Disciples of Darwin Make Fake News

We have clearly seen many times that the news media for the secular science industry is primarily interested in two things: sales (including advertisements in "click bait" headlines), and convincing people that evolution is true. If evolution were true, they wouldn't need to resort to fake news and misrepresenting biblical creation science.

Mostly made at PhotoFunia

Money matters a whole heap to secularists, so I hope you clear the tracking cookies on your computer every once in a while.

There are numerous reports that claim to have evidence for evolution that came from researchers interpreting evidence with their Charles Darwin Club Secret Decoder Rings™. Other times, the secular news media are putting words in the mouths of scientists. It's mighty strange that people have a trust-distrust attitude toward scientists, and Americans have a general distrust of secular media in general — many even call it "the enemy of the people"! Then people will read headlines or stories from the Darwin propaganda mill and accept them. Wouldn't it be nice if people utilized healthy skepticism and critical thinking?

. . . the scientific media is not much more trustworthy than the rest. This is illustrated in the recent coverage of a small bird found on the tiny coral atoll in the Indian Ocean called Aldabra. According to the widespread media coverage, the white-throated rail (Dryolimnas cuvieri) on this island was wiped out by a flood over one-hundred-thousand years ago, then the same species somehow re-evolved. These articles were claiming this species had somehow resurrected itself. But this is not what the actual scientific paper had claimed. The paper had claimed it was the same genus, not the same species, and rightly so since they were working with only two bones. The popular portrayal of this particular study was so egregious it prompted a stern rebuke from noted atheist evolutionist Dr. Jerry Coyne, who maintains a personal blog alongside his scientific publications. He wrote that “the popular press grossly misreported what this finding means, claiming that the same species evolved twice independently. And that’s just not true.” It is not often we can agree with Dr. Coyne, but in this instance, he is quite correct.

To read the entire article, click on "Can We Trust Science Media?" Here are some other articles to help illustrate the points made:

• Fake Science in Natural Selection Claims
• Evolution Study Spins Defeat into Victory
• False Reporting in the Science Press
• Questioning the Evolution Propagandists
• More On Dinosaur Feather Fake News

Lyrics for "You Get What You Choose"