That Darwinism is anti-science is proved by the existent of the NCSE. Darwinism is Paganism and not science.
What shall we call the NCSE? National Censors of Scientific Evidence? No Creationists Says Eugenie? No Credible Scientific Evidence (for Darwinism)? Nonsensical Cult Supporting Evolution?
The first two parts of this post reveal that Darwinists and the NCSE are afraid of the evidence, want to stifle dissent and bury all evidence concerning origins other than their own fairy tales. The third article shows that Darwinists, by their illogical and magical thinking, have indeed managed to do precisely what Paul predicted in the Bible almost two thousand years ago.
NCSE Takes on Creation Geologists
The science of geology operates in parallel universes. There are the mainstream, secular geologists in the Geological Society of America who have complete hegemony in the secular universities, the mainline journals and the secular press. Then there are the creation geologists, who publish in their own journals; these hardly enter the awareness of the other geologists. Once in a while, though, like disturbances in the Force, emanations from the creation universe into the secular universe are felt. The National Center for Science Education has become so alarmed at these emanations that they have warned secular geologists to (1) pay them no attention, and (2) pay attention.You can read the rest here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eugenie Scott? Named for Eugenics? Was she a Jezebel from birth? No, actually she was a child born of Christian Scientists who has over the years claimed to be a Protestant, a Secular Humanist and then at last a Atheist but still claims a "Spiritual" side. What kind of spirit that might be I shudder to think. But she is absolutely one thing for certain - an anti-education censor who leads a group dedicated to censorship. If you have read 1984 you understand what this kind of thinking represents. Eugenie Scott wants the Federal Government to be Big Brother and she thinks she is part of the Thought Police.
Eugenics was the bright idea of Darwin's cousin Francis Galton that, in concert with Malthusian propaganda and the Darwinist concept that we evolved from apes and non-caucasians were less evolved, led to Aborigines being killed and skinned and placed in museums and was the excuse for numerous acts of genocide by various tyrants in the 19th and 20th Century. Darwinists hate to admit their links to Stalin and Hitler and Mao or, for that matter, Jeffery Dahmer but history knows better. In America it is forgotten that Eugenics led to forced sterilization of minorities and poor and handicapped folks in the pre-WWII era. In fact the Eugenics crowd praised Hitler in the early days of his reign in Germany and then, after the public began finding out what Hitler was really doing behind the lines the Eugenics organizations laid low and changed names. To, for instance, the group we call Planned Parenthood. If genocide is no longer tolerable then the plan changes and abortion on demand is provided instead, primarily in the areas where the poor and the minorities are most often found.
Also it appears that Scott is very afraid of both ID and Creation Science because she is willing to lie about it and hopes those lies will be believed:
Isn't that convenient for Eugenie Scott that she now claims that the courts have insulated evolution from any form of critique in public schools?
You can read the rest here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notice the phrase that Scott uses is "evidence against evolution?" She uses this no doubt because she knows quite well there is evidence against evolution, hard evidence, convincing evidence, and she is afraid that the public will hear of it and become interested and want to know more. It reminds me of one of my commenters, who likes to tell me that no one pays attention to my posts and that I do not post any evidence and nothing I write is worth reading and continually asks the same questions and refuses to accept or comprehend the answers. I think to myself, dude, if I am not accomplishing anything and there is no reason to read my blog and no reason to comment on it, why do YOU do read the blog and comment on it?
I know why I blog. Because learning should last a lifetime. If you quit learning you are beginning to die. I have learned that Darwinism is untrue and it is artificially propped up by a bunch of religious zealots who hate God or the idea of God. The idolatry of Darwinism is the shame of the scientific community and will eventually be a black stain on those who promoted it well beyond its expiration date. How many diseases might be cured had we used the resources wasted on trying to prove the unprovable in an attempt to help mankind? Why should our tax dollars go to the salary of a bunch of censors like the NCSE? Why should millions of dollars be wasted on SETI? While scads of scientists are trying over and over again to overturn a law like Biogenesis there are disorders and syndromes that could use more researchers.
Darwin's Sacred Imposter: Natural Selection's Idolatrous Trap
by Randy J. Guliuzza, P.E., M.D.
(Note: When this was written, Guliuzza was at odds with almost all other scientific creationists who know that natural selection is a fact. He seems to have modified his views recently, and points out how Darwinian selectionists demand that NS is a kind of creative force. —Cowboy Bob Sorensen)
He then visited the Humanist Club exhibit, where an evolutionist from Princeton University quoted a colleague who said:
You can read the rest here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"An atheist before Darwin could have said, following Hume: "I have no explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one." I can't help feeling that such a position, though logically sound, would have left one feeling pretty unsatisfied, and that although atheism might have been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist."
Isn't it odd that Dawkins is so intellectually satisfied but why is he then afraid to expose his satisfied intellect to debate with opponents? Excerpt:
"Richard Dawkins alleges that Charles Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist".[1] Yet, where is Richard Dawkins' intellectual conviction and courage? On May 14, 2011, the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph published a news story entitled Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God.[2] In The Daily Telegraph article Dr. Daniel Came, a member of the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University, was quoted as writing to fellow atheist Richard Dawkins concerning his refusal to debate Dr. William Lane Craig: "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[3]"
ROMANS 1:18-25 ESV -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why am I hard on Darwinism? Because I believe it goes beyond wrong to the realm of evil. Because it kills people. Because it ruins lives. Because is promotes racism and genocide. Because it exists only to deny the existence of God.
Darwinism helps convince innocent children that there is no God. It steals resources away from real scientific research. Darwinism will help send millions into despair as they find no reason for existence in a world with nothing but random accidents and no surety that anyone can even think for themselves. Darwinism will send millions of people to Hell. Darwinism was the excuse that allows Richard Dawkins to claim:
"An atheist before Darwin could have said, following Hume: "I have no explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one." I can't help feeling that such a position, though logically sound, would have left one feeling pretty unsatisfied, and that although atheism might have been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist."
— Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (1986), page 6
Isn't it odd that Dawkins is so intellectually satisfied but why is he then afraid to expose his satisfied intellect to debate with opponents? Excerpt:
"Richard Dawkins alleges that Charles Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist".[1] Yet, where is Richard Dawkins' intellectual conviction and courage? On May 14, 2011, the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph published a news story entitled Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God.[2] In The Daily Telegraph article Dr. Daniel Came, a member of the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University, was quoted as writing to fellow atheist Richard Dawkins concerning his refusal to debate Dr. William Lane Craig: "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[3]" References
- ↑ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/how-to-be-an-intellectually-fulfilled-atheist-or-not/
- ↑ Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God, The Daily Telegraph, May 14, 2011
- ↑ Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God, The Daily Telegraph, May 14, 2011
ROMANS 1:18-25 ESV -
God’s Wrath on Unrighteousness
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.