||
Day 182 | ||
Day 183 | ||
Day 184 | ||
Day 185 | ||
Day 186 | ||
Day 187 | ||
Day 188 | ||
Day 189 | ||
Day 190 | ||
Day 191 | ||
Day 192 | ||
Day 193 | ||
Day 194 | ||
Day 195 | ||
Day 196 | ||
Day 197 | ||
Day 198 | ||
Day 199 | ||
Day 200 | ||
Day 201 | ||
Day 202 | ||
Day 203 | ||
Day 204 | ||
Day 205 | ||
Day 206 | ||
Day 207 | ||
Day 208 | ||
Day 209 | ||
Day 210 | ||
Day 211 | ||
Day 212 | ||
Day 213 | ||
Day 214 | ||
Day 215 | ||
Day 216 | ||
Day 217 | ||
Day 218 | ||
Day 219 | ||
Day 220 | ||
Day 221 | ||
Day 222 | ||
Day 223 | ||
Day 224 | ||
Day 225 | ||
Day 226 | ||
Day 227 | ||
Day 228 | ||
Day 229 | ||
Day 230 | ||
Day 231 | ||
Day 232 | ||
Day 233 | ||
Day 234 | ||
Day 235 | ||
Day 236 | ||
Day 237 | ||
Day 238 | ||
Day 239 | ||
Day 240 | ||
Day 241 | ||
Day 242 | ||
Day 243 | ||
Day 244 | ||
Day 245 | ||
Day 246 | ||
Day 247 | ||
Day 248 | ||
Day 249 | ||
Day 250 | ||
Day 251 | ||
Day 252 | ||
Day 253 | ||
Day 254 | ||
Day 255 | ||
Day 256 | ||
Day 257 | ||
Day 258 | ||
Day 259 | ||
Day 260 | ||
Day 261 | ||
Day 262 | ||
Day 263 | ||
Day 264 | ||
Day 265 | ||
Day 266 | ||
Day 267 | ||
Day 268 | ||
Day 269 | ||
Day 270 | ||
Day 271 | ||
Day 272 | ||
Day 273 | ||
Day 274 | ||
Day 275 | ||
Day 276 | ||
Day 277 | ||
Day 278 | ||
Day 279 | ||
Day 280 | ||
Day 281 | ||
Day 282 | ||
Day 283 | ||
Day 284 | ||
Day 285 | ||
Day 286 | ||
Day 287 | ||
Day 288 | ||
Day 289 | ||
Day 290 | ||
Day 291 | ||
Day 292 | ||
Day 293 | ||
Day 294 | ||
Day 295 | ||
Day 296 | ||
Day 297 | ||
Day 298 | ||
Day 299 | ||
Day 300 | ||
Day 301 | ||
Day 302 | ||
Day 303 | ||
Day 304 | ||
Day 305 | ||
Day 306 | ||
Day 307 | ||
Day 308 | ||
Day 309 | ||
Day 310 | ||
Day 311 | ||
Day 312 | ||
Day 313 | ||
Day 314 | ||
Day 315 | ||
Day 316 | ||
Day 317 | ||
Day 318 | ||
Day 319 | ||
Day 320 | ||
Day 321 | ||
Day 322 | ||
Day 323 | ||
Day 324 | ||
Day 325 | ||
Day 326 | ||
Day 327 | ||
Day 328 | ||
Day 329 | ||
Day 330 | ||
Day 331 | ||
Day 332 | ||
Day 333 | ||
Day 334 | ||
Day 335 | ||
Day 336 | ||
Day 337 | ||
Day 338 | ||
Day 339 | ||
Day 340 | ||
Day 341 | ||
Day 342 | ||
Day 343 | ||
Day 344 | ||
Day 345 | ||
Day 346 | ||
Day 347 | ||
Day 348 | ||
Day 349 | ||
Day 350 | ||
Day 351 | ||
Day 352 | ||
Day 353 | ||
Day 354 | ||
Day 355 | ||
Day 356 | ||
Day 357 | ||
Day 358 | ||
Day 359 | ||
Day 360 | ||
Day 361 | ||
Day 362 | ||
Day 363 | ||
Day 364 | ||
Day 365 | ||
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
282 days on and 83 days off - Reading the Old Testament through in a year
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
You Know What? Maybe I will, and Meanwhile, I Need your Help Over at my Blog. They've been Asking me Questions on My Mount Saint Helens Post.
I did go there, and I can help by making a couple of posts here later. The Grand Canyon is used by creationists to teach students about Flood geology and the effects of the Ice Age on the topography of the planet after the Flood. Ironically the Darwinists fail to see the evidence in that canyon that kills their concepts dead, not to mention other sites that are even worse for them.
A good question over at Lista's blog was this one, by a commenter called Satyavati devi dasi:
"The question I'm asking involves the many thousands of feet of strata at the Grand Canyon, which comprise various types of rock such as limestone (which precipitates in warm, shallow ocean conditions and in the case of the Grand Canyon contains marine fossils) and sandstones (also fossiliferous), and which is unconformably underlain by the Visnu Schist.
What I am curious about is what you would say the timeframe was for these thousands of feet of strata to be emplaced as rock, and to explain how a marine strata (and the carbonates that form limestone precipitate out of the water.. they don't evaporate) can be both underlain and overlain by sandstones (some of which are clearly desert, wind-bedded strata) in a short period of time, and how to account for geologic features such as the unconformity of the Visnu Schist at the base of the canyon. I'm interested to know what kind of timeframe would be required for all of this to occur."
