Search This Blog

Thursday, May 06, 2010

The CEO and the media are lacking in both class and brains. We need a hero! President Suit!!!

Tea-baggers. The President of the United States is calling a grassroots movement of people of all sorts generally known as Tea Party Patriots a nasty sexual slang word. This President is trying his best to divide America and arrogantly dismiss everyone who is not an elitist or a socialist or both.



You mean Obama said something that wasn't scripted and rolling across his teleprompter?! Whenever that happens we get a Joe the Plumber. Heck, even when the teleprompter works we get "corpsman." Did you know the Marines have zombies? Huh? What did he think he was saying?



Obama calls a Navy Corpsman a Corpse Man, not once but Three times at the Prayer Breakfast 2-4-10



I cannot nicely tell you what tea-bagging is (and didn't know since I am not familiar with the homesexual culture. How come the liberals always know this stuff?) but it is roughly the same thing as Udtu Na Uasta (sorry no cyrillic letters) if you know Russian. It's nasty. It's very much a gutter language term and a degrading slang against homosexual males being applied to the ordinary Americans who see the country abandoning the Constitution. This should be a wakeup call to people all over the country that they are not doing enough yet, they are not voting in the primaries and they had darned better vote in November.

~


Is too much sun on the head bad for the brain?

Arizona decides to make it a state law to enforce the federal law and suddenly the race card lunacy led by attention hog Illinois (!) lawmaker Luis Guitterez as people take to the streets angry that illegal aliens are going to be arrested for being illegal! Huh? Lose the race card, people, really. It is not about whether you are a latino, it is about whether you are here legally. It is about this:

  • Employers hiring cheap labor at illegally low wages and paying cash under the table so that Illegals being used as virtual slaves.
  • People given passage to the States and then finding themselves paying off ransom on themselves.
  • Kidnappings.
  • Drug cartels bringing product and violence across the borders with them
  • People making it across the border to have a child and then making him an
    "anchor child" excuse to bring over the whole family.
  • Terrorist organizations beginning to identify the Southern border as a good way to put members across the line.
  • Border states finding their schools and hospitals and all services being used by illegal aliens who are for the most part paying no taxes, being normally paid cash anyway.



What part of "terrorist who wanted to blow you into little fiery pieces" brings out the mothering instinct in lamestream media wonks?

The media are not only crying over this non-racism racism but did you see how reluctant they were to identify the erstwhile Times Square bomber as a terrorist. While the terrorist was able to put a truck full of dangerous explosives and accelerants in a place to do great damage, he did not have the detonator figured out and an alert vendor spotted smoke coming from the vehicle and called for help, hurrah for the man in the street!



Within a short time of the failed bombing, a pre-recorded message from a Pakistani terror group was being issued (apparently the first ones were recorded before the bombing as they seemed to think a great blow had been struck) - From Delaware Online, an excerpt:

"A Muslim terror group in Pakistan took credit for a failed car bombing in Times Square, even as the primary suspect in the investigation claimed to have acted alone, according to a law enforcement official.



Hakimullah Mehsud, head of Tehrik-e-Taliban and a man Pakistani intelligence agencies once said was killed in a missile strike, appeared in two videos posted on YouTube and militants' sites recently to say his group is preparing to move beyond fighting U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

Tehrik-e-Taliban spokesman Qari Mehsud claimed in a third video that the group was responsible for the Saturday night attack in Times Square, in retaliation for the killing of two top al-Qaeda in Iraq leaders last month, he said."







"Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said no evidence has surfaced to back up that claim. Attorney General Eric Holder said it was too early to say whether there is a foreign connection.

Faisal Shahzad, a U.S. citizen with ties to Pakistan, was arrested in connection with the plot as he boarded a flight set to leave a New York airport for Dubai.

A law enforcement official familiar with the circumstances of the arrest, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the investigation, says investigators still don't have evidence that Shahzad is connected to the Pakistani Taliban or any foreign terror groups. The official says, "He's claimed to have acted alone, but these are things that have to be investigated."

