Surprising Modifications Denying Evolution

Charles Darwin modified the ancient religious views of universal common descent evolution, gussied it up with his hijacked version of Natural selection, and made it a part of Victorian mythology. It was resisted at first, then accepted. Then it became mainstream. Eventually, it began to fade.

Evolution was rescued by taking elements from the science of genetics (pioneered by Gregor Mendel, peas be upon him), which gave the world the neo-Darwinism synthesis. This has had problems in recent years due to improvements in science. Because of more developments, things are not going well.

Axolotl image: Wikimedia Commons / Stan Shebs (CC BY-SA 3.0)

As any of the schoolchildren who just walked by (coming home from another day of indoctrination) can tell you, evolution is based on time, chance, random processes, mutations, Darwin's fake god Natural Selection, and luck. (Well, the kids won't know that Darwin tried to displace the Creator with Natural Selection, nor that true natural selection is not a creative force.) This, too, is having problems. 

Biblical creationists know that organisms were designed to adapt by the Master Engineer. We are learning along with secular scientists that mutations are not so random after all, and are not too surprised that modifications can happen without mutations or natural selection. Observing the axolotl and a species of whitefly involve modifications in evolution-defying ways. Of course, Darwin's acolytes put a spin on everything, including defeat.

Neo-Darwinism may die the death of a thousand cuts. Biologists are finding new ways that organisms adapt and survive without RM+NS (random mutations and natural selection). Creationists and design advocates have long argued that the ‘mechanisms’ of mutation and selection (if the Stuff Happens Law can be graced with the term ‘mechanism’) cannot add new genetic information. Where does new information come from? In a growing number of cases, it was already built in or readily available from nearby libraries. If the information was already there, no RM or NS was required. Here are some recent examples.

Take a look at the rest over at "How to Adapt Without New Genes." You may also be interested in "Axolotl Salamanders and — Medical Science?"