Phrenology Returns for Your Inner Ape

Failed and even harmful evolutionary pseudoscience ideas have come and gone over the years, but some were not buried deeply enough and Darwin's votaries dig them back up. Seems the hands at the Darwin Ranch wanted to bring back phrenology to determine who is a likely criminal.

Phrenology image provided by Flickr / William Creswell

Eugenics is used to determine who is worth keeping alive, the myth of larger brain size indicates greater intelligence, certain physical features indicate our alleged simian ancestry, and more. The idea of studying bumps on the head (peaks and valleys) was called phrenology, but was discarded long ago.

However, the phrenology idea was made to walk again by a bokor hired by the Darwinian death cult. It still uses physical features to describe criminal characteristics. These in turn are based on a passel of assumptions (evolution being the primary), so people who have superficial resemblances to apelike features in their heads and faces are less evolved. These, in turn, are more likely to chimp out and commit acts of violence and engage in criminal behavior. See how that works? Science is wonderful.

Is empirical science involved?

That'll be the day!

How about racism?

Sure. That should go without saying, considering the connections of evolution and racism.

How about bad logic, especially question-begging?

Most definitely.

Do they realize that our Creator endowed us with genes that express tremendous variety?

That doesn't enter the thinking of materialists, old son.

Let's take a look at what the cult has reanimated. We're probably going to have to kill it several times, you know.

The researchers claim that their results are consistent with the “prenatal hormone theory” – an idea supposing that fetal exposure to high levels of male sex hormones called androgens helps to determine sexual orientation. Why they assumed high levels of male hormones would determine homosexuality was not clear. The researchers cite this “much-contested claim” that these hormone exposures also result in gender-atypical faces.[9] The problem is, rather than producing objective insights, artificial intelligence (AI) programs often reinforce human biases. These biases, if trusted in practice, can harm already marginalized populations.

To read the full article, dig up "Darwinists Still Attempting to Prove Criminality is Genetic".