|Haeckel used the following chart to show that we resemble these animals. This is how he drew the embryos of each. Haeckel used deception to convince others that Evolution was true.|
But Haeckel changed the drawings of each animal to make them look like they were similar.
|At the top of this chart you will see how Haeckel drew each embryo. But at the bottom you will see a real picture of what each embryo really looks like:|
Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny was embraced by many people because they could use it to justify things like abortion. But the main reason people believed it, was because the only alternative to believing in Evolution, was to believe in God.
Ernst Haeckel was a professor of zoology in Germany from 1865 until 1909. In 1868, he fabricated the embryologic evidence for evolution by fraudulently producing the diagrams to prove? the theory. Reputable German scientists immediately began refuting his evidence, demonstrating that Haeckel had falsified his pictures. Notwithstanding, these diagrams have been taught in biology textbooks at the high school and university levels as recently as the 1990s and the idea they purport to prove is still presented in textbooks today.
The so-called gill slits of a human embryo have nothing to do with gills, and the human embryo does not pass through a fish stage or any other evolutionary stage. The development of the human embryo reveals steady progress toward a fully functional human body. Never in the course of development does a human embryo absorb oxygen from water as fish do with gills. (The human embryo is fully supplied with oxygen through the umbilical cord.) In fact, these gill slits? are not even slits.
So what are these misnamed structures? Actually, they are nothing more than folds in the region of the tiny embryo's throat. These folds are called pharyngeal arches, since they are arch-shaped folds near the throat. (Pharyngeal is the scientific word for things having to do with the throat. When you say you have a sore throat, your doctor says you have pharyngitis.) The creases between the folds are called pharyngeal clefts, and the undersides of the folds are called pharyngeal pouches."
[Elizabeth M. Mitchell, M.D., wife of AiG speaker Dr. Tommy Mitchell, received a bachelor of science in chemistry from Furman University in 1980, graduating summa cum laude. She graduated from Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in 1984 and completed her residency training in obstetrics and gynecology at Vanderbilt University Affiliated Hospitals in 1988. She earned fellowship in the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and practiced medicine in Gallatin, Tennessee, until 1995, when she retired from private practice to devote herself more fully to the needs of her three children.]
Darwinist websites tend to post lies like the ones exposed above. For instance, I commend to you this link that takes you to several good pictures of Acambaro figurines. Acambaro figurines have been investigated and tested and have proven to be genuine artifacts made by long-dead men who evidently lived at a time when dinosaurs were not uncommon. I have made many posts on the subject...only one person of low character hired to proclaim the figurines fakes has been often credited with "falsifying" the artifacts, while Mexican authorities and several American scientists and also detective novel writer and expert Earl Stanley Gardner all did tests and experiments and went so far as to dig under the local sheriff's own house only to find figurines buried there as well. The figurines were genuine, being buried in undisturbed ground, having the patina typical of long burial and with no local kilns capable of making them found. In fact the figurines were at first being sold for practically nothing by natives unaware of their historic value, so modern production of the figures would not be practical.
Lies are part and parcel of the Darwinist story. Morphology is being falsified by DNA study. Careful study of reproduction has revealed hardened systems in place to conserve the kind. The mother lays the framework for the child. Meta-information is included in the information passed from the parents that is specific to the kind (baramin) so that, while speciation can happen and in fact there are pre-existing switches that can aid speciation, there is no evidence in the study of organisms that supports macroevolution. Facilitated Variation studies show us how organisms are designed with information that provides for contingencies and redundancies. Organisms have sophisticated, complex, highly efficient systems that make human factories look primitive. Organisms are now being studied by engineers so that mankind can try to copy the superior designs of organisms. I would say that the study of organisms leads one to believe in a Creator. I would also say that real science agrees with me. Looking forward to the day Darwinism hits the dustbin...