Darwinist Hall of Shame - Ernst Haeckel - guest poster Bob Sorensen, Director of The Question Evolution Project!
Today's post is authored by Bob Sorensen with backing by an article by E. van Neikerk of Creation.com
The article ends with a YouTube video discovered by Bob. Bob is the Director of The Question Evolution Project and the Piltdown Superman blogger.
Bob's work has drawn criticism and attacks from Darwinists. This is an indication that he is doing good work, for he is encountering opposition and even harassment! But Bob soldiers on and so do I...
We
have already shown that textbooks contain bad and even fraudulent material.
Although the secret is out, it is still happening: Junk is still in textbooks (as
you can see in the articles here). Worse, people like Eugenie Scott and
others encourage "educators" to lie to their students.
The end justifies the means, ja mein herr?
One of the perpetually perpetrated propaganda pieces is the use of the Haeckel drawings that have been known to be fake for years.
One of the perpetually perpetrated propaganda pieces is the use of the Haeckel drawings that have been known to be fake for years.
And yet, the topic is still
controversial; not only is the subject a huge embarrassment to evolutionists,
but some are still trying to defend the fraud! (One guy Tweeted to me that it
didn't matter that the drawings were fake, they were still true. Facepalm.) While creationists may make mistakes, we do not resort to defending,
rehabilitating, and perpetuating outright fraud.
It would help curtail their embarrassment if they did not keep putting this nonsense in the textbooks!
I learned about the following article and video from a friend of the ministry. It is by E. van Niekerk, who has studied zoology and is finishing a degree in engineering.
It would help curtail their embarrassment if they did not keep putting this nonsense in the textbooks!
I learned about the following article and video from a friend of the ministry. It is by E. van Niekerk, who has studied zoology and is finishing a degree in engineering.
For more than a century, one of the foremost bastions of Darwinian evolution has been that embryos of different animals pass through a similar stage in which they resemble one another very closely. Although embryologists had long known this to be false, a bomb exploded in 1997 when an embryologist actually published real photos of embryos, showing many more differences than previously thought. The embarrassment to the evolutionary community was severe. But now a historian has made a serious attempt to rehabilitate Haeckel by revising both the history and the science around his claims.
To read the rest, click on "Countering revisionism—part 1: Ernst Haeckel, fraud is proven."