Updated: Barack Obama, who cares about race or religion? Not me.

UNCLE SAM WANTS YOU TO THINK ABOUT THESE THINGS

I do not give a rip about what color President Obama's skin might be and he can be any religion he likes. But he is a socialist and the country needs to wake up and realize this. The guy first ran for office under the flag of the New Party.

UPDATE: Here is a fairly long list of proofs that Barack Obama did in fact not only run under the New Party flag but first won office as a NP member and signed documents dedicating himself to the cause. Read it before you say it ain't so...because it is!

If you keep an eye on the activities of this administration, watch for attempts to "neutralize" radio programs. Remember the "Fairness Doctrine?" Did you notice the "Net Neutrality" attempt that failed? The government does not want freedom of speech to continue.

You will see the Tea Party movement get demonized. If attempts to make Tea Party members do something radical fail, a fake Tea Party member will be recorded doing something dastardly. This is no game. This is the attempt of the socialists to take control of the country and make it permanent. This administration wants to control the news and the internet. This is not about personalities but rather principles. Vote your principles this year or just slide into the comfortable numbness of socialism. You, the voter, are the decider. Will the country turn back towards Constitutional principles or will the Obama Administration will put an end to America and turn us into something else.

From American Thinker


October 08, 2008 (Original post date)(links on orignal article)
Archives prove Obama was a New Party member (updated)
Thomas Lifson

Another piece in the puzzle of Barack Obama has been revealed, greatly strengthening the picture of a man groomed by an older generation of radical leftists for insertion into the American political process, trading on good looks, brains, educational pedigree, and the desire of the vast majority of the voting public to right the historical racial wrongs of the land.


The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of "fusion" failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling. But dissolving the party didn't stop the membership, including Barack Obama, from continuing to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success.

Erick Erickson, editor of RedState, explained fusion in a Human Events article:


Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let's call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama's New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.


The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. "After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century .... In 1996, it helped Chicago's Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district .... The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued."

Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.


J. Brown of Politically Drunk on Power has dug up multiple documentary sources (with hyperlinks) proving that Barack Obama was a member of the New Party, despite alleged attempts to cover up his tracks by scrubbing evidence. He or she deserves tremendous praise for doing this detective work.

Obama's career bears many signs of being helped along by the radical left. At the critical moment when he entered electoral politics, he was part of a movement to take over an established political party and direct it to the task of building a socialist America.



Hat tip: Rocco DiPippo

Update:

Erick Erickson and Rick Moran were onto the story last June.

Update:

More evidence, from the leftist publication New Ground 42, in 1995, before Obama had run for office. (emphasis added)


About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions. The NP's political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to "win". This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.


The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia's District; and Barack Obama, chief of staff for State Sen. Alice Palmer. Obama is running for Palmer's vacant seat.

Barack Obama entered electoral politics as a member of a radical marxist group aimed at gaining control of the Democratic Party in order to implement a hardline version of socialism in America. He signed a contract promising to maintain a visible relationship. The candidate should be pressed by McCain/Palin to reveal that contract and proclaim his adherence to New Party goals before the American people approve him for our hifghest office.

From Glenn Beck

(Links are available on original article)

The response:

Barack Obama Sr. (Dad)

*Communist who saw nothing wrong with government 'taxing 100%' so long as the people got benefits...
- Obama Sr. on socialism (Link)
- Overview of the paper (Link)
*Harvard educated economist
*Nairobi bureaucrat who advised government to 'redistribute' income through higher taxes
*Demonized corporations
*Abandoned Barack Obama Jr. when he was 2 years old to continue at Harvard (teaching son that ideology is more important than family)

Stanley Ann Dunham (Mom)

*Communist sympathizer
*Practiced 'critical theory' (aka Marxism)
*Influenced by Nietzsche and Freud
*Left Hawaii for Indonesia, Pakistan
*Attended a leftist church nicknamed the 'little red church' because of its Communist sympathies
*Left Barack Obama Jr.

