Further Evidence of Academic Anti-Creationist Discrimination
While atheists and other anti-creationists are sipping their Darwin cappuccinos in faculty lounges and other places, denying that discrimination and persecution against biblical creationists exist, the problems are escalating. For people who claim to be driven by evidence, it is appalling that they reject it.
There are numerous documented cases about this intentional and unintentional discrimination, but the guilty parties tend to stay in their safe places and are unaware of such publications. Like creative and performing arts attract outspoken leftists, atheists and Darwinists infest academic settings. Indeed, there is a disproportionate number of atheists in biological fields and academic settings than exist in the general population.
As others and I have maintained for quite a spell, it is not a matter of evidence and material that is intellectually satisfying. Instead, it is a spiritual matter. Atheists and other evolutionists are determined to proclaim Darwin (blessed be!), and resort to increasing their viperine propaganda methods.
If you saddle up and ride to higher ground for a better view, you might be able to see that keeping out Christians and creationists because evolution is intellectually incestuous. Science does not grow when presuppositions are unchallenged.
Take a look at how the intellectually dishonest National Center for Science Education was formed, and how Eugenie Scott has been on an atheistic jihad to make sure evolution is promoted at all costs. Some of these sidewinders believe it's okay to lie to students so they will accept evolution! A recent paper in PLoS ONE discussed this discrimination — and could have contained much more detail if they had used Dr. Jerry Bergman's volumes of documented evidence.
 |
| Made at PhotoFunia |
As others and I have maintained for quite a spell, it is not a matter of evidence and material that is intellectually satisfying. Instead, it is a spiritual matter. Atheists and other evolutionists are determined to proclaim Darwin (blessed be!), and resort to increasing their viperine propaganda methods.
If you saddle up and ride to higher ground for a better view, you might be able to see that keeping out Christians and creationists because evolution is intellectually incestuous. Science does not grow when presuppositions are unchallenged.
Take a look at how the intellectually dishonest National Center for Science Education was formed, and how Eugenie Scott has been on an atheistic jihad to make sure evolution is promoted at all costs. Some of these sidewinders believe it's okay to lie to students so they will accept evolution! A recent paper in PLoS ONE discussed this discrimination — and could have contained much more detail if they had used Dr. Jerry Bergman's volumes of documented evidence.
To read this article in its entirety, click on "New Evidence for Discrimination Against Christians in Academia".One recent study incorrectly claimed that “no researchers have attempted to experimentally document the existence of bias against Christians in science.” In fact, I have spent most of my academic career documenting this problem, but my work, although well-known among conservative Christians, intelligent design proponents, and creationist supporters, is ghettoized; thus, outside this circle, it is close to unknown. The scores of articles and several books documenting the problem that I have published include the following:. . .The religious contrast between scientists and the public is enormous. Specifically, only 33 percent of scientists claim that they believe in God, while, in contrast, fully 95 percent of Americans believe in God or some similar higher power. Polls of scientists reveals 41 percent of scientists are thoroughgoing atheists: they do not believe in God or any higher power. In contrast, polls of the public reveal only four percent of Americans accept the atheistic worldview. These numbers vary, depending on how the question is worded and the mood of the nation, but the contrast between scientists and the general public has held for over a century. The problem has now been documented by academics teaching at a major university, concluding that “Christians are one of the most underrepresented groups in science, and one potential explanation is that scientists have a bias against Christian students, which could discourage and actively prevent Christian students from becoming scientists.”