The Darwinists in America are propagandists and censors on the scale of those of Soviet Russia in the days of the Iron Curtain. They fear Darwinism being questioned and scrutinized, because it cannot bear it. While Darwin himself believed all aspects of origins should be studied and his own ideas put to the test, his adherents are as rigid as Stalinists and will do almost ANYTHING to keep evidence for Intelligent Design and Creation to be presented.
As I learned in the military (intelligence services/journalist), having been based for a time at the War College and familiar with military tactics, the situation is obvious. Darwinists realize their myth is vulnerable, so they have surrounded it with their best defensive fortifications and vigorously attack any ideas that approach their hypothesis with the weapons they fear - evidence and logic. Why is there an NCSE at all? It exists to censor and for no other purpose.
Non-Darwinist academics, scientists and other professionals find themselves fired and blacklisted and denied tenure. Their scientific papers are rarely accepted for peer review and, if they are published, the outcry from the Darwinist High Priests usually cause the paper to be withdrawn from publication and the publishing source must apologize profusely lest they also face the Darwinist ban. The USA may be yet the land of the free and the home of the brave, but in academic and scientific circles, the Kommisars rule with an iron fist and censorship is their weapon of choice.
If Darwinists fear Intelligent Design and Creation presentations, scientific papers, books, movies and teachings, it is absolutely justified because they KNOW their myth cannot stand scrutiny and comparison to what we now know in the real world.
The story of the Darwinists in America is the story of blatant hypocrisy, jealousy, fear and frankly pure evil. They lie, they distort, they hide evidence and they brutally persecute every non-Darwinist they are able to attack with impunity. Fear is the primary motivating factor. How long can Darwinists keep the lid on the truth?
This is why I started the Darwinist Hall of Shame...which will continue shortly.
- See more at: http://crev.info/2013/07/evolutionists-two-faced-about-academic-freedom/#sthash.9xcwczH0.dpuf
You Cannot Trust Evolutionists
If you think this is an outrageous statement, you might want to take a deep breath and continue reading. When I was a Ph.D. student, one of the myriad articles I had to read and digest was aptly titled, “Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics.” Although this phrase is attributed alternately to both Mark Twain and Victorian England’s most famous Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, the complete quote is, “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” The point of the article was to note something that is well established, that statistics can be manipulated to support anything. When deceptive tactics are applied to evolutionary dogma, and this fallacious evidence becomes part of the history of modern science, you can begin to understand the enormity of the problem. The vast majority of scholars in the scientific community are agenda driven and, therefore, incapable of avoiding researcher bias connected to their hyper-materialistic evolutionary worldview.
The Kinsey reports (one in 1948 on males and the companion five years later) claimed that sexual activity began much earlier in life... and displayed less horror of age differences and same-sex relationships than anyone at the time imagined. It was as if, to follow Mr. Porter again, “Anything goes.” In Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports ... Kinsey et al. ... questioned an unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a survey of “normal” sexual behavior. Presumably, some at least of those offenders were also the sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from pedophiles--or so it must be hoped. Kinsey... has left his former co-workers some explaining to do.
Where Darwin’s theory is concerned, deception began very early on. It has continued for the past 150-plus years. The short list of some of the icons of evolution that turned out to be evolutionary frauds includes, vestigial organs (Wells, 2000; Rowitt, 2011), the Miller/Urey experiments, Piltdown man, Nebraska man, the Peppered Moths (Wieland, 2007), Darwin’s Finches (Luskin, 2012; Wells, 2000), etc., and a host of other so-called evidence in support of Darwinian evolution.
As you read this, you may wonder why evolution should be limited to changes tacked on at the end of the process of development. So did evolutionary biologists, and Haeckel's idea was quickly discarded. In fact, evolution can affect all phases of development, removing developmental steps as well as adding them, and therefore embryology is not a strict replay of ancestry. Nonetheless, many of the stages that embryos pass through can indeed be understood as remnants of their evolutionary past. (Emphasis added)One example is the fact that the embryos of all placental mammals (including humans) form a yolk sac during their development. Why is this important? Because the eggs of these organisms do not have large amounts of stored yolk, and therefore their yolk sacs are empty! Nonetheless, the persistence of a yolk sac stage makes perfect sense when one considers that these animals are descended from egg-laying reptiles in which the sac encloses a massive amount of yolk to support embryonic development, (Miller, 1997).
Accomplished liars will look you squarely in the eye and lie to you with a straight face. You may be so thoroughly brainwashed by the molecules-to-men story of life on planet Earth that cannot even conceive that you might be completely wrong about evolution. Evolutionists are always very serious when they speak about their common faith. They use bait and switch deception with regard to microevolutionary changes being promoted as evidence of molecules-to-men. Because they have a monopoly on what is taught in our public educational institutions, allowing only one explanation for the origin of life and censoring any information they deem critical to their evolutionary faith, they indoctrinate rather than educate their students.
We now know that finches actually have a mechanism to "shortcut" the switch in beak sizes built in to the organism (Kirschner and Gerhart - The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma), by the way. Ironically, Kirschner and Gerhart actually provided a great deal of evidence FOR creation/ID with their research rather than helping Darwinism along. They provided insight into the internal mechanisms of the cell during reproduction and, of course, discovered more information and complexity and design as they went along. Then they just pasted a Darwin label on it and published.
Rapid speciation is helped along by certain features being capable of switching on or off and also the ability of some genetic material to be transferred from one organism to another, which is seen in bacteria. However, the entire process is systematic, guided by the cell and using information from the DNA strand. Mutations are deleterious and, when passed down, tend to cause harm to the overall fitness of the organism. We NEVER observe new features or functions come from mutations, only broken systems. If a wingless beetle has an advantage on a windy island because of a mutation, it will thrive on that island but would be quickly driven to extinction in any other environment. If an e.coli bacteria will ingest citrate in all circumstances, it will be more likely driven to extinction in any environment that has other food sources as citrate is not optimal and normally only ingested in anaerobic conditions. After all, the e.coli could always ingest citrates, but this mutation seems to be a broken system:
"...So what happened? It is not yet clear from the published information, but a likely scenario is that mutations jammed the regulation of this operon so that the bacteria produce citrate transporter regardless of the oxidative state of the bacterium’s environment (that is, it is permanently switched on). This can be likened to having a light that switches on when the sun goes down—a sensor detects the lack of light and turns the light on. A fault in the sensor could result in the light being on all the time. That is the sort of change we are talking about.
We also know that life cannot possibly come from non-life nor can information be produced by the natural world and, in fact, information itself is not a material substance. In fact it appears that life is not a material substance, either. We can count containers of information but not the information itself. We can determine whether an organism is alive or dead but we cannot isolate a milligram of "life" nor can we separate information from it's containers and display it.
Again, Darwinism is simply a restated myth. The entire idea is recycled Pantheism and the idea of life coming from some primordial mud puddle is just a regurgitation of the Golem myth.
Information is understood by minds and generated by minds. That is what we observe in real science. A mind can build an answering machine to operate without a person being present to answer a phone call. The answering machine does not have a mind. But without someone to listen to the messages, it is of no use. Bees and many other organisms have algorithms built in to them that allow them to navigate as if they were carrying a Cray supercomputer on their backs...it took a brilliant mind to devise these algorithms. No lightning striking mud created life and no horse ever evolved from a bacteria. That is the stuff of science fiction novels/movies...and Darwinists!
There is no mud monster and there is no such thing as macroevolution or chemical evolution.