The Ubiquitous Lie of Chance, Human Reptile Descent
We cannot be endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights if we do not have a Creator
"The fundamental pseudo-scientific a priori premise of the NAS is this: There is no Creator/Designer. Their deductive conclusion from this arbitrary religious premise is: Therefore, atheist materialist molecules-to-man evolution—what I prefer to call chance human reptile descent—must be true. That is the sum of their a priori pseudo-science. Inductive observation and experiment are utterly absent from their system. The NAS has become an organization of atheist ideologues, not scientists searching for the truth in nature." - Robert Bowie Johnson
This is an essay from the Canada Free Press...Yes, there are patriotic folks who believe in the same things our Founding Fathers did back when America was founded. Perhaps the foremost oasis in a desert of liberal loonbattism in Canada is the CFP...
In a book review of Brilliant Blunders in the June 9th Washington Post by Mario Levin headlined “Colossal mistakes by towering geniuses,” Outlook contributor Marcia Bartusiak writes:
Darwin, of course, demonstrated that species on Earth were not independently created; instead, the diversity of plants and animals arose over time with adaptations to their environments through natural selection.
The first problem with Bartusiak’s statement is that Darwin “demonstrated” nothing but his own ability to wildly speculate. Charles Darwin was a Scripture-denying materialist philosopher and circular logician, not a scientist. Sir Francis Darwin, as editor of his father’s Life and Letters, wrote of his father’s propensity for speculation that “it was as though he were charged with a theorizing power ready to flow into any channel on the slightest disturbance.” Darwin’s elder brother Erasmus wrote to Charles after reading his copy of The Origin of Species: “The a priori reasoning is so entirely satisfactory to me that if the facts won’t fit in, why so much the worse for the facts is my feeling.”
To read the rest, click here.
Stormbringer's Thunder has a GREAT post on Atheists and their behavior on blogs and Facebook here.
Trolls on Facebook are all individuals, so not every one of them behaves badly. But this Christopher Smith fellow who was posting on Facebook made some very simplistic blunders while questioning a post and I was happy to answer his questions. But he broke the rules of the site and the site administrator banned him. Before he was banned, his questions were all answered and frankly he really didn't understand evolution nearly as well as the commenters on this blog. My average troll at least understands the basics of evolution. They may not see the fundamental errors of the mythology, but they know the narrative. It was pretty funny that he declared victory after being shredded...
 |
| Used under federal Fair Use provisions for educational purposes |
Oh, he got replies. In fact he got lots of replies. He thought that 20% of all mutations are favorable and didn't know how speciation worked. He'd not even heard of Kirschner and Gerhart's work ( Kirschner, M.W. and Gerhart, J.C., The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2005). He thought that there were bacteria that had evolved when in fact the Citrase, Nylonase and Arsenate bacteria were all examples of either a broken mechanism (Citrase) or pre-existing genetic material that we'd not realized was there (Nylonase) or just plain false advertising (Arsenate). He claimed to go to several links and read them all within a few minutes when he certainly didn't have the time to do so. He was banned for breaking the forum rules (not my forum, not my call). Then he went to some Atheist site to brag on his victory.
If you want to see a really good post on the problems of Atheists, by all means go to that Stormbringer link and check it out. Did you know that Atheists are less trusted by the average person than Muslims? In fact, less trusted than any other group?
Atheism and Darwinism and Socialism are creating a generation of people who do not really understand critical thinking and have become accustomed to having people think for them. They are fed sets of so-called facts and expected to spit them back out on tests. Inquiring minds are not necessarily welcomed. It is no wonder Americans are beginning to turn to home-schooling. Public schools and education no longer have a friendly relationship.