Surprise! New evidence supports Bush after all!
Thanks to Amy Proctor, who has put together a great deal of information on her blog concerning the intelligence that has been gathered in Iraq.
But the (mainly liberal) Main Stream News Media don't report this. Seems as if it is only news if it hurts America?
Amy's posting begins like this:
Media Ignores Bush Exoneration
On January 28, 2003, President George W. Bush delivered a State of the Union speech (full text) just 2 months before US troops entered Iraq. In his speech, the President made this statement as further proof that intervention with Saddam Hussein was not only necessary but inevitable:
"The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa ."
By October of that same year, those 16 words of the State of the Union address came back to haunt the President when it appeared the intelligence supporting the attempted procurement by Saddam of uranium from Niger was false. Political opponents accused the President of taking the country to war under false pretenses. Hence, "Bush Lied" rhetoric became the standard line of Democrats throughout America and anti-war activists throughout the world.
Since the war in Iraq began in March 2003, US troops have confiscated 3,000 hours of audiotapes of Saddam Hussein chairing his Revolutionary Command Council before the war and 48,000 boxes of records documenting his regime’s military activities. In February of this year, the first audio tapes were translation to English and examined after at the February meeting by the International Intelligence Summit. Some of the findings from Saddam’s recordings include:
-Saddam stated Iraq will allow UNSCOM to confirm their erroneous pre-war assessments
-Saddam was confident that Iraq would "overcome" the inspection program
-Saddam pointed out a major advantage – keeping the precursors for chemical weapons separated until needed and they can be explained away as having civilian use.
While there are some whacko liberal politicos who are suggesting the President be censured or even impeached for the NSA terrorist wiretapping policies and the War in Iraq, here is a body of evidence that proves that President Bush did not lie to the American people.
Of course, this was always a phony allegation. The President was saying the same things that his intelligence sources gave him, which is why Bill Clinton said those things and other world leaders said those things. Saddam's own generals thought he had WMD's stashed secretly. Saddam had gone to Africa to seek uranium. Saddam was planning to use WMD's again as soon as the outcry from the world had died down. We see evidence that he had what WMD's he'd had previously shipped across the border to Syria.
New evidence from Iraqi documents now shows that terrorists, including Al Quaeda, were training in Iraq long before we targeted Saddam's regime. After the beating the news media gave the administration over this key point, you would think that they would have the decency to admit their mistakes and publish the news far and wide.
No matter. These days, we have more diversity in the news media and we have the internet, where bloggers like Amy will seek out the truth. Amy's blog.
But the (mainly liberal) Main Stream News Media don't report this. Seems as if it is only news if it hurts America?
Amy's posting begins like this:
Media Ignores Bush Exoneration
On January 28, 2003, President George W. Bush delivered a State of the Union speech (full text) just 2 months before US troops entered Iraq. In his speech, the President made this statement as further proof that intervention with Saddam Hussein was not only necessary but inevitable:
"The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa ."
By October of that same year, those 16 words of the State of the Union address came back to haunt the President when it appeared the intelligence supporting the attempted procurement by Saddam of uranium from Niger was false. Political opponents accused the President of taking the country to war under false pretenses. Hence, "Bush Lied" rhetoric became the standard line of Democrats throughout America and anti-war activists throughout the world.
Since the war in Iraq began in March 2003, US troops have confiscated 3,000 hours of audiotapes of Saddam Hussein chairing his Revolutionary Command Council before the war and 48,000 boxes of records documenting his regime’s military activities. In February of this year, the first audio tapes were translation to English and examined after at the February meeting by the International Intelligence Summit. Some of the findings from Saddam’s recordings include:
-Saddam stated Iraq will allow UNSCOM to confirm their erroneous pre-war assessments
-Saddam was confident that Iraq would "overcome" the inspection program
-Saddam pointed out a major advantage – keeping the precursors for chemical weapons separated until needed and they can be explained away as having civilian use.
While there are some whacko liberal politicos who are suggesting the President be censured or even impeached for the NSA terrorist wiretapping policies and the War in Iraq, here is a body of evidence that proves that President Bush did not lie to the American people.
Of course, this was always a phony allegation. The President was saying the same things that his intelligence sources gave him, which is why Bill Clinton said those things and other world leaders said those things. Saddam's own generals thought he had WMD's stashed secretly. Saddam had gone to Africa to seek uranium. Saddam was planning to use WMD's again as soon as the outcry from the world had died down. We see evidence that he had what WMD's he'd had previously shipped across the border to Syria.
New evidence from Iraqi documents now shows that terrorists, including Al Quaeda, were training in Iraq long before we targeted Saddam's regime. After the beating the news media gave the administration over this key point, you would think that they would have the decency to admit their mistakes and publish the news far and wide.
No matter. These days, we have more diversity in the news media and we have the internet, where bloggers like Amy will seek out the truth. Amy's blog.