Another Reason To Question Evolution - It is an unscientific and unnecessary mythology used to fool the common man!
The Godevidence.com site is a tremendous online resource! If you happened to listen to the podcast that Piltdown Superman put up on this blog yesterday, you are fully prepared to read the argument made by Scott Youngren in the article below.
I also love the quote Scott referenced from C.S. Lewis:
“If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.”
Now think about what you know and why you know it. No doubt in grade school you were taught how to count with visual aids. Two blocks added to two blocks (or apples or whatever) were shown to be four blocks. Very simple, easy to see and understand. What we understand as being proven scientifically is often just a marker left on the marathon that is the advancement of human knowledge.Darwinist evolution is nothing like this at all. While science DID prove using the scientific method that nothing is created or destroyed in the natural world, that all of the natural world is running downhill and that life does not come from non-life, the so-called "science" of evolution breaks these laws without shame in order to advance a religion-based philosophy of Naturalism. To pretend that Darwinism is scientific at all is a sham, a fraud and a crime against the human mind! I can assert that with good conscience because the Laws of Thermodynamics and the Law of Biogenesis remain intact and Darwinism must be at odds with these laws. Darwinism is not scientific at all, it is an hypothesis that is used to prop up anti-God morality and for the pleasure of atheopaths. Evil men who wish to do things God forbids have always sought to pretend that there is no God so they can entice others to join them in their evil practices.
The God of the Gaps: Why God and science are not competing explanations.
“The common belief that… the actual relations between religion and science over the last few centuries have been marked by deep and enduring hostility… is not only historically inaccurate, but actually a caricature so grotesque that what needs to be explained is how it could possibly have achieved any degree of respectability.”–Cambridge University historian of science Colin Russell
“Just because science hasn’t explained something yet doesn’t mean that we should just give up and say, ‘God did it.’”
-A comment made, in various versions, by multiple atheist commenters to this website.
——————————-The cartoon above provides a good depiction of how many (perhaps most) atheists perceive God. They perceive him as an explanation for natural phenomena that competes with scientific explanations, and that serves to fill gaps in scientific understanding. But this perception is completely flawed and misguided.
To read the rest of that article, click on the link just above.