In 2007, numerous Taliban leaders in Pakistan grouped under the banner Tehrik-e-Taliban and fought the Pakistani army to a standstill in frontier areas of the country. The group has battled NATO troops in Afghanistan and was accused by Pakistan of assassinating politician Benazir Bhutto. In the past two years, it has shown a desire to target NATO countries, experts said.

"Regardless of the (Times Square claim) being true or not, they raise the specter of the Pakistan Taliban morphing into a more global platform and direct threat to the West," said Juan Zarate, who served as the George W. Bush administration's deputy national security adviser for combating terrorism."

Guess what, the video was made before we even caught the guy! Yet politically correct liberal loonbats wanted to blame the South Park episode, declared that he must have acted alone and moaned about the poor guy's sad personal life. One sad excuse for a reporter mourned over the fact that the suspect was an Islamic and a probable terrorist, probably wishing it had been a Tea Party WASP grandma. The Left hates the fact that illegal aliens are scrambling across the border and that terrorist want to kill us and wonder why we all can't just get along? We elected Obama, everyone give us a hug!

World leaders and terrorists and thugs and illegals are giving us something alright. It isn't a hug. So what can we do? It must be time for...President Suit!!!




Introducing President Suit and Frugal Cafe Blog Zone to the blog links...

18 comments:

radar said...

So was Martin Luther King, Jr. a Republican or Democrat?

Democrats controlled the South and protected Jim Crow laws all the way up to the 1960's. What part of Democrats are the enemy of the poor and the users of race and class warfare for political gain does America not understand?

Anonymous said...

Methinks thou dost protest too much...

What part of "all the way up to the 1960s" don't YOU understand? The year is 2010, and you have to go back almost half a century to pin racism on Democrats.

Maybe you should read up on the "Southern strategy".

Anonymous said...

Drinking and blogging is a terrible thing.

Seek help.

Hawkeye® said...

Radar,
That first picture which refers to the "Democrat Campaign Poster 1868" is probably wrong. I think that was actually a Republican campaign poster that was mocking the Democrats and their anti-Negro stance. The Democratic campaign platform in 1868 was "This is a white man's country: Let white men rule."

I'm being picky, I know. But I just thought I'd share.

(:D) Best regards...

Hawkeye® said...

Anonymous,
You said: "you have to go back almost half a century to pin racism on Democrats".

How 'bout this...

March 4, 2001: The Democratic Senator and KKK alumnus Robert Byrd of West Virginia tells Fox News's Tony Snow: "There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time; I'm going to use that word." Byrd's statement implies of course, that there are also "black niggers", but he got a pass from the Democrats and the liberal media.

When Republican Trent Lott wished Strom Thurmond a happy birthday and made an oblique comment that he should have been President, Lott was crucified by the Democrats and the liberal media. Dems have a funny way of employing a double standard.

Byrd once wrote this to the KKK's Imperial Wizard: "The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia."

Byrd led the Senate Democrats as late as December 1988. If Democrats were so offended by racism, why have they never have mounted a primary challenge against him or otherwise pressed this one-time cross-burner to get lost?

When President G.W. Bush named Condoleezza Rice as America's second (consecutive) black secretary of State, Byrd and other Senate Democrats stalled Rice's confirmation for a week. Amid unanimous GOP support, (12) Democrats and Vermont Independent James Jeffords opposed Rice -- the most "No" votes for a Sec State appointee since (14) senators frowned on Henry Clay in 1825. Why? Was it because she was black... or a woman? Either way, that's discrimination, isn't it?

Anonymous said...

One dinosaur (Byrd) and some speculative conjecture about why some Dems voted against Condy.

Yawn.

Don't know why it's so hard for you guys to accept that the Southern strategy herded the racists over to the Republicans. Led to some short-term electoral gains, sure, but it had (unwanted?) consequences.

Hawkeye® said...

Anonymous,
P.S.-- President Obama is a racist. He's not a white racist of course, but a black racist. Consider...

In "Dreams from My Father" Obama wrote: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race."

