Listen to the Humbugs sing...Darwinism is so dead!

The Australian Brush Turkey, or Megapode. An absolute mystery to Darwinists and a signal from God for Creationists! Pictures from Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis, who also posted on this subject: Megapodes!!! Excerpt: "While in Australia, each morning I go for a 3-mile walk through a National Park right on the Coast. I meet many turkeys on this beautiful walk. These turkeys are fascinating—they are called “incubator birds.” This morning I took a photograph of part of the trail I walk through and a photo of one of the birds and a nest (taken at 6:30 am Thursday morning). What a reminder of creation—how could such a bird just evolve by natural processes? I downloaded some material from the internet (from www.straight-talk.net) that will explain more about the birds and the large nests they build:" The rest of the article. I (radar) have yet to meet a Darwinist that can even begin to explain the Australian Brush Turkey or Megapode, a bird that makes a huge pile of dirt and sticks and twigs and leaves to hatch its eggs and knows EXACTLY what temperature to keep the eggs and exactly when to add leaves or scratch away dirt. Every Brush Turkey male and female knows exactly what to do concerning building mounds and laying eggs just so and coordinating activities, which is completely ridiculous from a Darwinist viewpoint. No parents teach the offspring anything. Every newly-hatched Brush Turkey knows to begin digging out like mad from the mound to get out before starving or dying of thirst, fully ready to run and fly upon meeting fresh air. Every young brush turkey hatchling innately understands when a predator approaches without being taught by a parent. Without guide of parents, the hatchlings grow up to do the exact same inexplicable things...inexplicable unless you consider that God might like to leave a few clues that He did, indeed, make all things. A bird as unusual as a Bombadier Beetle? 

There a plenty of such examples in nature, organisms that never could have evolved to be what they are if Darwinism was true. This Megapode has all sorts of evolutionary disadvantages and furthermore has behavior that cannot be explained by mutation and natural selection. As if those two have ever accomplished anything in tandem. To add to the Facilitated Variation and Genetic Redundancy findings of modern science that have put the lie to Darwin, allow me to present even more scientific evidence to see if that zombie Chance, the Evolution Fairy will finally and fully be put into the grave...

Evolution of multicellularity: what is required?

You can read the full article at the link above.

All evolution assumes either the augmentation of some prior system to fit a new need, or lateral gene transfer adding information for the same end. Even systems that seem to require completely new structures (feathers for example) are assumed to be modified from pre-existing structures. However, there are two significant events in evolutionary history where far more would have been required—the origin of life, and the origin of co-ordinated multicellularity.

~ I keep posting articles focusing on the cell at the microbiological level to help people understand that Darwinists are used car salesmen who do not know what is under the hood. I am showing you what is under the hood and it ain't macroevolution! The cell is determined to reproduce the same kind. Variation is built in to the cell within the genetic coding within the DNA but the cell controls the child and forces a reproduction built upon the framework of the mother. Switches are prepared in advance to turn on or off when mutations occur.

Great redundancies are built in to the cells, far beyond the bounds of logic if Darwinism was involved in any way. The cell is clearly designed with all sorts of contingencies and redundancies with hardware and software more complex and efficient than any computer man has been able to make. Now we also see the barriers that would prevent single-cell organisms from becoming true multi-cellular creatures. While Darwinists talk about whether a bacteria can "jump domains" the fact is that there is no conceivable way for a jump from a single-cell organism to a multiple cell single organism. Darwinism is so dead it is irretrievably dead. It has had the stake driven into the heart, the silver bullet has shattered it's breastbone and a shotgun has blown off it's zombie head. It is a HUMBUG!

When you read the comments, notice how the issues brought up by Facilitated Variation and Genetic Redundancy let alone this last post about the barrier to Multicellular Evolution are not truly addressed? The commenters have been rehashing the same old talking points while I have been systematically walking my readers through the scientific study of the cell at the microscopic level and the level where the DNA rubber is meeting the Cellular road. If you have been a regular reader since March you have seen the foundation for Darwinism revealed as shifting sand, unable to support a hypothesis, let alone a theory and certainly NOT accepted fact. Hoax. Humbug. Canard. Words like that. Darwinists have learned enough about the cell to realize that their belief system has no basis. How long will they prolong the agony?