Mentor

*Barack's grandparents introduced Barack Obama Jr. to poet and communist Frank Marshall Davis (Link)
*Davis becomes a mentor as young Barack struggled with abandonment by parents

College & Church

*Admittedly sought out 'Marxist' professors (Link)
*Admittedly attended 'socialist conferences' (Link)
*Began attending a Marxist church - led by pastor Jeremiah Wright (attended for 20 years) (Link)

Career

*Tragedy of the Warren Court: No redistributive change (Link)
*Voted for TARP (Link)
*$787 billion stimulus redistribution bill
*Healthcare bill admittedly about 'redistributing the wealth'
*Single Payer Healthcare proponent (Link)
*President Obama now also President of GM & Chrysler
*President Obama seizes control of insurance giant AIG
*President Obama is leading America to single payer healthcare
*President Obama seized control of Student Loan industry in order to 'cut out middle man'
*President Obama seizes control in massive land grabs
*Repeatedly vilifies 'the rich'
*Obama believes race problems can be solved through redistribution of wealth... he said "race is still an enormous factor in our society. But economics can overcome a lot of racial division."
*Trying to regulate the Internet via FCC
*Forces mortgage co's to cover people who aren't paying mortgage (Link)
*Extends unemployment benefits to 99 weeks (Link)
*Told Joe the plumber 'it's better when you spread things around' (Link)

Family, Friends, Advisors & Administration

*Wife Michelle Obama said “The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.”
*Jim Wallis, Obama's spiritual advisor & forced redistribution of wealth advocate
*Van Jones, disgraced Green Jobs Czar & Communist
*Ron Bloom, Manufacturing Czar & anti-free market
*John Holdren, pro-redistribution of wealth
*Andy Stern, SEIU President & redistribution of wealth fan
*Anita Dunn, fan of Chairman Mao
*Mark Lloyd, FCC 'Diversity Czar'
*Carol Browner, socialist
*Robert Creamer, socialist

(You can watch Glenn debunk Obama's claim HERE)

~

Again, my personal opinion is that the election of Barack Obama is a terrible tragedy. It is a tragedy because people of color believed that a vote for Barack was a vote that permanently confirmed their complete integration into the United States of America in every way. I do not believe most of these voters were voting for a socialist, they thought they were voting for Hope and Change.

The election of Barack Obama is a tragedy because people who use the race card as a means of political gain are playing it now when the Administration is criticized. At a time when race should be of no consequence to any of us these Jesse Jackson and John Lewis and Al Sharpton types will beat the drum of racism to try to keep the voters of color on the side of the socialists.

But it is the Democrats who do not want to allow school vouchers, which would allow inner city kids a chance to go the the school that would best help them be educated. It is the Democrats who want to keep inner city poor populations poor and depending on welfare checks and food stamps and an underground economy of drugs and pawn shops when what they need, what we all need, are JOBS!

If this President wanted to help people, he would have tried to create jobs and give people a chance to work and make money and improve their lives. Instead he used every bit of political clout and backroom dealing to push out an arguably unconstitutional takeover of one-sixth of the American economy. Think about his priorities - giving bailouts and taking over parts of corporations, "stimulus" monies being given proportionally by party affiliation and for often ridiculous and useless projects, taking over health care and the student loan industry.

I don't oppose the black half of Barack Obama. I don't oppose the white half. I do not care. I oppose Barack Obama because Barack Obama is wrong. He is seeking to impose failed socialistic programs that will kill our economy and bring nothing but woes to future generations unless in 2010 we vote in a Congress that will stop the madness and defund the mistakes. It is as simple and yet as difficult as that. Big money wants Obama to win because big money knows how to profit from the despair of the rest of us. They can take over property when the owners cannot even pay their taxes. They can snap up businesses at rock bottom prices. Rich guys like George Soros and Al Gore are not afraid of another great depression, they know how to play it and they have money tucked away. It is you and I who will suffer.

Forget your prejudices. Cast aside party affiliations. Decide if you want America to be the beacon on a hill like Ronald Reagan saw it, or a system of wealth redistribution as Barack Obama sees it.