He chose to join and remain in Jeremiah Wright's church for 20 years because he agreed with the minister's anti-White sermons. He agreed with the church's black liberation theology which opposes racial integration. He was not offended when the church awarded a life-time achievement award to black racist Louis Farrakhan.

During the 2008 campaign, he described his grandmother as a "typical white person" who fears blacks.

Without bothering to learn all the facts, President Obama immediately sprang to the conclusion that Cambridge Police "acted stupidly" against his black friend Professor Henry Gates. He made charges of "racial profiling" when none occurred.

Obama refused to prosecute Black Panthers who wielded weapons, hurled racial insults at voters, and blocked the entrance at a Philadelphia polling place during the 2008 Election. Even though a case was brought against the men, and the case was WON, Obama ordered Attorney General Eric Holder to drop the charges.

Obama has played the race card on numerous occasions. During the campaign he played it against Bill Clinton directly (and Hillary indirectly) when Bill Clinton in an offhand remark observed that Obama would be likely to win the South Carolina primary because Jessie Jackson did well there.

He played the race card against Geraldine Ferraro when she accurately observed: "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

He's plays the race card whenever someone disagrees with his policies or proposals. To disagree with him automatically makes you a racist. The Tea Party people are racist. The Republicans are racist. Conservatives are racist. Wall Street fat-cats are racist.

Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, even though she asserted that a "wise Latina" would make a better judge than a "white male." And as an appellate judge, she agreed to throw out a New Haven, Conn. firefighters' promotion test because whites performed better than blacks.

Obama regularly uses divisive language to separate people into classes and pit them against one another. In a recent e-mail he sent out, he called on "young people, African Americans, Latinos and women who powered our victory in 2008 stand together once again." Victory against who? Old, white males? Of course! That's how racists talk.

WomanHonorThyself said...

Radar..TIMES SQUARE EVACUATED AGAIN!!

Anonymous said...

Hawkeye Says,

"Obama regularly uses divisive language to separate people into classes and pit them against one another. In a recent e-mail he sent out, he called on "young people, African Americans, Latinos and women who powered our victory in 2008 stand together once again." Victory against who? Old, white males? Of course! That's how racists talk."

Oh, so that's how racists talk. Thanks for that. I mean, who better to make that determination than you Hawkeye? You have any more earth shattering Obabma "birther" info for us, while you're at it? LOL.

Oh and while we're doing our History of Racism lesson. That Tea Party of yours has some trouble of it's own in this area.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB1N6XbyZTk

- Canucklehead.

highboy said...

If someone really thinks we need to go back that far to find racism among the democratic party they simply aren't paying attention. The democrats have advocated and supported by and large nearly every racial set aside known to man, from college grants to minorities, to forcing businesses into quotas for racial hiring, to just about anything else involving racial set asides and quotas.

creeper said...

Pretty juvenile, Radar.

-- creeper

Hawkeye® said...

Canucklehead,
"I mean, who better to make that determination than you Hawkeye?"

There's no one "better" than me to make that determination.

Hawkeye® said...

Canucklehead,
You want videos? I got videos...

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/7165215/18659668

Hawkeye® said...

Canucklehead,
By the way, regarding your YouTube video, to quote someone who already commented here...

"The year is 2010, and you have to go back almost half a century to pin racism on [somebody]".

Well Rachel Maddow had to go all the way back to 1965 to find evidence of racism, and she made a big deal about it. She said that this is "recent history". Look, you can't have it both ways. Either 1965 is "recent history" or it isn't.

If the 1960s is "recent history", then you have to look at the Southern DEMOCRATS in Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi who were by far the biggest proponents of those "literacy tests" she was talking about.

As for Tom Tancredo, he is not a leader, representative, agent or spokesperson for the Tea Party. However, in his speech, he correctly suggested that many of the people who voted Obama into office would probably not be able to pass a political literacy test. Obama was voted into office by those who were "undecided" up until the last minute. Those are the people who are LEAST likely to do any research on the candidates. They are the MOST likely to vote with their "feelings" when they walk into the voting booth. I agree with Tancredo when he suggests that they could use some education.