Hate to break it to you, Lista, but Radar won't be able to answer this. Be prepared for some major evasions.
Actually I have already answered the false concept of wind-bedded strata. It has been proven to be a water deposit and not a wind deposit. Not that I expect you to keep up and read every post, but if you had read all I have posted about the Grand Canyon you know that the desert layering proposal was falsified and I presented documentation. Search feature?
Thanks Radar,
For coming by my blog. Satyavati is Asking all Kinds of Questions. They are Very Intelligent Questions and she Appears to Really Want to Know.
Anonymous,
I Gave an Answer Myself to her in Relation to the Limestone "(which precipitates in warm, shallow ocean conditions)". Actually, though, Satyavati's Words did not Include the Word "Shallow". She just said "Warm Oceanic Conditions."
One Possible Answer could have to do with Genesis 7:11, "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month -- on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened."
These Springs are Very Hot, like 450 Degrees. The Point I made was that if these Highly Heated "springs of the great deep burst forth", as the Bible Suggests, then the Warm Ocean Water Rose and Mixed with all the Water from "the floodgates of the heavens" and there was, therefore, the "Warm Oceanic Conditions" Necessary for the "Marine Limestone".
See Radar's Post, Is the Bible Scientifically Correct? Introducing, Please Convince Me Dot.com, that is the Section on "Are there Springs and Fountains in the Sea?" for a more Detailed Explanation of the Fountains and "Springs of the Great Deep.
"It has been proven to be a water deposit and not a wind deposit."
Link or retract.
One, I do not take orders from anonymous people. You can take your link and retract it yourself. I wouldn't just call you up and order you to cut your lawn. You have no authority.
We are all people with our own agendas. I would tell you to prove me wrong.
Two, before your pompous mandate was issued I already posted a long column dealing with schists and sedimentary rock layering. There is more to come. But I have posted before on how schists are formed by both water events. There will be a follow-up.
But I don't take orders from trolls. If you can prove me wrong, go for it. I would read the article first, though, since it is rather extensive.
Lista, not only springs from underground produce high temps, but rapid subduction of tectonic plates and volcanic activity would produce great heat as well. Flood event science is fascinating, as the Flood was a catastrophic event that dwarfs anything else the planet has seen. Tragedies like the Japan Earthquake or the Johnstown Flood are nothing compared to the Flood. Mt St Helens was a miniature teaching tool on the Grand Canyon formation but the Flood to Mt St Helens is like the Sun compared to a grain of sand.
Thanks Radar,
I Knew that you would Fill in the Rest. I was Thinking about Volcanic Activity as well, but was Trying to Keep my Comment more Simple and Allow you to say the Rest.
As to Mr. Anonymous, That's Why I don't allow Anonymous Commenters. I Figure if someone Wants to Talk Bad Enough, they can Sign Up and Identify themselves. I'd Like to See the Previous Link as well, yet am Just as Happy to Wait for your Follow Up.
in order to promote free speech I have allowed anonymous comments. If I notice bad language I delete them. If I notice spam I delete it. Blogger has a spam filter fortunately.
My latest post is the one with the schist discussions and the repost of the Ian Juby Flume testing that clearly identifies how sedimentary layers such as those exposed by the Grand Canyon can be formed by a massive flood event. In fact the testing shows precisely how the large number of one-way dino/amphibian tracks were produced as well.
Read my first day of Old Testament today. Those of you who wish to learn, join me. We'll get the Old Testament done in a year's time and I may post from time to time on the progress and observations. Genesis 1:1-3 may be close to the most hated portion of the OT for Darwinists, as it clearly states that the Universe was made in six days and that Adam and Eve were the first humans. You cannot actually believe the Bible is the Word of God and logically believe in macroevolution.
Free Speech is Preserved by the Fact that Anyone who Wants to can Sign Up and Comment, or for that Matter, Set Up their Own Blog, though we do all have the Right to Make these Decisions in Relation to Our Own Blogs.
I have Referred Satyavati to your Latest Post. I hope she Reads it. She is Still Asking me lots of Questions. Anytime that you can Find to Drop by my Blog, I'd Really Appreciate your Input.
I'll Try to Start Reading Genesis, though I Admit that these things can be rather Difficult to Keep Up with.
"One, I do not take orders from anonymous people."
And two, you couldn't back up your claim.
Thanks for playing.
"One, I do not take orders from anonymous people."
And two, you couldn't back up your claim.
Thanks for playing.
So you cannot read? There was a great big post on the subject!
"So you cannot read? There was a great big post on the subject!"
That proved that it was a water deposit, not a wind deposit? Try again. Maybe you're the one who can't read.
Who is the oddball who keeps posting on the wrong thread? This comment thread is about the Bible, okay? Lista was asking a question but if you want to learn about water formation of rocks read my "One year later" post.
Genesis 6:1 "When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. 3 Then the LORD said, “My Spirit will not contend with[m] humans forever, for they are mortal[n]; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown."
Travesty bordering on heresy, the new NIV characterizes the sons of God as if they were another race aka angels? But Jesus clearly specified that angels are not male and females. The meaning of this verse is that believing people married unbelievers and were led astray. There is nothing in the Hebrew to support the concept of a mixing of non-humans and humans in this verse. The new NIV translators are to be ashamed and should correct this!
http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2011/05/just-over-year-ago-today-i-introduced.html
I've Actually Heard this Verse Interpreted as Aliens (Yes, that is UFOs) Cohabiting with Humans and Creating Off Spring that are Part Alien. Thanks for Giving me an Interpretation that Sounds more Normal.
Post a Comment