And Tancredo was not saying that we should go back to discriminating against black people (like the Democrats did in 1965) in order to keep them from voting. Rachel Maddow's subtle insinuation that this is the motivation behind the Tea Party movement is nothing short of slander in my opinion.

And Maddow's guest, Charles Ogletree was no better. He said: "And the reality is, there are still people who don't want him to be President because he's doing things they don't like. And so race becomes a dividing issue..."

WHAT??? That has to be the biggest non sequitur in all of human history. Where is the logic in that statement?

People don't want Obama to be President because they don't like what he's doing. Therefore they are racists. HUH???

Gimme a break! I can't believe that guy is a law professor. He certainly wouldn't qualify to be a professor of Logic.

I don't like what Obama is doing. I didn't want him to be President in the first place. I wish he wasn't President now. And I can't wait for him to be voted out of office.

But that doesn't make me a racist, and I have an Equal Employment Opportunity hiring record to prove it. One of the African-American men I hired is quoted as saying of me: "He doesn't have a prejudiced bone in his body." Not bragging. Just saying.

creeper said...

Highboy,

So any attempts to counteract the effects of past racism are themselves racist. Glad you straightened that out for us.

Chaos Engineer had an excellent comment on a recent race-related post on this blog here:

"To be fair, I don't think readers are offended when you criticize racists as such. I think they're offended because you're selective in your criticism...it's easy to get the impression that you're willing to ignore racism in your friends, and that makes you look insincere when you criticize racism in your enemies.

[...] look at the people you've called racists in this thread. I count seven Democrats (including Woodrow Wilson), a crazy person, and Charles Darwin. Most of them haven't been in the news for months or years. Can't you think of any racists on your side to denounce? Racist Tea Party Patriot Carl Paladino was in the news just this week. Virginia governor Bob McDonnell, Mississippi governor Haley Barbour, and National Review writer John Derbyshire also made some rather unpleasant racist remarks. All this week."


-- creeper

radar said...

Juvenile? Really? You mean history is juvenile and propaganda is adult? It was Democrats who segregated the military and promoted Jim Crow. It was Democrats who fought to keep segrated schools in the South. It was Republicans who drove the fight to end segregation in this country.

It was, however, the Democrats who realized that, much like native americans in reservations, if the inner city poor were offered pittance payments in exhange for having babies and being indigent then an entire army of serfs could be created. The primary differences between the ghetto of the inner city and a typical reservation is the lack of a legal casino. Give the Latin Kings a casino license and maybe the inner city poor, who tend to be people of color, would have just a tad more money.

One of the greatest hypocrisies in the history of this country is the idea that the Democrats are the friend of people of color. Democrats promote abortion, a process that kills a disproportionate number of black and mixed race babies. Democrats set up the welfare/ADC system that kills the standard family unit and withdraws the father from the family. Democrats continue to offer small subsidies to poor people to give them things that are unearned while taking them from our children's children. Democrats fight against the greatest weapon inner city parents could have against ignorance, the school voucher. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are in it for the money and power and use their names to fight for the wrong causes for the wrong reasons. Democrats want racial tensions to remain so they can play upon them politically. Hypocrites!!!

highboy said...

"So any attempts to counteract the effects of past racism are themselves racist. Glad you straightened that out for us."

Its not a matter of opinion creeper, its a matter of simple fact. When you set aside special interests specifically based on race, you are discriminating according to race. That is racism. Cold hard fact. Same with racial quotas, and your implication that these policies are countering past racism is simply false. We already have laws against discrimination according to race across the U.S. and the government forcing certain businesses to interview and hire based specifically on race is racist. To have standards enforced for companies to have a quota is racist. To have scholarship funds specifically for a race is racist. Its not countering past racisms, its not undoing past racisms, its not even making up for past racisms. Its simply taking the discrimination from one group and moving it to another. The democratic party has been the leading advocate for all these ridiculous policies, so my accusation stands. Its a simple fact.

creeper said...

"Juvenile? Really? You mean history is juvenile and propaganda is adult?"

No, the opposite if anything.

See if you can spot the juvenile propaganda in your post.

-- creeper